Comments on COUNTER RACISM NOW!: Is being Jewish a racial or religious classificati...

Good question Mr. Fisher. I guess not when I think...

2009-11-29T15:13:11.487-08:00

Good question Mr. Fisher. I guess not when I think about it. It does appear that "white" people classify their babies as "white" without the baby being able to do so.

Thank you Mr. SynQ.

You say: "Hell, a 3 ...

2008-08-29T02:50:00.000-07:00
Thank you Mr. SynQ.

You say: "Hell, a 3 month old baby does not even know that they are classified as 'white'."

Does a person have to classify themselves as "white" in addition to be classified as "white" by other white persons and that self-classification as "white" having to be accepted by other "white" persons in order for that person to be "white"?

Thank you for commenting Mr.Fisher.

I base ...

2008-08-28T20:52:00.000-07:00
Thank you for commenting Mr.Fisher.

I base this statement of these three catagories on my own logic and observations of how the system works.

I have not met every person classified as "white", but I have met people who looked "white" to me but, were not "white" to other people who classified themselves as "white". Those very same people determined by "white" people not to be "white". I myself have been determined not to be "white", by "white" people. The first time that I found out that I was not "white" was when I was four or five years old. I know that at that point, he made me feel so bad about it that I wondered why God made me "black". As far as the Racists go, I have not met every "white" person AND the logic tells me that a baby or a senile person does not have the ability (intent) to mistreat me, so I cannot say that all "white" people are racists. Hell, a 3 month old baby does not even know that they are classified as "white".

SynQ...

"As a result of the SYSTEM of wh...

2008-08-28T01:04:00.000-07:00
SynQ...

"As a result of the SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism) there are three functional categories of people:

White people
Non-White people (black, brown, red, yellow, beige, tan, etc.)
White Supremacists (Racists)"

What do you base this statement of the three categories of people on?

Is this a true statement?

Show me how you arrived at that conclusion, please.

Thank you.

2008-08-28T01:03:00.000-07:00
This comment has been removed by the author.

To Anonymous:

I find it unfortunate that yo...

2008-07-31T12:34:00.000-07:00
To Anonymous:

I find it unfortunate that you claim that my article is incorrect, yet you do not site specific sections of my article. To simply say it is incorrect and not produce any evidence of HOW it is incorrect, and then mention your confusing babble is what is incorrect.

For example- "Jews became "White" -- but this is too simple. Jews of European descent have had the easiest time (but they can find themselves under the gun of white supremacy when their religion or Jewish ancestry is revealed to non-Jewish "whites" in power who were otherwise unaware of their "Jewishness"). Jews of African descent are not considered "white". Lenny Kravitz might be a good celebrity example. There are "black" Jews in Ethiopia as well."

Only supports what I have already stated when I said that when a "white" person says that they are "Jewish" it does not mean that they are a "non-white" person.

Like most "non-white" people assume that they are.

Your babble is confusing because first you say that "European Jews" BECAME "white" as though they were "non-white" and then made "white" and then you mention "Ethiopian Jews" as being "non-white" Jews (who could never be classified as "white") and then calling it simple.

Here's simple right here:

"White" people and "Non-white" people can be Jewish. "Jewish" does not mean "non-white" person.

I wrote the article to help Victims of RACE-ism understand that "Jewish" is a religious behavior and not a skin color or racial classification.

That is why I suggested that they run the experiment that I listed at the end of my article. If you read my article again you will find that in no part of it did I mention the word "race" or state that people are made up into "races", which is another assumption on your part without doing any investigating (asking questions) as to whether or not I believed in the concept of "race", which I do not.

This analysis is incorrect in some places, but cou...

2008-07-23T09:25:00.000-07:00
This analysis is incorrect in some places, but could be revised.

The concept of "Race" is itself a racist concept and only stretches back through 400 years. It is a dynamic concept (definitions, etc. change to suit the needs of white supremacy).

Jews became "White" -- but this is too simple. Jews of European descent have had the easiest time (but they can find themselves under the gun of white supremacy when their religion or Jewish ancestry is revealed to non-Jewish "whites" in power who were otherwise unaware of their "Jewishness"). Jews of African descent are not considered "white". Lenny Kravitz might be a good celebrity example. There are "black" Jews in Ethiopia as well.

The "white race" is simply an idea that has boundaries that have shifted over time to suit white supremacy. Irish were not considered "white" until the early 1900s. In fact, in the South, plantation owners would sometimes hire Irish to do certain dangerous jobs because a dead Irishman would not result in the loss of economic wealth that a bonded person of African descent would for a plantation owner.

If you look at a basketball team in the 1920s, they are almost all Jewish--and the athletic success of these athletes was explained as stemming from the "cunning, shyster", etc. attributes of this "racial" group. In modern times, the athletic success of African Americans is explained in biological/"racial" terms. But this is just white supremacy in action--a form of biological and cultural racism used to evade discussions of white supremacy.

Being "Jewish" is both a religious and a "racial" classification.

There are no ways of classifying DNA by "race". The best that can be done is to chart people into haplogroups of common geographical descent, but the genetic variance between haplogroups is smaller than the variance within haplogroups. Nonetheless, modern science shows that all human beings have the same great-great ad infinitum grandmother who lived in East Africa. Scientists call her "mitochondrial Eve".

Joseph Graves book, "The Emperor's New Clothes" or "The Race Myth" are useful books on the fallacy of "race" as a real thing. For history, see Audrey Smedley's (2007), "Race in North America" (THE authoritative text on the subject of "race").

For a good study of Racism in America, see Joe Feagin's (2000) book "Racist America."

Comments on COUNTER RACISM NOW!: Is being Jewish a racial or religious classificati...

Good question Mr. Fisher. I guess not when I think...

Thank you Mr. SynQ.You say: "Hell, a 3 ...

Thank you for commenting Mr.Fisher.I base ...

SynQ..."As a result of the SYSTEM of wh...

To Anonymous:I find it unfortunate that yo...

This analysis is incorrect in some places, but cou...

Thank you Mr. SynQ.

You say: "Hell, a 3 ...

Thank you for commenting Mr.Fisher.

I base ...

SynQ...

"As a result of the SYSTEM of wh...

To Anonymous:

I find it unfortunate that yo...