tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32252561.post9082289664995808660..comments2009-12-15T11:33:06.635-08:00Khalif "SynQ" Muhammadnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32252561.post-43883909814817674392009-12-15T11:33:06.635-08:002009-12-15T11:33:06.635-08:00Yes I know exactly what you mean. I am not saying that this pic is overtly Racist. I am saying that it is indirectly sending a message, and that message cooperates with Racism (White Supremacy), in the same way that the King Kong pic did years ago. It is nothing more than a refined version of the same message. &quot;Big Aggressive Black Beast wants sexy White woman&quot;"SynQ"http://www.blogger.com/profile/12503775643296567190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32252561.post-24303917253173341712008-04-20T21:33:00.000-07:002008-04-20T21:33:00.000-07:00I agree with you a little bit... <BR/><BR/>I just didn't understand why they would just choose such an ugly pose for the front of the magazine cover, I don't think it's racist at all.<BR/><BR/>And I HAVE read The Isis Papers, but I don't think that by any means that they did this to be racist.<BR/><BR/><BR/>(On a different note, it reminded me of the ways that they used to show King Kong with an innocent white lady in the old movies... you know what I mean?Adamsonhttp://www.aeonity.com/adamsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32252561.post-65427782134057003352008-03-28T10:44:00.000-07:002008-03-28T10:44:00.000-07:00The person who wrote this article is either an idiot or is over thinking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com