Counter Racism Now! Campaigns

Monday, April 14, 2008

Is being Jewish a racial or religious classification ?

I know that Micheal Richards is old news but, I need to bring up a point. Who thought Micheal Richards was a "Jew"? I did. Did you? Be honest. Click here and see what JewishJournal.com had to say about him. How many non-white people thought well of Micheal Richards before his "racial tirade"?



I did.

I liked him every since I first saw him on the sketch comedy tv show "Fridays", back in the early 80's. I never pictured him as having any Racist thoughts, speech, and / or actions. Because I thought he was a cool dude who made me laugh. 

What used to nag at me was that the first "Jews", that I spent the most time and energy with, had blond hair, blue eyes, and they told me that they were "white". 


Me at 12 years old with the first "Jews" I met.


They also were the first to let me know that I was "black" because of the "Curse of Ham" and they used racist speech and actions against me all of the time, from the age of five until they moved away from our habitat, when I was twelve or thirteen years old. I think that most Victims of Racism (non-white people) have been trained to believe that "Jews" are only non-white people.  

This is because we're told the following repeatedly:

1.Hitler was a Nazi.
2.Nazis believe "White" is superior to "Non-white".
3.Nazis killed "Jews" because they believe "Jews" are inferior.
4."Jews" must be "Non-white"

But when we see people who appear to be "White" who talk to us as if being a "Jew" is apart of a "Race" we assume they are "White".


Hollywood has even trained us to believe that "Jews" have a certain appearance (me too even though the first "Jews" that I met did not match this image see above) as though, they are a "Race" of people. It was not until the 90's that I started to "see" this particular "Jewish look" a lot more, in movies and on television. Micheal Richards has that so-called "Jewish look".

The Racists who dominate the third major area of people activity, called Entertainment, have conditioned our minds to believe in this particular image. They want you and I to associate this image with being "Jewish".


You know the look, don't you? the Adam Sandler, Ben Steller, Jerry Seinfeld, look?

No? let me show you:

.

I started hearing all of this talk about "Jews" being a "Race" of people. Have you ever investigated the idea of a "Race"? What is exactly a "Race" of people? The RACE-ists want you to believe that it is some kind of genetic thing. Research it.

 Anyway, these quotes are from http://jewishjournal.com/hollywood/television/14043/: 

"According to traditional Jewish law, a Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversion to Judaism." 

"Liberal streams of Judaism also recognize as Jewish a person born of a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother." from the Michael Richards article are what stood out the most to me, because I have on many occasions spoken to "Jews" who have told me that they were "white", and I have seen them functioning as "white" people. Meaning I have witnessed "white" people treat them better than they treated me. 

I had a high school classmate who told me he is a "white" person until some "white" people find out he is a "Jew" and then, all of a sudden he is treated as a "non-white" person.

He also told me that he functions as a "white" person around "non-white" people. This was confusing to me.

Can both the "traditional Jewish Law" and the "Liberal streams of Judaism" quotes apply to a "white" person as well as a non-white person?

"traditional Jewish Law"

Lets see.......if the mother is a "white" person and she went "through the formal process of conversion to Judaism", she'd be a Jew. If she had offspring with a non-Jew "white" person, their offspring would be both "white" and "Jewish". Correct?

If the mother is a "non-white" person and she went "through the formal process of conversion to Judaism", she'd be a Jew.

If she had offspring with a non-Jew "non-white" person, their offspring would be both "non-white" and "Jewish". Correct?

 
"Liberal streams of Judaism"

If a "non-white" father, "has gone through the formal process of conversion to Judaism", then he is a "Non-white Jew" and his offspring is thus "non-white" and "Jewish". Correct?

 If a "white" father, "has gone through the formal process of conversion to Judaism", then he is a "White Jew" and his offspring is thus "white" and "Jewish". Correct?

Ok, can anyone go through a formal process of conversion to being classified as "non-white"? well as a non-white person I can tell you. No.

Can anyone go through a "formal process of conversion to being classified as "black"? No.

So, why are there "white" people trying to get you and I to believe that being "Jewish" is a Racial Classification?

I suspect that they do it to cause maximum confusion in the minds of Victims of Racism (non-white people) as to what Racism is and what Racism is not.

Such people are either Racists impersonating a "Jew", or they are a "white" person or a non-white person passing on this confusion, indirectly, in my opinion.

To be a part of a religion simply means that you choose to behave in a certain way that distinguishes you from others, who are not behaving in that same way. In other words you say and do the things a "Jew" does and does not do, in order to be a "Jew". It is a choice.

Racists (white supremacists) do a lot of impersonating in every religion on this planet. They impersonate other religious behaviors (Muslim, Christian ,Jew, Hindu, etc.) in order to spread their own religious behavior of Racism / White Supremacy.

Because of them Racism / White Supremacy has become the worlds most powerful religion, and I suspect that many Racists (White Supremacists) have infiltrated and used the Jewish Religion to make this a reality. The next time you meet a person that you suspect is a "white" person who tells you that they are "Jewish", run this experiment, created by Edward Williams of counter-racism.org.

Observed Phenomenon: People who say they are "Jews" or "Jewish" when asked what race they are.

Hypothesis: This experiment examines the response of a person that says they are a "Jew" or "Jewish" when asked what race they are. This experiment identifies and promotes the practical value of asking a person if they are a white person.

I have observed the following: A person who says they are a "Jew" or "Jewish" are thought by many "non-white" people to be "white" people. A person who says they are a "Jew" or "Jewish" are thought by many "white" people to be "non-white" people.

Upon asking the critical question to two "Jewish" men on different occasions and 13 years apart. They both gave me the exact same answers. I don't know if they know each other or not.

Critical Question:
Are you a "White" person?

They said: "I am a "White" person around "White" people and a "Non-white" person around "Non-white" people. These two individuals are on my racist suspect list, because deception is a major tool for practicing racism. I didn't get to ask them what they are in the presence of a "White" person and a "Non-white" person.

Herein lies the confusion. As a result of the SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism) there are three functional categories of people: "White" people "Non-White" people (black, brown, red, yellow, beige, tan, etc.) White Supremacists (Racists)


Whenever a non-white person deviates from these three functional categories they lose focus. Because there is so much confusion around the terms "Jew" and/or "Jewish" it is best not to deviate from the three basic functional categories of people listed above.

 The current supreme SYSTEM functioning on this planet is about color and it functions in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex, and War. 

An effect of this experiment legitimizes the necessity for racists (WS) to divide non-white people into categories to further confuse them about what Racism is and how it works. Terms such as black, pacific islander, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Jew, Ethnicity etc. Should become meaningless to the attempted counter racist in a SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism).

Experiment: Questions to ask are as follows:
 
What is your race? (This question should not be asked because it allows the person responding too much wiggle room. Scratch this question from your list.) 

What is your ethnic background? (This question should not be asked because it allows the person responding too much wiggle room. Scratch this question from your list.) 

Are you from the Middle East? (This question should not be asked because it allows the person responding too much wiggle room. Scratch this question from your list.) 

Are you an American? (This question should not be asked because it allows the person responding too much wiggle room. Scratch this question from your list.) 

Are you a white person? Are you a white "jew" or a non-white "jew"?

Are you a white "jewish" person or a non-white "jewish" person?

Results: Once non-white people stray away from the categories the white people who practice white supremacy (racism) use to run all of the business on this planet it leads to confusion.

There are white and non-white "Jews", white and non-white "Catholics", white and non-white "Christians".

These are all ideas. White Supremacy (Racism) is an idea that has been made a reality. The White Supremacists (Racists) decide which "religion" is and is not a valid "religion".

Scientific Theory: A "Jew" is a person that is either white or non-white and the White Supremacists (Racists) decide color classification.

18 comments:

  1. This analysis is incorrect in some places, but could be revised.

    The concept of "Race" is itself a racist concept and only stretches back through 400 years. It is a dynamic concept (definitions, etc. change to suit the needs of white supremacy).

    Jews became "White" -- but this is too simple. Jews of European descent have had the easiest time (but they can find themselves under the gun of white supremacy when their religion or Jewish ancestry is revealed to non-Jewish "whites" in power who were otherwise unaware of their "Jewishness"). Jews of African descent are not considered "white". Lenny Kravitz might be a good celebrity example. There are "black" Jews in Ethiopia as well.

    The "white race" is simply an idea that has boundaries that have shifted over time to suit white supremacy. Irish were not considered "white" until the early 1900s. In fact, in the South, plantation owners would sometimes hire Irish to do certain dangerous jobs because a dead Irishman would not result in the loss of economic wealth that a bonded person of African descent would for a plantation owner.

    If you look at a basketball team in the 1920s, they are almost all Jewish--and the athletic success of these athletes was explained as stemming from the "cunning, shyster", etc. attributes of this "racial" group. In modern times, the athletic success of African Americans is explained in biological/"racial" terms. But this is just white supremacy in action--a form of biological and cultural racism used to evade discussions of white supremacy.

    Being "Jewish" is both a religious and a "racial" classification.

    There are no ways of classifying DNA by "race". The best that can be done is to chart people into haplogroups of common geographical descent, but the genetic variance between haplogroups is smaller than the variance within haplogroups. Nonetheless, modern science shows that all human beings have the same great-great ad infinitum grandmother who lived in East Africa. Scientists call her "mitochondrial Eve".

    Joseph Graves book, "The Emperor's New Clothes" or "The Race Myth" are useful books on the fallacy of "race" as a real thing. For history, see Audrey Smedley's (2007), "Race in North America" (THE authoritative text on the subject of "race").

    For a good study of Racism in America, see Joe Feagin's (2000) book "Racist America."

    ReplyDelete
  2. To Anonymous:

    I find it unfortunate that you claim that my article is incorrect, yet you do not site specific sections of my article. To simply say it is incorrect and not produce any evidence of HOW it is incorrect, and then mention your confusing babble is what is incorrect.

    For example- "Jews became "White" -- but this is too simple. Jews of European descent have had the easiest time (but they can find themselves under the gun of white supremacy when their religion or Jewish ancestry is revealed to non-Jewish "whites" in power who were otherwise unaware of their "Jewishness"). Jews of African descent are not considered "white". Lenny Kravitz might be a good celebrity example. There are "black" Jews in Ethiopia as well."

    Only supports what I have already stated when I said that when a "white" person says that they are "Jewish" it does not mean that they are a "non-white" person.

    Like most "non-white" people assume that they are.

    Your babble is confusing because first you say that "European Jews" BECAME "white" as though they were "non-white" and then made "white" and then you mention "Ethiopian Jews" as being "non-white" Jews (who could never be classified as "white") and then calling it simple.

    Here's simple right here:

    "White" people and "Non-white" people can be Jewish. "Jewish" does not mean "non-white" person.

    I wrote the article to help Victims of RACE-ism understand that "Jewish" is a religious behavior and not a skin color or racial classification.

    That is why I suggested that they run the experiment that I listed at the end of my article. If you read my article again you will find that in no part of it did I mention the word "race" or state that people are made up into "races", which is another assumption on your part without doing any investigating (asking questions) as to whether or not I believed in the concept of "race", which I do not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. SynQ...

    "As a result of the SYSTEM of white supremacy (racism) there are three functional categories of people:

    White people
    Non-White people (black, brown, red, yellow, beige, tan, etc.)
    White Supremacists (Racists)"


    What do you base this statement of the three categories of people on?

    Is this a true statement?

    Show me how you arrived at that conclusion, please.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for commenting Mr.Fisher.

    I base this statement of these three catagories on my own logic and observations of how the system works.

    I have not met every person classified as "white", but I have met people who looked "white" to me but, were not "white" to other people who classified themselves as "white". Those very same people determined by "white" people not to be "white". I myself have been determined not to be "white", by "white" people. The first time that I found out that I was not "white" was when I was four or five years old. I know that at that point, he made me feel so bad about it that I wondered why God made me "black". As far as the Racists go, I have not met every "white" person AND the logic tells me that a baby or a senile person does not have the ability (intent) to mistreat me, so I cannot say that all "white" people are racists. Hell, a 3 month old baby does not even know that they are classified as "white".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you Mr. SynQ.

    You say: "Hell, a 3 month old baby does not even know that they are classified as 'white'."

    Does a person have to classify themselves as "white" in addition to be classified as "white" by other white persons and that self-classification as "white" having to be accepted by other "white" persons in order for that person to be "white"?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good question Mr. Fisher. I guess not when I think about it. It does appear that "white" people classify their babies as "white" without the baby being able to do so.

    ReplyDelete

Thank You For Your Comments