My Experiences with "White" females part one

          Webster’s New World Dictionary (1968 Edition) defines Propaganda as any organization or movement working for the propagation of particular ideas, doctrines, practices etc. It further defines it as any systematic, widespread, deliberate indoctrination or plan for such indoctrination.

TO A WHITE GIRL

I love you

Because you're white,

Not because you're charming

Or bright,

Your whiteness

Is a silky thread

Snaking through my thoughts,

In redhot patterns

Of lust and desire.

I hate you

Because you're white.

Your white meat

Is nightmare food.

White is

The skin of Evil.

You're my Moby Dick,

White Witch,

Symbol of the rope and hanging tree,

Of the burning cross.

 Loving you thus

And hating you so,

My heart is torn in two.

Crucified.

                                                                    - Eldridge Cleaver


On Sun 6/20/10, I was a guest on the C.O.W.S. Radio show. I was asked to talk about, what was referred to as a "Tragic Arrangement". I was told that a Tragic Arrangement is when a "non-white" person and a "white" person associate with each other for the purpose of having sexual intercourse. Under a system of Racism (White Supremacy), this kind of relationship is a Tragic Arrangement. Let me explain. My memory takes me back to when I was 5 years old, and even to 3 years (in some instances). I saw a lot of  programming (television and films). Every program that I saw presented images of "white" people showing affection for each other. I saw images of "white" females behaving in a manner that made them appear as though they were perfect.

The first "white" person on t.v. that I was attracted to, was Shirley Temple. I didn't think that I was "black". I knew that my skin was brown, but, it had not clicked to me that the color of my skin made a significant difference between us (in fact it only makes a difference because of Racism / White Supremacy). Thinking that she was the same age or close to my age, I imagined that she would be my girlfriend someday. Then one day my mother told me that Shirley Temple was already an adult by the time that she (my mom) was 8 years old and had started watching her in the movies. I was devastated. It was also at this time that both of my folks told me about the roles that Black people were limited to playing in her movies because of Racism (White Supremacy). I still wanted to be with her regardless...

New edition added on 5/1/11 :

Anyway, I remember seeing her with Mr. Bojangles and thinking "wow, she likes Black people" and at the same time disliking him for being an "Uncle Tom" and / or "Sell-out":
There was this feeling as though the "White" woman would provide me with nourishment or something ( I could hear the cow bells ringing as though I were on Gus' show, right now).

Throw in Jody Foster, Tatum O'Neal, Linda Blair, and Kristy McNichol, as the other little ones that I that were my age. Then adult "white" women like Brooke Shields, Kate Jackson, Jaclyn Smith, Cheryl Ladd, Lindsey Wagner, Angie Dickenson, Raquel Welch, the list goes on. They were on shows with titles like "Charlie's Angels", "Police Woman", "Wonder Woman", "Bionic Woman", etc. "White" was right. There were very few "non-white" females on t.v. back then. Any that were on t.v. were perceived as "unattractive". Although, there was Denise Nichols.

At this stage in my existence, there were three "white" girls within my habitat,one stayed next door, another stayed across the street, and then there was Heidi at my daycare. Heidi was the most interesting (at that time) of the three because we ( I think that she showed me how) "played house" and "doctor" a lot. I wanted to do the same with the other two, but they had dolls to act out with. BARBIE DOLLS! The first dolls I ever saw Barbie and Ken. I always used the Ken doll. Barbie had a house, car, clothes, and lots and lots of shoes. Ken had a lot of things too. Anyway, I liked playing with the Ken doll. My attempted parents noticed that I liked dolls, and started buying G.I. Joe, Star Trek, Planet of the Apes, Superman, Batman, Capt. Kirk, the Six-Million Dollar Man, and some other dolls that I had. Many times I'd forget the dolls and just pretend to be them. All of them considered to be "white" men. And most of the time the "white" kids didn't hesitate to let me know that I was only pretending to be them. Sometimes they'd tell me that I can't be any of these characters because I was "black". All of the leading "white" men in what ever program that I watched, I wanted to be like. Those men where usually tasked to save the "white / innocent / pure / angelic / princess / damsel in distress". I suspect that many "non-white" females wanted to be like the "white" women in such programs as well. Anyway, I always found a need to please the "white" girls that I was around, with the hopes that they would choose me to be their mate. Man, it's amazing how much of my memory is coming back as I write this post. I was attracted to a lot of "white" females in film, television, and in person. I still find myself attracted to lighter skinned (presumably classified as "white") females. I can remember feeling a deep need to "save" them, not realizing that in comparison to myself, I was the one who needed the most help. I am sure that everyone will agree that "white" women have no problem getting any help from anyone, when they need it.

For me, I thought (subconsciously) that as long as any attractive "white" women or any attractive "non-white" females (with skin lighter than my own) thought that I was attractive, it was enough to make me feel like I was an attractive "non-white" male. It meant that I was accepted. It's still a feeling that I wrestle with today. I still have this tremendous urge to not let my skin color determine how I function in this system. The truth is that my skin is no more important than any other part of my body. The deception is that under the system of Racism (White Supremacy) it is the number one cause for all of my problems. My skin always gets in the way, but, now most people want to pretend as though they are not thinking about it, while they are still thinking about it. For me as an individual it's also my eyes (that's another story).

4/13/12- Okay, I am back here adding to this post, because I can see that my experiences with "white" females part one, appears to get a lot of views, and thus must be constructive in some kind of way. Since this is part one, I've decided that this post will be where I come to update you on my earliest memories of any sexual experiences that I've had with "White" females. Today, what comes to mind is the "white" women that I witnessed my father-less (see Parent on page 281 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide) having "sexual play" with. I suspect I was between the ages of three and six. He brought me along with him. I think because he assumed that I was too young to know what was going on, but, I did know. I think that I learned about it from the TV. Seeing "White" people show affection for each other on TV (they didn't show affectionate "Black" people on TV in those days. In fact they didn't show "Black" people much at all.) at an early age, helped me to pick up on what I saw in his interaction with "White" women. Though he served as a Belly warmer (see page 239 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Textbook / Workbook) for "White" women, my father-less was in an attempted marriage (see Marriage on page 218 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide) with my mother-less (see Parent on page 281 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide).

Like most so-called marriages between "non-white" people it was full of conflict. Some of which I am sure had to do with "cheating". Anyway, the era that we are speaking of was in the early 70's. "White" liberals were promoting the idea of openly having sex with anyone, anything, at anytime, and anywhere, for no other reason than pleasure . They called it the "sexual revolution".

 Most of this kind of thinking started in the city of Berkeley, which is where I was going to school at the time. This is the era when terms and names like "Hippie", "Black Militant", "Lesbian", "Gay", "Vietnam Vet", "Huey Newton", "Patty Hearst", "Jim Jones", " The Zebra Killers", "The Zodiac", "Ronald Reagen", "Charles Manson", "George Jackson", "Richard Nixon", "Angela Davis" "J. Edger Hoover", were all in prominent use. Berkeley was one big "White" Liberal experiment. It was in the 70's that the "status quo" in this city attempted to make "Black" people comfortable with the affects of White Supremacy, by making both Malcolm X's and M.L.K.'s birthdays local holidays. This was 20 years before M.L.K.'s birthday was a national one. Okay, I think that you get the picture. It was while I attended these schools that my father-less, met most of these "White" women. He was a "Vietnam Vet" who wasn't laboring in exchange for money on a regular basis. See the so-called U.S.A. lost the "Vietnam War". Most "White" people in positions of power were upset about the whole thing, and thus weren't offing work to "Vietnam Vets", let alone a "Black" one. My father-less used his time and energy towards increasing the educational standards of "Non-white" children within the Berkeley school system. You see "White" women were made to appear to be thrown into the bunch of other so-called "Minorities".

CONTINUED HERE

Enforcement Officials Abuse Asset Forfeiture

On November 18, 2009, Shukree Simmons, a "black" male, and his business partner were driving from Macon, Georgia, back to Atlanta after selling his truck for $3,700. While traveling though Lamar County, Mr. Simmons was pulled over by two Enforcement Officials who did not give a reason for the stop. Mr. Simmons and his business partner, went through the usual questioning that so many "non-white" people go through when encountering Enforcement Officials. The Enforcement Officials searched both of them and the car. The search even included using a sniffing dog, but no evidence for the type of behavior that could lead to Greater Confinement was found.

Not accepting Mr. Simmons’ explanation that he acquired his money from the sale of his truck, the Enforcement Officials decided to confiscate the $3,700 on the suspicion that the cash was acquired from criminal actions committed by Mr. Simmons. They have this authority under the "Georgia" Civil Asset Forfeiture Code. They then allowed their victims to leave.

As soon as he was able to do so, Mr. Simmons mailed to the Enforcement Officials, the evidence (bill of sale and title for the truck)that proves how he got the money.  Mr. Simmons was informed that he had to file a "legal claim" to get his money back.

Now, consider this position that the system of Racism (White Supremacy) puts its victims in. Here is a situation where a "non-white" person has to PROVE that their money is rightfully theirs and that it was acquired through legitimate business practices, after it had been taken from that "non-white" person WITHOUT PROOF that it was not their money or that it had been earned illegitimately. I suspect that for most "non-white" people, it would have stopped there. Seeing that so many of us have a general lack in our behavior for meeting deadlines, researching, filling out paperwork, etc. Can you imagine how many "non-white" people placed in this same position, would give up on this?  Considering, all of the general things that one needs to say and do when dealing with this law?

Check it:

[b][i]"(n) If the estimated value of personal property seized is $25,000.00 or less, the district attorney may elect to proceed under the provisions of this subsection in the following manner:

(1) Notice of the seizure of such property shall be posted in a prominent location in the courthouse of the county in which the property was seized. Such notice shall include a description of the property, the date and place of seizure, the conduct giving rise to forfeiture, a statement that the owner of such property has 30 days within which a claim must be filed, and the violation of law alleged;

(2) A copy of the notice, which shall include a statement that the owner of such property has 30 days within which a claim must be filed, shall be served upon an owner, interest holder, or person in possession of the property at the time of seizure as provided in subsection (i) of this Code section and shall be published for at least three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the seizure was made;

(3) The owner or interest holder may file a claim within 30 days after the second publication of the notice of forfeiture by sending the claim to the seizing law enforcement agency and to the district attorney by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested;

(4) The claim must be signed by the owner or interest holder under penalty of perjury and must set forth:

(A) The caption of the proceedings as set forth on the notice of pending forfeiture and the name of the claimant;

(B) The address at which the claimant will accept mail;

(C) The nature and extent of the claimant́s interest in the property;

(D) The date, identity of the transferor, and circumstances of the claimant́s acquisition of the interest in the property;

(E) The specific provision of this Code section relied on in asserting that the property is not subject to forfeiture;

(F) All essential facts supporting each assertion; and

(G) The precise relief sought;

(5) If a claim is filed, the district attorney shall file a complaint for forfeiture as provided in subsection (o) or (p) of this Code section within 30 days of the actual receipt of the claim. A person who files a claim shall be joined as a party; and

(6) If no claim is filed within 30 days after the second publication of the notice of forfeiture, all right, title, and interest in the property is forfeited to the state and the district attorney shall dispose of the property as provided in subsection (u) of this Code section."
[/i][/b]

I listed the specific part of this law, that says what a person has to do in order to get their money back. You can view the whole law at the link listed above. It was easy for me to find it on the computer. How many "non-white" people don't have a computer? How many don't know what to do with a computer in order to find it? How many can't afford internet access? How many would know where to find this law without a computer? How many would think to check a law library? or the regular library for that matter. Most would probably think that they would have to get a lawyer, and then the next thought would probably be that they can't afford a lawyer. In Georgia, a basic retainer fee (the down payment to get the lawyer started on your case) is $5,000.

Do most VsOR have access to this kind of money? In the case of Mr.Simmons', he'd have to spend more money to get the attorney, then the amount of money that he is attempting to get back.

Regardless of this fact, Mr. Simmons, spoke to a lawyer anyway. That lawyer gave him some constructive information telling him that he should contact the ACLU.

According to the ACLU, which took Simmons' case in December 2009, they "sent a letter to Lamar County Sheriff Larry Waller asserting Mr. Simmons’s right to the money and seeking its return. Waller responded that he agreed that the state had no right to the funds, but directed Mr. Simmons to initiate a claim. The ACLU pushed back, and in early January the Sheriff returned the money to Mr. Simmons."

These "Asset forfeiture laws" have created an opportunity for Enforcement Officials to acquire huge profits, I suspect most of which came from Victims of Racism. The total amount acquired by use of these "Asset forfeiture laws" in 2003, was $38,330,861.00 in "Georgia" alone. Imagine whats going on in the other "states". The ACLU says in  its article that "Georgia’s law permits one-third of seizure proceeds to return to local law enforcement, which can be used for any law enforcement purpose except for the payment of salaries or rewards. The rest of the money goes into the local general fund, and must be used for programs such as drug treatment and witness protection. However, in Georgia and most other states, if police want access to more of the money for their budgets, they may turn over a drug-related seizure to the D.E.A., thereby federalizing the seizure. The DEA 'does the paperwork', handles any claims to the money by individuals (who must sue in federal court), and returns 80 percent of the money to the police, with no state law strings attached. Police may then use the funds for any law enforcement purpose, including payment of salaries. This process, known as equitable sharing, permits local law enforcement to do an end run around state civil asset forfeiture laws."

The ACLU also said in their article that "Reports from other asset forfeiture cases in the media and in lawsuits indicate that police do not seize assets from all equally. Instead, they target those persons they associate with criminal behavior and drug trafficking. The result is a regime of racial profiling of black and Latino drivers on the highways, who are stopped and stripped of their money based on minimal or non-existent evidence.

Mr. Simmons' case demonstrates the extent to which civil asset forfeiture laws, formed to assist officers in fighting drug crimes, are misused against people of color in cases in which there is no evidence of criminal activity. Mr. Simmons was never arrested and never charged. Instead, the Sheriff's department took his money, admitted that it has no right to keep the money, and told Mr. Simmons that he must make a legal claim to get it back. The ACLU seeks to challenge this and other civil asset forfeiture law abuses. The era of easy money for police departments by wrongfully taking cash from vulnerable drivers must end."

In my opinion one reason that has probably made it easy for Enforcement Officials to seize people's money when there was no correct reason to seize it, was because the individuals involved my have consented to having their vehicles searched. They probably were thinking, "I don't have anything to hide", and let the Enforcement Officials conduct a search. I used to do it all of the time, until it downed on me that these searches take a lot of time, are embarrassing, and can be humiliating as well. Sometimes they unscrew the seats! Many of my days have been ruined because of these kind of stops. Sticking with the constitution , you can say no to the Enforcement Officials searching your vehicle. As long as you do not have any felonies. In most states if you have a felony, many of the constitutional laws don't apply to you. I suspect that this one of the reasons why many "non-white" people, are persuaded (through Racist Propaganda) to practice the type of behavior that leads them to acquire felonies. Anyway, if your money is in your glove box, or in a brief case, or even an envelope inside your car, and you say no to a search, you should be in the clear of keeping your money. I ain't no lawyer, just a Victim of Racism, making a suggestion.

Current Situation in Haiti

"...Hayti (is) the glory of the blacks and terror of tyrants...I hope that she may be united, keeping a strict look-out for tyrants, for if they get the least chance to injure her, they will avail themselves of it...But one thing which gives me joy is, that they (the Haitians) are men (and women) who would be cut off to a man before they would yield to the combined forces of the whole world-----in fact, if the whole world was combined against them it could not do anything with them..." ---David Walker

from: David Walker’s Appeal, 1829

There is some kind of  Racist interest in "Haiti". Some years ago the Racists (White Supremacists) removed Jean-Claude Aristide who was literally selected by the Racist Liberals to be "President of Haiti" in 1991. Back then for some reason the Racist Conservatives were against it.

Anyway, the "Haitian" military did not go for it and in-acted a coup in September 1991, taking Aristide out as "President of Haiti". However, the Racist Liberals used the threat of violence against the "Haitian" military, and Aristide became "President of Haiti" again from 1994 to 1996 and then from 2001 to 2004. In February 2004, the Racist Conservatives, used the threat of violence to remove him, by literally kidnapping him from his residence and dropping him off in "Africa".

It appeared to me that like Saddam Hussein, Manual Noriega, Idi Amin, Robert Mugabe, Muammar Quadafi, and many other Victims (of what I call Racist {White Supremacist} Ventriloquism), who have been removed, killed, or sanctioned, Aristide no longer wanted to be a their puppet. He attempted to cut the strings and forgot who made him president.

Usually, when this type of activity is observed, it means that the area is either of strategic importance or their is a particular resource that the Racists must maintain control over. "Haiti" has a few reasons:

The first is that it was the first so-called "Black Republic" or "Nation" on this planet. According to His-Story, it achieved victory over its oppressors while the rest of the "non-white" people were enslaved on the rest of the planet. It's rebellion inspired other slaves to rebel and caused the ruling class "white" people (leaders of "Britain", "France", "Spain", etc.) to stop fighting each other and unify their efforts against "Haiti". I suspect that from that day on "Haiti" had to appear to the rest of the world as an example of "how niggers can mess up a country".

The second is that geographically and militarily, it is very close to the habitat of the most powerful Racists (White Supremacists) in what they call the "North Western Hemisphere". Which means that it holds value as a place that cannot have effective numbers of people working against them.

The third which just came to me as I sit here looking at George Bush's involvement in this, must be resources. If he gets involved, its got to be connected to Oil. Yep. Sure enough.

Rene Preval and "W"

"Haiti" has a huge Oil Reserve that has remained untapped for a decades.

Racist Economic interests in "Haiti"

www.margueritelaurent.com (very informative source on "Haiti")

The CIA World Fact book ranks "Haiti" as 163 on the list of areas that has a "stock of proved reserves of crude oil in barrels (bbl). Proved reserves are those quantities of petroleum which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions."

The current "President of Haiti", Rene Preval, is a member of the "National Institute for Mineral Resources". He is who the Racists (White Supremacists) have replaced Aristide with.

I predict that "Haiti" is about to under go



Racial Show Casing -Preval and his "wife" Elizabeth) will be very popular after this event is over. Thousands of "non-white" people will almost over night appear to be successful all over "Haiti" in the months that will follow.

Racial Population Tailoring- This is what is happening in "Haiti" right now. Will it be millions of people found dead? or hundreds of thousands found dead?  I don't know. But, it will be enough to allow the Racists to have instant control of the areas where "non-white" people had spent a lot of time and energy.

I suspect that the Racists (White Supremacists) have caused this earthquake.

"Earthquakes induced by human activity have been documented in a few locations in the United States, Japan, and Canada. The cause was injection of fluids into deep wells for waste disposal and secondary recovery of oil, and the use of reservoirs for water supplies. Most of these earthquakes were minor. The largest and most widely known resulted from fluid injection at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver, Colorado. In 1967, an earthquake of magnitude 5.5 followed a series of smaller earthquakes. Injection had been discontinued at the site in the previous year once the link between the fluid injection and the earlier series of earthquakes was established. (Nicholson, Craig and Wesson, R.L., 1990, Earthquake Hazard Associated with Deep Well Injection--A Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1951, 74 p.)"-  USGS

"Scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) say that oil production can cause earthquakes," - source wiki.answers.com

"Here's how it works: With high-tech equipment, oil companies pinpoint oil-rich areas and use large drills to puncture the surface below the sea, sometimes as deep as 10,000 feet. As this pricey fluid gets sucked from the sediment pores, the surrounding rocks shift positions to fill in the newly vacated spaces. At a large scale, for example the volume displaced when millions of barrels of oil are produced, the land movement can actually cause a mini-seismic earthquake, according to Robert Morton, a USGS coastal geologist." - source wiki.answers.com  

Five ways to cause man made earthquakes

Racial Dislocation Many of the "Haitian" people have already been dislocated, and will be relocated to the "Dominican Republic". There they will be placed in tents and trailers and most of them will remain there.

"Haiti" is about to under go a huge face lift right now. Hundreds of Millions of dollars are about to be invested into rebuilding its infrastructure. Big corporate contracts in whatever industries that benefited from the War in Iraq and in Katrina. Possibly the same companies that were involved in the rebuilding of those areas.

I could see a Racist Suspect responding to this, by saying that "its a new day", and that "SynQ is paranoid". Well whatever, time and time again, when the Racists get involved in "helping" huge numbers of "non-white" people history has revealed that it usually involved some kind of deception on the part of the Racists.

So kiss SynQ's butt today

The Harry Reid Controversy

Let's face it, Harry Reid made the correct observation, about Obama. The truth is that everyone knows that Obama's lighter skin and use of words did help in his Presidential SELECTION. Under a system of Racism (White Supremacy), lighter skin is made to appear as though it is better than darker skin.  Though, all "non-white" people are mistreated, only the lighter skin "non-white" people, are allowed to access certain areas of the system.

The Racist Propaganda is too thick. Listen to the playback: "White is right, Yellow is mellow, Brown stick around, Red is dead, Black stay back."

Would "White" people have accepted the idea of a "non-white" person with the same skin color as Flava Flav as being the president?

Darker skinned "non-white" people are seen as "stupid", "lazy","ugly","emotional","savage","criminal", etc.  And this image is promoted at all times, in all places, and in all areas of people activity. Albeit Micheal Jackson knew the answer to that. Call him crazy, but he was doing exactly what the system trained him to do. Anyone who thinks that Micheal Jackson was popular all over the planet just because of his music, is not looking at the situation from all angles. For real.  "Non-white" people all over this planet spend billions in currency on skin lightening creams. Why?

Here is an interesting article on skin whitening.

Checkout Sammy Sousa. Hell, a lot  of "non-white" people would not like Obama, if he was darker skinned. Most of us don't even like our own skin. It may appear that I am defending Reid. I am not. I merely want to point out that his words reveal a truth, that could lead to an open dialog on the so-called "Race" problem. The Racists (White Supremacists) don't want that to happen, so making it appear that Reid's words are mistreating Obama, or any other Victim of Racism, on the basis of color is a Racist Propaganda Tactic  (I can see it, but have not yet found the precise words to describe it) designed to confuse huge numbers of "non-white" people, rendering and keeping them non-effective in countering Racism (White Supremacy). Why don't the Racists want a dialog on the "race" problem? Because  recognizing that a  "race" problem exists, would mean that a solution, would have to be found. Recognizing that  a solution would have to be found, would mean that a lot of questions have to be answered. Answering those questions in order to solve the "Race" problem, would lead to establishing Justice. Reid's words about Obama revealed a glitch in the matrix, and all of this hoopla, about it, is designed to get most "non-white" people to not see it as such.

Question: Who benefits most from the use of skin lightening AKA "skin whitening" cream, under a system of Racism (White Supremacy)?  A Victim of Racism ( "non-white" person)? or a Racist (White Supremacist)?

CONSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION: RACIST and COUNTER RACIST PROPAGANDA Part Three

CONSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION: RACIST PROPAGANDA is based on excerpts from the out of print book, entitled "The Fine Art of Propaganda; A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches" by The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.

ATTENTION: This article is a supplement to THE UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE / SYSTEM / CONCEPT a textbook / workbook for thought, speech, and / or action for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy) written by Neely Fuller Jr. I recommend that you read it, in order to get a better understanding of this concept. From here on out I will refer to it as the U.I.C.C.S.C.
“The seeds of the destruction of Racism (White Supremacy) are implanted in the very existence of Racism itself.” – Neely Fuller Jr.

(continued from last post)

If we are in a system of Racism (White Supremacy) and we are dominated and subjugated, by Racism (White Supremacy) at all times, in all places, and in all areas of people activity, then all Propaganda must be Racist Propaganda, because no propaganda has eliminated the system of Racism (White Supremacy) and thus indirectly supports it. REPEAT: no matter what kind of propaganda it appears to be if it does not reveal truth, promote justice, and make sure that the person who needs help gets the most constructive help they need, it should be considered Racist Propaganda.

If it has any affect on motivating effective numbers of people to make an attempt at resisting Racism (White Supremacy), and / or if it reveals truth, promotes justice, and makes sure that the person who needs help gets the most constructive help that they need it should be recognized as Counter-Racist Propaganda.

The Racist Propagandist attempts to influence the minds of people into co-operating with Racism (White Supremacy). They do not want their victims to carefully scrutinize and be critical of the words and images that they use. Their ultimate objective is to move you to continue to behave (think, speak, and / or act) in a specific way that is not constructive in replacing Racism (White Supremacy) with Justice. It will be a challenge, but, I suspect that Racist Propaganda can be spotted if one follows the logic.

Right now we are bombarded with so much propaganda, coming at us from every direction, that we will not start to see more of it, until we start questioning everything. The television is the main source of it all. I heard Dr. Welsing say that every Victim of Racism should take a strip of paper with the words “THE SYSTEM OF RACISM (WHITE SUPREMACY)” on it and put it right over the screen so that we could constantly be reminded of what we are looking at. I totally agree with her. So start by questioning everything that you see on the television. In addition to that you should put that same kind of strip on your radio as well.

Let’s look at the methods of propaganda. Some of the terms that were developed to describe these methods were confusing to me, so I have changed them to make them reveal the truth of what they describe. Where the term is confusing to me, I will add my compensatory functional term, and give my reasons for making the change. I will list all of the methods here first and then write about each one separately.

Here are the methods of propaganda:

1. Name Calling 
2. Glittering Generality
3. Transfer
4. Testimonial
5. Plain Folks
6. Card Stacking
7. Band Wagon

To be continued