On Riots In The "UK"

Found an interesting video on Gus T Renegade's Blog it was made by a Youtuber usernamed "flawedelection".

I hope that it is constructive for you.

From a Racist Suspect

Here is a comment that a Racist Suspect left on my page. First off, he posted his comment to a post that had nothing to do with it. That was confusing.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else? While I do not condone Don Imus's stupidity to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles I hate to imagine what would have happened had this event happened to a non white in a white neighborhood. In my case I was told by the Police it was my fault for being in THEIR part of town? So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"- Benjamin

The next confusing thing was that "Benjamin" put question marks at the end of his statements. The codified approach is not to respond to statements, and to answer questions. Did he use question marks, so I that I would attempt to answer them? If so, I'm taking the bait.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else?"-
I've never said that a "white" man saying "nappy headed hoes" is racist. Whoever said that, said what they said and you need to talk to them about that, not me. I do not think that it is okay for someone call anyone a name that they do not want to be called. If I were asked to comment on it, I would have said that "White" man was name calling. As for "black" singers degenerating their own and everybody else, that is the fault of the Racists (White Supremacists) who encourage those singers to believe that the degenerating style of noise that they call "music" is what sells. I suggest that you speak to the shareholders, board members, and the executive teams of Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and the other music companies that dominate the area of Entertainment. They tell the singers what to say and do in their noise, not me. Neeext!
 
"to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles."-

If this did in fact happened to you, it was mistreatment, but it wasn't racism. It was a re-action to Racism (White Supremacy), and not actual Racism. I do not condone that type of re-action. I find it hard to believe that you were attacked for being "white" and the Enforcement Officials did nothing about it, let alone told you that you should not have been there. It just doesn't make sense. If you weren't injured and you could not identify anybody, then what you are saying may make some sense, because they need to have something to go by. I have seen Enforcement Officials go after a bunch of "black" people, when they had nothing else to go by other than they were told the person was "black". Most "black" people know automatically that messing with "white" people will get you in trouble. Also, I have seen plenty of "white" people walking around freely in areas of Richmond CA that some "non-white" people will not even allow other "non-white" people to go in, without having any problems from "non-white" people.

There was a rare situation when I saw a group of "black" males throwing bricks at cars driving through North Richmond, that had "white" people in them. It was in RE-ACTION ( I tried to convince them that such behavior was not constructive) to what happened to Yusef Hawkins and another youth whose name slips my mind . 10 to 15 Enforcement Officials came in and arrested every young "black" male, in the vicinity, except me and another person (because we had on suits). In response to that, the city mowed down some houses and a few other buildings. Then built a huge parkway that runs right through this area today.
The parkway has a 10 foot walls on both sides and cars move through at 60 miles an hour. The White Supremacists showed them who had the power. They basically said "Throw another brick at "White" people and see what happens to this area!" Hell,"Black" people been killing other "Black" with automatic weapons for decades in North Richmond, and can't even a get pot hole in the street filled. But, let some cars owned by "White" people get some bricks thrown at them and it's remodeling time? See the Racism lies in the fact that the "White" people who had the power to stop "Black" people from throwing bricks at "white" people, could to stop "Black" people from killing "Black" people, but they choose not to do so. They would rather say that "Black" people are to blame, and that they are responsible for stopping it. Never mind the fact that it is "White" people who profit from the weapons and ammunition that is used to do the killing.  

"So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"

Racism (White Supremacy) is injustice for everybody. It is a faulty system that promotes deception and violence, which is no constructive for anyone. The only Racism that I am worried about is the one that makes ME a Victim. It is what is uncommonly referred to as FUNCTIONAL RACISM. It's not just me getting the name calling, it's not just me getting the bottles, bricks, and sticks, thrown at me, it's not just me knowing not to be in certain places, because I could be lynched, its not just me getting deceived into and out of things, its not just me walking in fear of racist action, every day, its also my family members going five generations back. All of us have experienced this stuff because we are classified by "white" people as "non-white". Any other kind of what you are calling "Racism" are simple ideologies that are nothing more than the primitive attempts of some "non-white" people who've chosen to REACT to the FUNCTIONAL RACISM that they've experienced.

Are "White" people racially Oppressed?: HELL NO!

This is my response to a CNN article (rated #1 on their "most popular stories right now" list on 3/5/11 @9:01am) that asks the question "Are whites racially oppressed?"

I am baffled at the fact that some "White" people are saying that they are "racially oppressed" these days, because I've been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 42.5 years. My father-less (see page 120 of the U.I.C.C.S.C: Word Guide) was a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years, and my mother-less, currently has been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years. 

I have so much knowledge and experience in being a Victim of White Supremacy, that I earned a PH.D(http://www.counter-racismnow.com/2010/07/for-anyone-who-questions-my-credentials.html ) in it. I thought for sure that by now I knew what it meant to be "Racially Oppressed", but, since these “White” people are saying that they are, maybe it’s true and I just don't know what I’m talking about.

So for purposes of getting to the bottom line let’s assume that it is true that “White” people are “Racially Oppressed”.

This means that I will offer these “Racially Oppressed White People” the benefit of the doubt and investigate their claim. Never mind the fact that on most occasions when I’ve stated that I am "Racially Oppressed", I barely get this same kind of consideration. No news broadcasters have called me to get my story.

Upon hearing my claim to be a Victim of Racism, most of the "White" people, that I have spoken to make comments like:

"Get a job nigger; you have too much time on your hands."

“Slavery was a long time ago, so get over it.”

 “You have Affirmative Action.”

“You have a black president now, so stop whining.”

Wow.

“Are Whites Racially Oppressed?”

Many questions came to my mind when contemplating the answer to this grandest question of all questions. 

1. What does "Racially" mean? 

"Racially" is an adverb of the adjective "Racial", therefore,

The Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition states:

Racial- 1. of, relating to or based on a race.2. existing or occurring between races.

2. What does "oppressed" mean? 

"Oppressed" is the word "oppress" in its past tense, therefore,

 the Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language College Edition states:

Oppress- 1. To weigh heavily on the mind, spirits, or senses of; 2. to keep down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority; burden with harsh, rigorous impositions; tyrannize over. 3. a) To crush; trample down. b) To overpower; subdue.

Okay following the logic:

If “White” people are Racially Oppressed because they are classified as “White”,

Then they are kept “down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority” from “non-white” people dominating and subjugating them in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex, and War.

Correct? (I know, I know, I’m shaking my head too, but let’s play along.)

Before we look at some of the evidence, 

We'll start with the main reason (I suspect) that these people ( not all "white" people) are saying that they are "oppressed".

Most Powerful Victim of Racism (White Supremacy) in the known universe

Was he selected by "White" people to be President?

Yes.

Evidence marked exhibit #1 The President's Cabinet

Look at all of those "Racially Oppressed" "White" people.

If Obama is keeping "White" people down by being cruel and making unjust use of his power or authority, why is not his cabinet filled with "non-white" people?

If he had the kind of power that the smart and powerful Racists had, backing him, he could surround himself with "Wesley Snipes" complexioned people and there would not be a damn thing that anyone could do about it. Now, that would be cruelty.

I've admitted that I am confused about knowing how a "White" person looks. There are many times where I am incorrect about it. I've never seen anyone that was the color of a white piece of paper or a white crayon.

Maybe most of the people in the above pic are all classified as "non-white" people? I don't know. What do you think? I think I need a "White" person to tell me. But since I don't have one available, I'll presume that they are "White" people, because many of the people who've told me that they were "White" have the same skin tone as those they want us to presume are classified as "White". I could be incorrect.

Was the move against "Libya" about keeping "non-white" people from having something real to bring to the table?

How to deal with "White" people. PART 1

The first thing that you want to do is admit the truth to yourself (if you are a "non-white" person), which is, that you are a Victim of Racism in system of Racism / White Supremacy and because of that fact, you are less than one percent as smart as you thought you were.

I know that this position is going to take some getting used to.

Many of you are saying "Oh hell naw, SynQ, if I say that, I'm saying that I am stupid, and I aint stupid."

"I'm too proud of who I am, and who we are, to say that we are victims, SynQ."

"Man, our people built the pyramids. SynQ, we come from kings and queens."

I estimate that for the last 50 or so years, we've been blasted with what has been called "positive thinking". I prefer to use the lesser used term, called the "see and be" technique, because it eliminates confusion.

See the catchy part in this term is the word positive. Because of that word this phrase took off like a wildfire. Especially, amongst "non-white" people. Within this period, a lot of "White" people were openly truthful about the existence of this system, and the ones (they called themselves "White liberals") who appeared to be helping us deal with it, were saying that this system, made us as individuals, have a "low self-esteem".

According to them, having a "low self-esteem", meant that we were too afraid and / or mentally weak to set any goals or pursue any goals if we had any.

I suspect that some of these "White liberals" ran with the idea that we needed to FEEL GOOD about ourselves, because of the accomplishments of others who had the same skin color.

They came up with these "firsts". You know the kind of thing, I'm talking about?

"Hank Aaron was the first black this........Joe Lewis was the first black that."

Their idea in my opinion was to make us more comfortable with the affects of the system. You and I are supposed to FEEL PROUD of ourselves, because of the works of another "black" person. Well, that's a slap in the face, as far as I am concerned.

The same can be said for our history. True, that knowing the history is important. Those who don't know the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them. That is all that you need to know history for.

Okay, I digressed BIG TIME. Well sort of.

The next thing that you want to do is see the "white" person as a Racist Suspect. This is because under the system of Racism (White Supremacy), we've been conditioned through White Supremacist Propaganda to see most "white" people as "innocent" and "trustworthy", merely because they are "White".  No? How many "White" people are there around you, whom you believe will steal from you?  It probably doesn't cross your mind because the propaganda has you thinking that most "white" people have too much money to steal from a "non-white" person. The same can be said for selling or using dope, pimping, killing, lying, etc. Sure there are "white" people doing these things, but is it the first image that comes to your mind when you imagine some one doing them? By no means am I saying that you should see all "white" people as Racists, because not all "white" people are Racists. The only way that you should see one as a Racist is if they admit that they are one, or if another "white" person says that another "white" person is one. Even then you should never call one a Racist (unless they give you permission to), because that would be name calling. It is counter productive to be discourteous to anyone. It is better to just avoid contact. The main point here is that many "white" people who are Racists will not tell you.

The third thing that you want to do is be prepared. That means that you should read up on and / or research whatever subject you intend to deal with them on.
CAUTION: This is not to show them how much you've learned or how much you know on the subject. This is so that your questions can be more precise in order to not give the "white" person any "wiggle room", with their answers. For example- if you are relying on a "white" person to sell you a car, you should learn as much as you can about the process of buying a car, before you go to the dealership. When I used to sell cars it was widely known amongst the employees of the dealership, that "black" people lacked knowledge in negotiation, finance, and about the cars that they were buying (especially if it is a used car). There were "white" car sales people who were known to not deal with anyone except "black" people, because they knew that they'd make a lot of money off of their lack of knowledge. The real deception was that their victims, thought that these sales people were dealing with them, because they cared about "black" people.

The fourth thing that you do, is ask the "white" person to speak slowly and use simple words as though they are speaking to (you like) a third grader. Some of you may find this insulting, however, in most cases we get victimized by White Supremacy, because we are lead to THINK that we are smart when we really aren't. The reason for talking like you are a third grader, is because listening to the ENGLISH language can get very complicated and confusing real quick. If you misunderstand the meaning of just one word in a sentence, you could be thrown off from the point that they were making. Once that happens confusion can set in at a time when you think you understand what is being said, and you wont even know that you are confused.

The fifth thing is to pay close attention to what is being said. In fact, it would be better if you had some kind of recording device. Many people talk extremely fast, even after you've asked them to speak slowly.

The sixth thing is to make no assumptions (during the conversation) about what is being said or done. Ask questions. Ask a whole lot of questions. This actually puts you in control of the situation, because you are learning about the thinking process of the person that you are asking the questions of. If you are paying close attention to what is being said then you can tell whether that person is telling you the truth or using deception. It is not a full proof way, because if a person knows in advance what kind of questions you're going to ask, they may be prepared to give you the answers that will make them sound like they're telling the truth. However, asking questions in most cases puts you in the "drivers seat". It's like your the prosecutor and they're on the stand or your the interviewer and they're the interviewee.

I hope that this is constructive.