____________ is Not A Racist

    The inspiration for this post comes from the Yahoo Sports Article written by "Eurosport Expert" and "Non-white" person, Paul Parker entitled STUART PEARCE IS NOT A RACIST.

 According to his article the "British media" revealed a Racial incident that occurred 18 years ago, whereby a "White" person named Stuart Pearce was accused of mistreating, a Mr. Paul Ince on the basis of color.  

Mr. Parker starts off with the words "I could not help but find the front pages of some of Friday's newspapers anything other than embarrassing."

His statement reflects the usual emotions that are produced under a system of White Supremacy whenever a "White" person is accused of practicing Racism. Counter Racist Compensatory Logic says that whenever a "White" person is accused of practicing Racism, some "Non-white" people feel embarrassed, and some "White" people get angry. It is Mr. Parker's embarrassment that produced this article, which means that it is based on emotion and not logic. I'm not attempting to be critical of Mr. Parker. I want to point out how dangerous (unknowing to him) his article can be to other "Non-white" people who may value his opinion.

Mr. Parker argues that Pearce is not a Racist because:

• It was 18 years ago 
• He knows Pearce and has not been mistreated by him on the basis of color 
• Pearce apologized to Ince for the incident 
• Pearce defended one of his team mates named Des Walker when "One of the opposition said something to Des Walker, something racist."

It was 18 years ago

 "I just cannot understand this attitude of the British media that as soon as someone is elevated to sufficiently high office they are fair game. Even if there is nothing new to smear a person's name with, they will happily trawl through a person's past just to get anything on them.
That is what has happened here with an alleged incident from 18 years ago involving Pearce and Paul Ince during a game between Manchester United and Nottingham Forest."

It appears to me that Parker is saying that Pearce has not practiced Racism (White Supremacy) in 18 years. In order for the logic to start kicking in we must ask questions.

How does Parker know that Pearce has not practiced Racism in 18 years?

It looks like Parker depends on the media to point out Racist incidents.  The media doesn't catch everything. Therefore he cannot know.

Could Pearce be practicing Racism in such a way, that it could go undetected for 18 years?

Yes. The evidence shows that the White Supremacists can use deception to practice Racism (White Supremacy) in a refined way. 

When looking at "White" people who are able to practice Racism, is it possible for a Victim of Racism (White Supremacy), to determine who is and who is not a Racist, while under the system of Racism (White Supremacy)?

I don't think so. I could be incorrect. I do not know of any "Non-white" person who has learned how to make this determination. Such a person would have to know everything about Racism (White Supremacy) what it is, and how it works. That means 100% understanding. Trying to determine who is and who isn't is a waste of time in my opinion.

 As a Victim of Racism under the Global System of White Supremacy you should always be concerned about who, what, when, where, and how you are being victimized whenever you wake up in the morning. Hell, we may be victims in our own damn sleep!



He knows Pearce and has not been mistreated by him on the basis of color

"I played with Stuart for England many times and got to know him well, and I genuinely believe there is absolutely no way he is racist. If he did make any abusive comments to Paul, as was alleged at the time, I would say they may have come out of ignorance at that point, rather than bigotry. I am sure that as a highly respected member of the football community he would not dream of making any such comments now."

The smart and powerful White Supremacists benefit from the confusion that they've promoted about Racism (White Supremacy) being a form of ignorance. This is not correct. Ignorance is the opposite of intelligence. The truth is that Racism (White Supremacy) is a highly sophisticated business. Most of it's practitioners are highly intelligent and competitive business persons who use it to gain an advantage over their victims, in the same way that a Wal-Mart gains an advantage over a small corner store.

As long as the Global System of Racism (White Supremacy) exists any "White" person that is able to practice Racism, can practice Racism, at any time, and any place, in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex, and War.

Could it be that Pearce has practiced Racism against Parker without Parker's knowledge?

Yes.

Could it be that Pearce has practiced Racism against other "Non-white" people without Parker's knowledge?

Yes.

Could it be that Pearce has practiced Racism (White Supremacy) against other victims  and spared Parker?

Yes. Practicing Racism (White Supremacy) is a choice. A Racist Suspect could choose to mistreat you on the basis of color, and leave all other "Non-white" people alone or they could choose to not mistreat you, and mistreat all others. Still thirdly, they could choose to not mistreat anybody at all. It is their choice (and the choice that we want them to make).

Could it be that Pearce has not mistreated anyone on the basis of skin color?

Absolutely. It is possible. Racism is a choice.

Can Parker decide that Pearce is not a Racist?

Yes. His article is the evidence that proves he has made that decision. Pearce may or may not have deceived him into believing that. It is unlikely that we would ever know.

Can other "Non-white" people (including you) decide that Pearce is still a Racist?

Yes. It is totally up to you. You can join Parker and decide that he's not one if you'd like.

It is left up to each and every individual "Non-white" person to decide who is and who is not a Racist.

You have what we call Victims Guaranteed Qualifications. We have Mr. Edward Williams to explain below.





Is it logical while under the Global System of White Supremacy for a Victim of Racism to decide who is and who is not a Racist?

NO! Why? because in my opinion it is a complete waste of time. You and I do not have the tools to determine such a thing, other than asking a "White" person who is able to mistreat you, if they are in  fact going to mistreat or / are mistreating you. What do you look like asking a suspected burglar if they are going to burglarize your house? He or she could answer yes, but then that would be a stupid ass burglar now wouldn't it? or at the least a sarcastic one.

It's seldom (these days) that a Racist has revealed the truth about what they were going to do or have done to their victims. Many of them claiming that they've "turned over a new leaf" or some who merely have the nerve to tell it like it is. Either way we don't have any measurable way to tell if they are telling us the truth or deceiving us further.

Following Counter Racist Compensatory Logic, as long as the System of Racism (White Supremacy) exists, all "White" people should be viewed as Racist Suspects. The evidence shows that millions of Victims of Racism didn't find out that they had been victimized by the Racists, until long after the fact. In other words it was through trial and error. Which means a lot of mistakes were made, time, and energy wasted.

Deciding that a "White" person is not a Racist, while under the system of White Supremacy is highly dangerous, because the #1 tool for practicing Racism is Deception. This would allow them to mistreat you further, without your knowledge, because you dropped your guard.

Equally, and in balance, which is Justice.

Deciding that a "White" person is a Racist, while under the system of White Supremacy is highly dangerous, because they may not be a Racist and your actions have turned them into one or you could be incorrect for other reasons. The key is for them to take all action necessary to produce Justice (balance between people). It is illogical to form conclusions without evidence. It makes one look foolish. Now, if a "White" person admits that they are a Racist, then okay. I guess that's your evidence.


Pearce apologized to Ince for the incident

Okay, but, Victims of Racism can remain traumatized from Racist Actions for decades. It still does not take Pearce off the suspect list.

Pearce defended one of his team mates named Des Walker when "One of the opposition said something to Des Walker, something racist."

This can be confusing. I have observed a Racist Suspect be polite to a "Non-white" person, but then turn around and mistreat me. Also when I was 15 years old, I witnessed a Racist Suspect talk about it being a good idea to throw a grenade into a movie theater "full of niggers". He forgot that I was present and I said "Hey, wait a minute!". He responded "I didn't mean you, you're cool. A nigger is a black asshole."  I fell for that Racist Mind Trick, thinking I'm not an asshole and saying "Oh, okay."

I may have made this point earlier, but, just because a Racist Suspect isn't mistreating you on the basis of color doesn't mean that they aren't mistreating others on that basis.

To eliminate the slow process of trial and error when trying to determine who is and who is not a Racist, it is best to treat them all as Racist Suspects and keep them on the list of suspects until the system of injustice has been eliminated. No need to argue, if you disagree. V.G.Q. Remember?

You (and Parker) can take them off or leave them on. It's all up to you. I'm leaving them on it.

I've repeated this over and over in order to make it stick.  I hope this post was constructive.

Stay Strong In The Struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice.

From a Racist Suspect

Here is a comment that a Racist Suspect left on my page. First off, he posted his comment to a post that had nothing to do with it. That was confusing.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else? While I do not condone Don Imus's stupidity to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles I hate to imagine what would have happened had this event happened to a non white in a white neighborhood. In my case I was told by the Police it was my fault for being in THEIR part of town? So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"- Benjamin

The next confusing thing was that "Benjamin" put question marks at the end of his statements. The codified approach is not to respond to statements, and to answer questions. Did he use question marks, so I that I would attempt to answer them? If so, I'm taking the bait.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else?"-
I've never said that a "white" man saying "nappy headed hoes" is racist. Whoever said that, said what they said and you need to talk to them about that, not me. I do not think that it is okay for someone call anyone a name that they do not want to be called. If I were asked to comment on it, I would have said that "White" man was name calling. As for "black" singers degenerating their own and everybody else, that is the fault of the Racists (White Supremacists) who encourage those singers to believe that the degenerating style of noise that they call "music" is what sells. I suggest that you speak to the shareholders, board members, and the executive teams of Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and the other music companies that dominate the area of Entertainment. They tell the singers what to say and do in their noise, not me. Neeext!
 
"to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles."-

If this did in fact happened to you, it was mistreatment, but it wasn't racism. It was a re-action to Racism (White Supremacy), and not actual Racism. I do not condone that type of re-action. I find it hard to believe that you were attacked for being "white" and the Enforcement Officials did nothing about it, let alone told you that you should not have been there. It just doesn't make sense. If you weren't injured and you could not identify anybody, then what you are saying may make some sense, because they need to have something to go by. I have seen Enforcement Officials go after a bunch of "black" people, when they had nothing else to go by other than they were told the person was "black". Most "black" people know automatically that messing with "white" people will get you in trouble. Also, I have seen plenty of "white" people walking around freely in areas of Richmond CA that some "non-white" people will not even allow other "non-white" people to go in, without having any problems from "non-white" people.

There was a rare situation when I saw a group of "black" males throwing bricks at cars driving through North Richmond, that had "white" people in them. It was in RE-ACTION ( I tried to convince them that such behavior was not constructive) to what happened to Yusef Hawkins and another youth whose name slips my mind . 10 to 15 Enforcement Officials came in and arrested every young "black" male, in the vicinity, except me and another person (because we had on suits). In response to that, the city mowed down some houses and a few other buildings. Then built a huge parkway that runs right through this area today.
The parkway has a 10 foot walls on both sides and cars move through at 60 miles an hour. The White Supremacists showed them who had the power. They basically said "Throw another brick at "White" people and see what happens to this area!" Hell,"Black" people been killing other "Black" with automatic weapons for decades in North Richmond, and can't even a get pot hole in the street filled. But, let some cars owned by "White" people get some bricks thrown at them and it's remodeling time? See the Racism lies in the fact that the "White" people who had the power to stop "Black" people from throwing bricks at "white" people, could to stop "Black" people from killing "Black" people, but they choose not to do so. They would rather say that "Black" people are to blame, and that they are responsible for stopping it. Never mind the fact that it is "White" people who profit from the weapons and ammunition that is used to do the killing.  

"So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"

Racism (White Supremacy) is injustice for everybody. It is a faulty system that promotes deception and violence, which is no constructive for anyone. The only Racism that I am worried about is the one that makes ME a Victim. It is what is uncommonly referred to as FUNCTIONAL RACISM. It's not just me getting the name calling, it's not just me getting the bottles, bricks, and sticks, thrown at me, it's not just me knowing not to be in certain places, because I could be lynched, its not just me getting deceived into and out of things, its not just me walking in fear of racist action, every day, its also my family members going five generations back. All of us have experienced this stuff because we are classified by "white" people as "non-white". Any other kind of what you are calling "Racism" are simple ideologies that are nothing more than the primitive attempts of some "non-white" people who've chosen to REACT to the FUNCTIONAL RACISM that they've experienced.

Are "White" people racially Oppressed?: HELL NO!

This is my response to a CNN article (rated #1 on their "most popular stories right now" list on 3/5/11 @9:01am) that asks the question "Are whites racially oppressed?"

I am baffled at the fact that some "White" people are saying that they are "racially oppressed" these days, because I've been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 42.5 years. My father-less (see page 120 of the U.I.C.C.S.C: Word Guide) was a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years, and my mother-less, currently has been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years. 

I have so much knowledge and experience in being a Victim of White Supremacy, that I earned a PH.D(http://www.counter-racismnow.com/2010/07/for-anyone-who-questions-my-credentials.html ) in it. I thought for sure that by now I knew what it meant to be "Racially Oppressed", but, since these “White” people are saying that they are, maybe it’s true and I just don't know what I’m talking about.

So for purposes of getting to the bottom line let’s assume that it is true that “White” people are “Racially Oppressed”.

This means that I will offer these “Racially Oppressed White People” the benefit of the doubt and investigate their claim. Never mind the fact that on most occasions when I’ve stated that I am "Racially Oppressed", I barely get this same kind of consideration. No news broadcasters have called me to get my story.

Upon hearing my claim to be a Victim of Racism, most of the "White" people, that I have spoken to make comments like:

"Get a job nigger; you have too much time on your hands."

“Slavery was a long time ago, so get over it.”

 “You have Affirmative Action.”

“You have a black president now, so stop whining.”

Wow.

“Are Whites Racially Oppressed?”

Many questions came to my mind when contemplating the answer to this grandest question of all questions. 

1. What does "Racially" mean? 

"Racially" is an adverb of the adjective "Racial", therefore,

The Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition states:

Racial- 1. of, relating to or based on a race.2. existing or occurring between races.

2. What does "oppressed" mean? 

"Oppressed" is the word "oppress" in its past tense, therefore,

 the Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language College Edition states:

Oppress- 1. To weigh heavily on the mind, spirits, or senses of; 2. to keep down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority; burden with harsh, rigorous impositions; tyrannize over. 3. a) To crush; trample down. b) To overpower; subdue.

Okay following the logic:

If “White” people are Racially Oppressed because they are classified as “White”,

Then they are kept “down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority” from “non-white” people dominating and subjugating them in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex, and War.

Correct? (I know, I know, I’m shaking my head too, but let’s play along.)

Before we look at some of the evidence, 

We'll start with the main reason (I suspect) that these people ( not all "white" people) are saying that they are "oppressed".

Most Powerful Victim of Racism (White Supremacy) in the known universe

Was he selected by "White" people to be President?

Yes.

Evidence marked exhibit #1 The President's Cabinet

Look at all of those "Racially Oppressed" "White" people.

If Obama is keeping "White" people down by being cruel and making unjust use of his power or authority, why is not his cabinet filled with "non-white" people?

If he had the kind of power that the smart and powerful Racists had, backing him, he could surround himself with "Wesley Snipes" complexioned people and there would not be a damn thing that anyone could do about it. Now, that would be cruelty.

I've admitted that I am confused about knowing how a "White" person looks. There are many times where I am incorrect about it. I've never seen anyone that was the color of a white piece of paper or a white crayon.

Maybe most of the people in the above pic are all classified as "non-white" people? I don't know. What do you think? I think I need a "White" person to tell me. But since I don't have one available, I'll presume that they are "White" people, because many of the people who've told me that they were "White" have the same skin tone as those they want us to presume are classified as "White". I could be incorrect.

Should a "White" person be viewed as a Racist Suspect?

Answer: Yes.

Counter Racist Compensatory Logic says that under the system of White Supremacy, a "non-white" person does not have the ability (Some "non-white" people will disagree with me on whether we possess such an ability or not. That's okay, but, we will not go into that topic here.) to determine who is and who is not a Racist, therefore any person classified as "White", should be viewed as a Racist Suspect.

Kevin Malone

However, it is up to the individual "non-white" person to decide if a "White" person should remain on the Racist suspect list or not. One "White" person could choose not to mistreat me on the basis of skin color, and on the other hand that same "White" person could mistreat you (another "non-white" person) on the basis of yours. And on the next day (hour, min, sec, etc.), I could be their target of mistreatment, instead of you.

I site today's article from www.racismdaily.com as evidence to support the reason why as long as the system of White Supremacy exists, a "White" person should always be viewed as a Racist Suspect.

The 51 year old Racist Suspect (Kevin Malone) accused of mistreating a 14 year old "non-white" person, was viewed as a friend by Ms. Phylis Pearson (a "black" female). Learn more about this incident by clicking here.

A part of the article says-

"Village Trustee Phyllis Pearson, who had served on the Village Board with Malone’s wife, JoAnn, said she was disappointed in her friend.

Pearson said it would be in Malone’s best interest for him to resign.

“He stooped to the child’s level,” said Pearson, who is black.

Pearson said people previously told her Kevin Malone was racist but she hadn’t ever seen him display that type of behavior before."

The Racist Suspect is also a "Democrat", which from my observation has been a often used term that deceives many "Non-white" people into believing that the "White" person who claims this position will not practice White Supremacy.

At the age of 12 I had more friends that were classified as "White", than I had friends that were classified as "Non-white". Many of the "White" ones let me know at some point, that they didn't like niggers, but that I was okay, because I was "different". Oftentimes when I heard them use the word, it was at times that they were so engrossed in conversation with another "non-black" person, that they forgot I was present.

"Hey...Hey, why do they have to be called niggers?"

Two of them, who did not know each other and on separate occasions, gave me the same definition of what a nigger was, when I asked them what made me different?

"A nigger is a black asshole. You're not an asshole"

At that time, I was all too happy to hear that they didn't see me as a nigger. My emotions ( a mixture of anger, embarrassment, sadness and happiness) prevented me from asking more questions. It was as though I had fell victim to some kind of "Jedi Mind trick" (Wow, "White" people like me, but hate other "black" people? Yeh!).  Hey, these guys were telling me that I was better than other "black" people and that it was okay. You know that when you have the "White man's stamp of approval" it's all good. Those same two guys and a few other "White" people that I associated with back in those days, didn't hesitate to call me a nigger whenever I did something that upset them. It would be at those times that I'd get physical. My folks told me that if I get physical or even angry behind their use of the word, then I lose the battle. Oops, I digressed BIG TIME.

The point is that under the system of Racism (White Supremacy), a "Non-white" person can not determine who is a Racist and who is not a Racist, though that "Non-white" person can choose to remove a "White" person from the Racist Suspect list, it is not recommended.

It is up to the "White" person to make this determination, by making a conscious effort not to mistreat someone on the basis of skin color, in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity.

Stay Strong in the struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Frederick Jermaine Carter's Death Ruled A Hanging And Not A Suicide

What else is news? We knew all along that it was not a suicide.


Click here for What Happened to Fredrick Jermaine Carter?

Click here for brief info on How To Deal With Lynchings

Listen to internet radio with The COWS on Blog Talk Radio