Counter Racism Now! Campaigns

Monday, February 28, 2011

I was on the C.O.W.S. Radio Show Again !

Listen to internet radio with Gus T Renegade on Blog Talk Radio
I could be incorrect, but I do not think that many of the people who participate in the discussions on the C.O.W.S. are "codified", meaning that I do not think that many of them have actually read or attempt to practice the UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE- Textbook / Workbook. They could have read it and whether they have or not does not matter to the extent of having Victims Guaranteed Qualifications. However, we have got to start moving in a direction that gets us further, than where we have gotten. This means that you should not voice whatever it is that you think the U.I.C.C./S./C. is until you have read it entirely. It would be correct to quote it, as long as you do not make it appear that it came from you, instead of Fuller. If there are parts of the code that you do not agree with and you offer something else instead, state clearly those parts, and make it clear that, whatever it is that you are offering is coming from you and not the code book, so that others will not be confused about it. Confusion cooperates with Racism (White Supremacy). The idea that all "White" people are Racists (White Supremacists) does not come from the U.I.C.C./S./C. The U.I.C.C./S./C. states on page 20 that there are three basic types of people in the known universe:
  1. "White" people
  2. "Non-white" people
  3. White Supremacists (Racists)
Simply say: "I do not agree with the code when it says that there are three basic types of people in the known universe, I only think that there are two basic types."- and then state your reasons why. But, this must be advertised constantly enough, so that people do not believe that it is from the code. I spoke with Mr. Fuller in detail this morning about this. He stated that he sometimes gets calls from people questioning him about ideas that have (either directly or indirectly) been made to appear like they came from the code book, when such ideas have not. In the last paragraph on page one of the U.I.C.C./S./C. it says: "This is not a book to be used to promote dislike or hatred for white people. This is not a book to be used to encourage animosity toward white people or to promote a dislike for white people because of their "whiteness", and / or because they appear to be "White" to the eye/mind of the onlooker." In my opinion, viewing all "White" people as Racists can encourage animosity toward "White" people. Somehow, I suspect that some people are under the impression that because I once viewed Shirley Temple and other "White" females as my objects of affection, that I am in "love" with "White" people. That was a long time ago. I do not "love" them, nor do I "hate" them. Because I suspect that I was extremely misunderstood when I was talking about Katie, I must reiterate that I suspected she was being guided by other "White" people both indirectly and directly to learn how to practice Racism (White Supremacy). I do not believe that at the age of 10, she was practicing Racism (White Supremacy) on her own and at will. Because I have observed that "White" people usually have Racism (White Supremacy) figured out by the time they are 15 years old. I could be incorrect. The point is that she knows that she is a "white" person. If one believes that all "white" people are Racists then one, will believe that she is a Racist, right now, and thus will be blinded to the point that I am attempting to make here. The idea is to force "white" people in the direction of Justice. A "white" person who practices Racism, has to be given a way to change the way that that they do business (and start producing Justice). If one sees all "white" people as Racists, and not Racist Suspects, then it becomes difficult to see what should be done to get Justice, in my opinion. I definitely do not believe that practicing Racism is "in their DNA!" Racism (White Supremacy) is a learned behavior, it is not genetic. When Victims of Racism keep believing in the concept of "Race", they indirectly promote Race-ism (White Supremacy), because Racism thrives off of the idea that all of the people on the planet think, speak, and act differently, because of their genetic make-up . We were taught by the White Supremacists (Racists) to think this way. This is part of our mistreatment, because it keeps us thinking inside the box called Racism (White Supremacy). I agree with the U.I.C.C./S./C. in what it says under the words "Some Questions and Answers Relative to 'Racial' Compensation" on page 12.- It's too long to type, so You'll have to read it for yourself. The only "gene" that makes "White" people and "Non-white" people differ is literally skin deep! It is that "gene" that makes my skin brown and theirs pale, some "White" people have named such a "gene","Melanin". Last night on Gus' show I heard a lot of emotional words and one term directed at "White" people as to the reason they commit Racism (White Supremacy). I even heard people translate what I said about "White" people into emotional words and terms, that I did not use. I heard: "We should not worry about how "White" people feel."
"That refined Racist's blood was boiling..........."
"'White' people [practice Racism], because they fear us." After a few minutes all I heard was: "They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us." The point that I attempted to make about fear, is that for me, when I discover that I fear something, I work to eliminate that fear anyway that I can, because I know that fear is an obstacle in my path to completing my objective, and if I have something at my disposal to remove that fear I will use it without hesitation. Following the logic on this would lead me to believe that if the smart and powerful Racists feared "Black" people today, they would wipe us out with no hesitation. They've already experimented doing such things:
  1. in 1921 the Racists dropped a bomb on so-called "Tulsa, Oklahoma", killing 3,000 "non-white" people, who fought to defend themselves against the destruction of people and property.
  2. in 1945 the Racists dropped a nuclear bomb, killing 90,000–166,000 "non-white" people in so-called "Hiroshima" and  dropped another bomb, killing 60,000–80,000 "non-white" people in so-called "Nagasaki".
  3. in 1979 they convinced  close to 1,000 "non-white" people to kill themselves by drinking cyanide laced kool-aid, in so-called "Jonestown, Guyana".
If they "feared" us before these events (there's plenty more evidence), they sure as hell have some courage now. The way that the Cress-theory of color confrontation was implied last night, was not logical, but emotional. The theory itself may or may not have been true. I say that its major purpose is to boost the ego of the Victims who believe it. Dr.Welsing states in THE ISIS PAPERS on page 13 that having an understanding of her theory "will have profound effects on the developing egos and self-images of all non-white children, who suffer severe damage under white supremacy culture." (Best believe that my male offspring's ego and self-image will be boosted!, but then we'll have to move on to the logic.) She further states that it "allows non-whites to to gain psychological liberation from white ideological domination that negatively affects the total functioning of non-whites." She continues on to say that "white peoples of the world presumably also could benefit from such awareness of the motivation behind behaviors that often baffle them. If they are sincere in their attempts to stop the practices of white supremacy (racism), whites may be able to find methods to do so once the cause is understood." Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat!!!   Did she say in the second paragraph from the bottom of page 13-"white peoples of the world presumably also could benefit from such awareness of the motivation behind behaviors that often baffle them." ? - Does this mean that Dr. Welsing suspects that some "white" people are not aware as to what motivates them to practice Racism? If that is the case, can some "white" people practice Racism and not be aware that they are doing so? "Non-white" people bragging that "White" people fear us, is no different than the analogy that Fuller uses in the below video: Since when has the person that makes all of the guns and ammunition been afraid of the person that doesn't have the guns and ammunition? What is the purpose in being the maker of guns and ammunition? I kept saying last night: Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! I agree that at one time (centuries ago), the smart and powerful Racists, amongst the "White" people collectively feared "Non-white" people. As stated in the below video. The Causes of Racism Though, I agree that the Cress Theory of "White" Genetic Survival or something similar was  the motivation behind the "Causes of Racism", such thinking has since left (Dr. Welsing, sites that the global system of white supremacy has been around for the last 2,000 years.) the minds of the Sophisticated Racists aka Smart and Powerful Racists, when they did the following: The Establishment of Racism White Supremacy Many of the Unsophisticated Racists openly profess their fears with what they call the fourteen words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children" But, what they (and huge numbers of "non-white" people) don't realize is that their existence as a "Race" has already been secured. "White" people collectively today are breathing air for much longer periods of time, than "Black" people. The book "Dying While Black" is filled with evidence to support this claim. All of this while the majority of us participate in non-constructive Entertainment. I contend that at the current time "White" people have nothing to worry about, and the smart and powerful ones know this with out a doubt. The smart and powerful Racists have set so many things in motion, that "Non-white" people are dying in huge numbers from illnesses and poverty. And in the so-called "United States" there are 300+ million "white" people compared to 40 million "Black" people. They aren't letting us "genetically annihilate" anyone, and they know it. These days Racism (White Supremacy) exists for no other purpose than to mistreat people on the basis of color. - I added more words below on 3/4/11---------------------------------------------------------------------- My point is that the smart and powerful Racists who are amongst the "White" collective are the ones who do not fear us. Sure, there are many unsophisticated Racists and Racist Suspects who fear us. But, not all "White" people fear us. This idea that they are is too general to be logical. Any Racist who practices Racism because of fearing "non-white" people is merely practicing one of the many methods of  practicing Racism (White Supremacy). If one views that all "white" people are Racists, then one cannot see the many other methods of Racism that exist. If one cannot see the many other methods of Racism (White Supremacy) that exist, then one cannot be precise in countering it, because they cannot see the details. Logic came with the universe, but, that does not mean that it is something that one makes up right on the spot.
My position on Katie stands with the opinion that Katie is not confused about being a "White" person, because she is in a system of Racism (White Supremacy). Logically speaking such a system cannot produce "White" people who are confused about being "White". At the same time because I do not agree that all "White" people are Racists, I can clearly see that some Racists are helping Katie learn how to practice Racism (White Supremacy).  For Example-The “White” woman  that approached Katie in the park, helped Katie to identify as a “White” person by deliberately going past Mr. Riding ( a "non-white" person and her so-called "parent") asking her direct questions without getting permission from Mr. Riding to speak to Katie, his adoptive child.  This "White" woman at that moment was mistreating Mr. Riding on the basis of color. I am pretty sure that Katie observed what happened. One day (when she is grown up) her turn could come where she could see another "White" child in the same situation that she was in, and at that moment decide to act the same way that the "White" woman acted (and be a Racist), or she could approach the "non-white" male, with courtesy, and ask him about the child, instead.
------------------------end of new words added on 3/4/11-------------------------------------------------- I could be incorrect, but, it appeared to me that many of the C.O.W.S. participants in last night's discussion, believe that "Non-white" people are made up into "Races" of people. "Non-white" people do not have the power to function as a "Race" in a system of RACE-ism (White Supremacy). A "Race" is like a club made up of people that have exclusive privileges that no one outside that "Race" is entitled to. There are two basic re-actions to Racism (White Supremacy):
  1. Cooperation with
  2. Resistance to
How does being apart of a "Race", resist against a system of RACE-ism? How does not being apart of a "Race", co-operate with a system of RACE-ism? All attempted "codified" (meaning the you have read the U.I.C.C./S./C.) persons should be finding out what thoughts, speech, and /or actions cooperate with Racism, eliminate them, and then start developing the kind that resist it. I always think that being on the C.O.W.S. show is constructive, because it offers the opportunity for "non-white" people to come together to exchange views on Racism (White Supremacy). However, I absolutely look forward to the day where by such an exchange is so codified and refined, that whether some of us believe that all "White" people are Racists, and some of us don't, that some of us believe that "White" people fear us, or that some of us don't, we move from the circular thought process (which works like a dog chasing his tale), to the linear thought process that Dr. Welsing mentions in Chapter 12 of  THE ISIS PAPERS, entitled "Black Fear and the Failure of Black Analytical (Ideological) Commitment" Stay Strong In The Struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Fuller's Word Guide is out!

The much anticipated Word Guide that Mr. Fuller has been working on for years, is finally completed and available. It goes by the same title as Fuller's first book, except it's subtitle is different. In other words both book titles begin with "The United Independent Compensatory Code / System / Concept", but differ in the fact that first book is subtitled "A textbook/workbook for thought, speech, and /or action, for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy)" and this new book is subtitled "A Counter Racist Compensatory Word Guide". To distinguish them (reduce the amount of typing), I will refer to the first book as the Textbook/Workbook and the second book as the Word Guide from this point on. At this time, The Word Guide can only be obtained exclusively from Mr.Fuller or his assistant. You can order a copy by printing out and mailing this order form. I was told by his assistant that Mr. Fuller will soon have a website up where you can obtain this new work, in addition to the Textbook/ Workbook. I've already ordered my copy. If it is of any interest to you, some of them are autographed (his assistant's idea) by Mr. Fuller. I'll just be glad to put the contents of the book to some constructive use! If there is one thing that you should learn about the code (I have heard Fuller say this himself) is that it isn't about Fuller. I could be incorrect, but, autographing an item is akin to the first Show-Offism listed in the "four basic Show-Off-isms" on page 41, of the U.I.C.C.S.C:Textbook /Workbook. Anyway, the Word Guide is a supplement to the Textbook/Workbook, and therefore useless without it, so I highly recommend that you purchase and read, the Textbook/Workbook first. Here is the synopsis for the Word Guide: "The 'word-tools' presented in this Work are specifically intended to assist the user in thinking, speaking, and/or acting in a manner that best helps the process of replacing The System of White Supremacy (Racism) with The System of Justice (balance between people). There is reason to believe that the 'best language' for any people to teach, learn, and use, is language that does the most to (1) guarantee that no person is mistreated; and (2) guarantee that the person who needs help the most, gets the most [constructive] help." Stay Strong in your struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice (R.W.S.W.J.)

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Dealing with Lynchings

"Of the many inhuman outrages of this present year, the only case where the proposed lynching did not occur, was where the men armed themselves in Jacksonville, Fla., and Paducah, Ky, and prevented it. The only times an Afro-American who was assaulted got away has been when he had a gun and used it in self-defense. The lesson this teaches and which every Afro-American should ponder well, is that a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give. When the white man who is always the aggressor knows he runs as great a risk of biting the dust every time his Afro-American victim does, he will have greater respect for Afro-American life. The more the Afro-American yields and cringes and begs, the more he has to do so, the more he is insulted, outraged and lynched."- Ida B. Wells 1892

This blog is in response to the most recent lynching of a "black" male. His name was Frederick Jermaine Carter. His death (like all of the other hangings of "black" males within the past 30 years was ruled a suicide).
Hanging victim Frederick Jermaine Carter

The last way that a "black" person would choose to commit suicide would be by hanging, in my opinion. We should no longer be surprised about these kinds of situations, especially in places like Mississippi.

Every "Black" person old enough to learn how to use a firearm, should own a firearm. I suspect that one of the reasons that many "black" males are lured into committing felonious acts is so that they cannot acquire a firearm. So stay away from anything that can get you a felony.

Find out what the firearms laws are in your state and proceed to follow them in the process of acquiring your firearms. That means acquiring a permit if need be. Attempt to get a concealed carry permit in your state. Become a card carrying member of the National Rifle Association. Then start or join a local gun club.

DO NOT BREAK ANY LAWS in your process, because you the "non-white" person can easily get caught up, and placed in Greater Confinement. By all means necessary stay out of areas where you are not wanted, unless you absolutely have to go there to do something constructive. It does appear that Mr. Carter was there to work and he wasn't alone, which is the other suggestion(to not be alone in such areas). But, he walked off. Never walk off! Stick close to your partner and maintain constant contact if you have to be alone (like a restroom break for instance), for a small time.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

We Can Never Forget the Terror That Continues

We can never forget the terror that continues to motivate the F.E.A.R.*( of Death), that lies behind the in-actions of Victims of Racism (White Supremacy) who want to resist Racism (White Supremacy), but have not yet converted that want into the burning desire that is needed to do so. The link below may help them to increase that desire. I sure hope so.

History of "Strange Fruit" documentary

"Strange Fruit" Lyrics
Southern trees bear strange fruit
Lynched Victim of Racism Micheal Donald
Blood on the leaves and blood at the root
Black bodies swinging in the southern breeze
Strange fruit hanging from the popular trees

Pastoral scene of the gallant south
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh

Here is a fruit for the crows to pluck
For the rain to gather, for the wind to suck
For the sun to rot, for the trees to drop
Here is a strange and bitter crop

*F-alse E-xpectations A-ppearing to be R-eal

Saturday, November 06, 2010

Johannes Mehserle gets two years for killing a Victim of Racism (White Supremacy)

White ex-officer's sentence spurs Oakland protest

I am not surprised at all. Same old shit just a different day. Oscar Grant joins the pantheon of others murdered by Enforcement Officials, who's families received injustice. Grant's family will file a wrongful death suit against Mehserle. I wouldn't be surprised if they got injustice in that case too, but making the attempt is constructive.

Mehserle said that he couldn't tell the difference between his firearm and his taser.

His firearm was a .40 caliber Sig P226, it weighs 34.0 oz, and his Taser X26?

Weighs a whopping, seven ounces!

They even look different. states that "the holsters cops use are equipped with multiple mechanisms to prevent a gun from slipping out. The gun itself requires several motions to discharge. Mehserle’s gun weighed 1.7 pounds more than his Taser, and the weapons were plainly distinguishable from each other in both size and color. Further, Mehserle knowingly pulled his Taser out of its holster twice that night. Twice he was able to correctly identify where his Taser was on his duty belt. Twice he unholstered it, flipped the safety switch off and aimed it at Oscar Grant—who caught an image of Mehserle pointing the Taser on his fiancee’s cell phone, the last photo Grant ever took. Twice, Mehserle was able to return his Taser to his holster successfully."

It has been said that Grant was resisting arrest. I don't see it. But, of course, (since me and Mr.Grant are both classified as "black", combined with the countless number of times that Enforcement Officials throughout history have killed "black" males, because the officers involved had a total disregard for their existence.) my eyes are blinded to his resistance, because of my "bias".

Below is one of the same videos that the all Racist Suspect jury that charged Mesherle with involuntary manslaughter, watched with "unbiased" eyes.

Look at the video. Does it look like Grant's is resisting arrest? or is he attempting to show something to B.A.R.T. Enforcement Officials? Why does the officer tell Grant to "sit the fuck down" and follow up with an unnecessary kick to his body?

"As Grant family attorney John Burris said at yesterday’s press conference, 'In my long history being involved in police matters since 1979 and well over 30 homicides with police, never have I had a case when a police officer was convicted of any crime against an African American male.' Given that history, Burris argued, even the involuntary manslaughter conviction is a breakthrough for police accountability."

Thursday, October 07, 2010

Race War

You need to know, that all over the planet,if you are a "non-white" person, that there are Racists preparing to kill you. Many years ago in the late seventies, I remember seeing news clips of Racist Suspects practicing with firearms in the woods. When asked by the reporter what were they practicing for, they responded "To kill niggers in the coming Race War".

Since then I have had two Racist Suspects pull guns out on me as they called me nigger. Both times they used deception to get me in range. The first time I was 12 years old, riding my bike when I heard this voice say "Hey, turn around!" I turned and saw a door to a house, on my right, cracked open. I couldn't see who was on the other end, but I could hear the person mumbling something. I got closer to listen. The barrel of a rifle eased out through the door while its wielder shouted "I said hold it right there, nigger!" I pissed my pants a little and froze. I didn't know what to do. Then my instincts said "let him shoot you running". I rode off fast as I could. I told my Dad and he called the "police". They picked us up and I took them there. The Enforcement Official immediately knew who it was and said "Oh he's a troubled kid, don't worry about it." and took us back to our house. They did nothing.

The other time was when I was selling the Final Call Newspaper. A person that I presumed was "white" asked me what was I selling. I had no problem telling him because plenty of "white" people had bought the Final Call from me before. I walked up to his car to show it to him, then he pointed a 357 Magnum at me and said "Get the fuck away from my car, nigger!"  I froze. The light turned green and he drove off.

The evidence (thousands of lynchings) shows us that we are at war, but, it can't be stressed enough that there are Racists with guns who are preparing to use them on you, especially in situations of chaos.

Some "black" people were killed in the Katrina aftermath by Racist Suspects who saw opportunities to "defend their neighborhoods". The guy ("RV") in the below video is an admitted Racist(White Supremacist). Pay close attention to what he is saying and doing. Word for word. Then go out and arm yourself, if you haven't already. If you have firearms, practice, practice, practice, and then practice again!

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Does the system of Racism (White Supremacy) exist?

I am constantly asked by Racist Suspects and the "non-white" people who worship them to "prove" that the system exists. Most of these Racist Suspects already know that it does, but behave as though it doesn't to confuse "non-white" people about it's existence. If one follows the logic, one will see that it is here. Anyway, here are a collection of videos from YouTube that I present as evidence that it does on fact exist. Below is a "playlist" of videos. They all follow behind each other, after you press play.

Monday, October 04, 2010

"When You Got Them By The Balls Their Hearts And Minds Will Follow"

I first heard this quote at the age of five. It made me laugh real hard. I'd make a loud chuckle and role around on the floor every time I heard it. I suspect that it was the word "balls" that did it. This morning, I did a little research on this phrase by way of Google. It didn't take much digging into the origin of this quote to learn that it's creation is a mystery, some say Teddy Roosevelt, others say Lyndon Banes Johnson, John Wayne, Richard Nixon or some other guy that worked for Nixon made the term. Here's what I found on the internet.

The phrase was one of my father's favorites. He used to say it a lot back in his "revolutionary" days (late 60's and 70's). He loved this quote, so much that he had it made into a plaque and conspicuously placed it on the living room wall beside the front door of our house, so that he could read it everyday just before he stepped outside into the world. I had many chances to ask my Dad what this quote meant to him, but it did not come to my mind until yesterday.

Unfortunately, Dad passed away in March of this year. He would have turned 69 on the 27th of September. There were many things that I still wanted to know about him, but, to be honest, I didn't have the nerve to ask. As a child he raised me in a way that would make me feel uncomfortable about asking certain questions about him, and sometimes he'd get angry about it. Not knowing beforehand which questions he'd approve of, left me to decide early on in my existence NOT to ask many. His behavior in this matter did change within the last 15 years of contact that he and I shared. Though, not asking became a regular habit for me, I learned to ask when he was in a mood to talk about himself. I wish now that I had stepped outside of my comfort zone and asked him, at other times. There is so much more about him that I wanted to know. I'm not saying that he didn't help me answer a lot of questions about other things, because he did, but most of the answers came by way of him directing me toward a book on whatever subject that I sought answers to.

He is with the ancestors, and now I have to attempt to communicate with him through the traditional process, which is much more different and difficult for me to do, as compared to a face to face conversation.  I should say that he didn't like answering questions about himself, until the later years.

To those of you who still have acting parents (even grandparents for that matter) who are breathing at the time of this writing and were around during the "Jim Crow" refinement / maintenance period of the system , I highly recommend that you ask them at least 200 questions about their experiences with Racism (White Supremacy), to help us in the process of eliminating it. Also, encourage your offspring to ask you and others a lot of questions about everything, and if their questions get on your nerves, it is important that you don't let them see that it does. If you do not know the answer, tell them.

My reason for posting the quote is so that Victims of Racism should take note, that it applies to the position that the managers of the system of Racism / White Supremacy are constantly working to keep us in. I think that my Dad's objective when he was a so-called revolutionary was to attempt to get the Racists in that position. We have to get effective numbers of people ( "non-white"first and "white" second) to force the "hearts and minds" of the Racist (White Supremacists) to stop all unjust actions.

A lot of you will disagree but, we have to get effective numbers of "non-white" people to start thinking, speaking, and acting in a manner that would have the other two types of people in the known universe "by the balls".

One example of this is the Counter-Racist Action known as the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955. The bus system in Montgomery, Alabama, received most of its financial support from "black" people, and at the same time, promoted unjust policies that mistreated "non-white" people on the basis of skin color. The boycott was a planned action produced by the Council Of Federated Organizations, which was a coalition of groups who had unified to make an attempt to end that mistreatment.

The catalyst that prompted this boycott was not an emotional reaction initiated by an "ol' black lady, who was jus' too tired to move her lil ol' legs". The Racists had influenced my mind heavily, in the second major area of people activity known as Education to believe that Rosa Parks got upset on the spur of the moment and refused to comply with the "white" bus driver. I believed that the majority of these so-called "Civil Rights" actions were founded on emotion. But, I have learned that they were well-planned and calculating forms of resistance.

There were some situations that were a spur of the moment "emotional outburst" from a "non-white" person. It appears to me that one of them may have been the earlier "seat refusal" in Montgomery, Alabama by Claudette Colvin, which occurred nine months before the Rosa Park's situation. The Council Of Federated Organizations decided not to rally to support Ms. Colvin, because of political reasons that could have affected the outcome of its objective. I read that this decision was made because people would have been less sympathetic to the cause, because she was 15 years old, dark-skinned, unmarried, and pregnant. Wow! The standards of today have not changed much since then.

Most of the participants in the movement at that time took classes that gave them training in what is called direct action. They called such places, Freedom Schools

When those "black" people reacted on the thought that they could force the bus system to change its unjust policies, by not riding its buses, they used alternative forms of transportation. They had the whole bus system "by the balls", because it could no longer function efficiently without their financial support. This "by the balls" attitude eliminated that Racist Action.

Today, a lot of the "direct action" techniques that were used back then to resist Racist actions, are still used today, by huge numbers of "white" people to solve some of the other "problems" of the world. You know the kind.......Environmental, Animal Rights, Abortion, Same Sex Marriage, Homelessness, Obama-ism, etc.

Yes, I said Obama-ism. That's what all of this "tea party" stuff has been about. They are using "direct action" to get Racist Suspects elected and make decisions that more than likely will produce injustice. They call themselves the "Tea Party" in remembrance of the Boston Tea Party, a "direct action" launched against the "British Government",  which is known as the "United Kingdom" today. From my observation these modern "tea party goers", do not have the best interest of "non-white" people.

Let's start thinking about how we can get Racism (White Supremacy) "by the balls". Review the history of all of the Counter Racists (Malcolm, King, DuBois, Garvey, etc) who came before us. Of course they didn't use this term to describe themselves, but it is what they were doing.

Stay strong in the struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice !

Monday, September 27, 2010

Make it a Habit to Save Your Money

On page 64 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. it says:

"Make a habit of saving some part of all monies that regularly comes into your possession."

Reason / Explanation:

To save regularly helps to prevent waste, and helps a person to be better prepared for emergencies and for opportunities.

I agree with the above suggestion because I have been saving money on a regular basis. There have been plenty of emergencies that I have overcome and opportunities that I have met with the money that I have saved. A constructive way of doing this, is to take 10% of all monies that come into my regular possession and save it. I never missed that money either. No matter where the money came from I stored a piece of it away. If I got a $2,000.00 tax return, I'd put away $200.00. If I got a $100.00, I'd save $10.00 of it. If I found $10.00, I'd save $1.00 of it.

To figure out what 10% of your money is, it must be converted to decimal form (.10). Then you multiply your total money amount by that decimal form.

The formula for arriving at how much you should save is:

.10 (10%)
m = Your Money

$315.40 X .10 = $31.54

Pull that 10% out first and then use the rest to pay your bills. You will be amazed at how much you can save in a short amount of time. Another way to save money is to resist Racism (White Supremacy).

As a "non-white" person in a system of Racism (White Supremacy), you are subject to finding non-constructive ways to alleviate (temporarily) the stress from being victimized. There are Racists who are aware of this and they seek to profit from your misery by providing you with cigarettes, drugs, and alcohol. If you are in the habit of spending your money on these things regularly cutting back on them can help you save money.

Cigarettes are from $4.00 and $7.00 a pack around the so-called U.S.A.

You will have to spend at least $3.00 to get that buzz from getting your "drank on" everyday.

And you have to spend at least what? $20.00? on "some trees" (marijuana).

If you spend your money on these items on a per week basis, your wasting about $30.00 X 4 weeks (sometimes 5 weeks) which is $120.00 to $150.00 a month!

What can you do with that much money?

Save it!

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

BLACK S CAN’T BE RACIST by Andile Mngxitama

This was an interesting transcript that I found on the internet. It was listed in the "Articles regarding Racism (White Supremacy)" box on the bottom right side of this blog.

The following is a transcribed version of a talk given by Andile Mngxitama at Wits University on an essay he wrote, titled “Blacks can’t be Racist”. He gave the talk to a full house in August 2010.

The university is a great example of how you want to think about the continuation of racism or the white-supremacist project…if you look at how the university is organized. I was thinking Wits is the epitome of white supremacy and I know that Black thinking is outlawed at Wits, by and large. If you look at any of the courses that you do, check the readings that they give you and try to make a study of how many of them, most of the time will be African thinkers or writers….very few. Now, I thought I should introduce to you…you don’t have to agree with what I say but I hope you can do this. There are two critical thinkers in this country that you know the university will not talk about. The first one is Lewis Nkosi. Lewis Nkosi comes from a writing sort of background. Check his writings, check his attitude to knowledge, check his attitude to the Black condition….the Black question and I want to dedicate this talk today to him and to the late Professor Archie Mafeje. Archie Mafeje single-handedly….by 34 he was a full professor…if you study anthropology I know that they haven’t told you about him because he single-handedly destroyed the science of anthropology and showed it to be colonial studies…single-handedly. And he was not like me, he was not howling, he did very detailed scientific studies and in fact if you want to go to Archie Mafeje online you will find his debates with other white scholars in that field but I know that Wits is not going to tell you about that, the white professors are not going to tell you about Archie Mafeje. So I want to dedicate this talk to both Lewis Nkosi who is very ill right now, he is a very sick man and he’s here in South Africa and to Archie Mafeje who has passed on. I think if you are serious about thinking and change you have to understand these people. There are many more but I thought today I should tell you about these two.

Now today I want to talk about “Black s can’t be Racist”. I’m told by some people who were giving out pamphlets for this talk that some brothers and sisters said, “No, you can’t say we’re not racist, I am racist, I hate white people”. (Laughter) And I was thinking how do you get around that point because that is the most natural response that Black people should have against white racism? We should hate people that oppress us. We should hate a system that oppresses us. But you see, we’ve been messed up so much that we can’t even say it. But hatred is not going to take you very far, you see? So I was thinking that to deal with this problem you have to think about Malcolm X, because Malcolm X helps us to organize our thinking. You know the whole thing about the house negro and the field negro. You see, and this is what democracy has done, you have your field negro and your house negro is the guy who responds to whiteness. Back then on the plantation, the house negro was given leftover food, given the clothes of the master and he loved the master and he spoke like the master and in fact when the house of the master was on fire he wanted to save it and when the master was sick he prayed to the Lord and said, “God, please save us”. He never even said “save the master”, he said, “save us”. The house negroes, one of the problems [with them] is that, even when they could hear the agony and cries of the field negroes being beaten they still did not accept that the whole institution of slavery was based on violence. They loved the house of the master so much that they wanted to save it. The field negroes, on the other hand, just like those sisters and brothers who were saying they hate white people, when the master was sick, they prayed to their Black God that the master must die. When the house of the master was on fire, they prayed to their Black God that more wind must come and burn down the whole place. So those are field negroes. At the end of the day, whatever we say, we are going to come back to this question: Are we field negroes or are we house negroes? That is the bottom line. If you understand democracy and if you understand the place of Black people…it’s going to come back to that question. Now, I’m quickly going to show us how we were created as Black people, [in order] to helps us deal with the issue of racism.

"Black Racism"
New Frank Talk number 3, this red one, says, “Black s can’t be Racist”. Now, the context is this that in 2008 something called the Forum for Black Journalists, they invited the president of the ANC, Jacob Zuma into their forum to address them, in a closed meeting, it was not a press conference. White journalists decided to gatecrash this meeting and the Black journalists said, “You can’t do this, this is white arrogance”. And the white journalists went to the Human Rights Commission and complained that being excluded from that meeting is unconstitutional and also racist, so the Black journalists are racist by excluding white journalists. So we had hearings at the HRC and I made a submission, this reading is based on that. It surprised me a lot, that after 350 years of systematic oppression of Black people, by racism, which benefits white people, when Black people gather in their own meeting, white people can insist that they want to be part of that. And then, of course complain about that. By the way, after that whole process, the HRC came to the conclusion that in fact, it is indeed true, that our Constitution does not allow Black people to be amongst themselves without supervision from white people. (Laughter) It went further to say that the Forum for Black Journalists must amend its constitution to include white people, otherwise it must stop to exist. Those who study law amongst you, must know Moreane, Advocate Moreane is a senior council, he wrote the appeal, I thought it was watertight, I thought they would win the appeal, again, from reading our Constitution very closely, the HRC could not help but come to the same conclusion that as Black people we cannot meet amongst ourselves, we cannot fight racism as Black people. That worried me a lot. How is it possible that in a racist country, Black people cannot be allowed to organize on their Blackness? And I said we need to look at this racism question. And I’m arguing in the book that what we need is conceptual fidelity. In other words, a chair is not a table, to make sense, you have to name things and give them their properties. Racism is not xenophobia, even if they are both about discrimination. It is not patriarchy even if, in some ways, patriarchy is as bad as racism. Racism describes a process of Black people’s subjugation. If you don’t limit this definition then racism becomes everything and everyone can be a victim of racism and Black people, as a result, are unable to make claims for reparations for slavery, for colonialism, for apartheid and continuing discrimination of Black people. You have to understand that.

If racism is everything, if you say white people can become victims of racism, what you have done right there, is to wipe off the historical slate clean of the specialized, unique ways in which Black people have been oppressed over the ages. We alone, only we were enslaved in the manner that we were enslaved. Us alone, were colonized in the manner that we were colonized. Capitalism today and white civilization, if you like, are created out of these sort of oppressions that us as Black people, that us alone have suffered. This is the point I was trying to make. And this is the point we try to make in “Black s can’t be Racist”. Steve Biko helps us a lot here because he says that racism is defined as the subjugation of one group by another for the purpose of exploitation. Now, we Black people, we don’t have the intention of subjugating anyone. I don’t think when we talk about Black liberation we talk about oppressing anyone. And normally in Black wash we say that all we want is to share in the wealth of our country. And I can tell you about sharing in the wealth of the country; I hope you guys know who owns the wealth of our country right now. I hope you know that when you look at the JSE, that even with the BEE Black capitalists, who are part of the white supremacist project, we don’t own, 10% of the JSE. Sixteen years later, the ANC has made sure that only 6% of land has been distributed to Black people and it means that more than 80% of the land is still in white hands. The ANC has ensured, that in the same period, more than 1 million Black people have been evicted from farms, by White farmers. I’m saying the ANC because the responsibility of transforming this society, must rest with the majority party that can, if it wants to change even the Constitution by getting a bit of support from [for example] the PAC. It hasn’t. You see, this business of us suffering racism, does not mean that we should not take responsibility for the continuation of the oppression of Black people. We need to be clear: White people are just 10% [of the population], they are not a problem. Think about it. White people are not a problem and we should not waste too much time with them. (Laughter) The problem is this, and it’s an unfortunate problem: the day Black people want to change this society to get the wealth, the gold, the platinum, the land, the people we are going to confront is the African National Congress as government. If you have not figured that out then you are in trouble.

Let me go back now to explain, in my view, the three related processes that create the Black person out of this white experience. You have to think of the Black as a creation of whiteness out of a very violent process. In South Africa it is three related dispossessions. The first dispossession is land dispossession, they dispossessed us of our land, it was a very violent process. The second dispossession is labour dispossession. They turned us into workers, servants. When they discovered gold and diamonds in the mid-1800s, they took land even when they did not need it. But because they wanted us to come and work…to work on their mines…because if we still have access to land then we don’t want to come work for the white man. So they come to your village and take your land and force you to come and work for them. And Marxists tell us that it’s a good thing to be a worker. Cecil John Rhodes said it back then, he said, we must tell these [Black ] people, we must make sure that they’re just going to become workers. Now people fight to become workers. You have to think about that. And every year they strike for about 10%, which is about R150. (Laughter) The third dispossession process is what I call the dispossession of the African being. The destruction of our Africanness was led by two processes: The one is their education, their white education and secondly their white God. Christinisation and education. When they give you their education and their God, when they are done with you, you can’t remember who you are. (Laughter) And we must also say this, that it was not a peaceful process. Those people who read history, for example, will know the story of Tiyo Soga’s father…how he surrendered his sons to white education. It was a painful process but he knew that if he did not surrender his sons to white education, then they would be destroyed. Their god was a very very violent god. If you did not surrender to their god of commerce, they would destroy your family and your communities. We must understand that. So when these three processes were concluded, we were sitting as we are now with a complex of inferiority and white people have a complex of superiority. But these things find expression in materiality. We know that Black people need to find jobs in order to live. When you finish at this university you are going to work for big companies owned by white people. Normally I say that if you think about the educational process of colonialism the first people they educated were the Xhosas, I call them the first coconuts. Nelson Mandela’s mannerisms and Thabo Mbeki’s mannerisms are part of that [colonial education]. They dress and speak like English gentlemen. They are Xhosa English gentlemen. And you know, in some ways, I really think they believe that they are. (Laughter) Chinweizu, the Nigerian scholar makes the point that, colonial education is almost like giving mice the education of cats. A mouse without an orientation and education of the cat, when it sees a cat it naturally runs away. That’s the natural response. But if you take a mouse and you bring it to Wits and give it a lot of education and it assimilates and it believes itself to be a cat. When it sees a cat, it sees a friend. (Laughter) And now the problem is that the friend which is the cat…sometimes, it is hungry (Laughter). This is a problem.

Let’s just go back then. I’ve just spoken about the creation of the Black out of this relationship of violence in our encounter with whiteness. I have not spoken about whiteness. I can simply say this: the benefits that accrue to whiteness, whether they are economic or social or political have become naturalised. Out of that whole violent process of marginalizing us Black people, marking us out in terms of our skin colour, for the sort of oppressions I have just mentioned, [white people] have accrued all these privileges. And in our thinking, in our thought processes, when you see a Black you can almost put together all those characteristics of Black ness – we are all these things which are not nice. When you see a white person, you don’t even have to think about it. Maybe I should just go back a bit, when I came here in February, there was a place…I think they called it the Accommodations Office. There were a lot of Black students there. Some students at Wits travel by train to come to school. A [Black ] student here fainted from lack of food. And do you know what the system does, what the education of the cat does to us? We are shameful. We take responsibility as if it’s our fault. So we are beginning to police the system ourselves. Instead of saying wait, “we are entitled to be at university to be well fed, to be well housed, because this is our country”. You don’t organize on that basis, you feel individually ashamed. But that is part of the ideological process.

Now, I feel we must not waste too much time on whiteness but whites will get the privileges you will never get. Even the white revolutionary will get the privileges you will never get. Even when Joe Slovo died…he’s buried right now in Soweto, you must go to his grave and you will see that he is the only person buried there identified by name amongst a lot of Black people who are sleeping there. I’m saying to you that even if a white person dies for you, you will be forgotten, they will not be forgotten. (Laughter) And I’m not saying you should not have white friends. It’s okay to have white friends and girlfriends and that sort of thing. But I’m saying it’s a lie to say that…you see at Wits they teach bad Sociology these days. They say race is a social construct therefore race has got no scientific basis. What is not socially constructed? Even God is socially constructed. Everything we know is socially constructed. Class and gender are also socially constructed. Why is it that race is socially constructed but has got no scientific basis? We as Black people we know that if you are aware and open your eyes, you can feel it. You know it. You know that you are Black when you walk into a room full of white people… you know it. (Laughter).

I’m going to round off by going back to a difficulty. Once you have established, and I think in some ways we have established the fact that we need to defend the discourse that says that, Black s can’t be racist. If you don’t do that then you are not giving yourself a chance to make claims to this society about the reparations that are due to us as Black people. Then nguvula zibuqe ngesiXhosa, it’s like open season for everyone (as the Xhosa would say). And what it means is that they are going to say that YOU are racist. The victim is going to be the perpetrator. And the best way to shut down a Black person who talks about racism is to say, “You are racist”. But you see, for Black people the trauma of accepting that we are victims of racism, is serious. It is better not to accept it. It is better to pretend around that. It is better to think that we are all equal. Despite the fact that your people live in squatter camps, your people live in RDP houses. And that brings me to the ANC. You have to ask yourself the question that: how did the ANC think that it’s okay to build an RDP house for Black people; a house which is worse that the house built by white people for Black people? How do you understand this? How do you understand this process? Now, I’m arguing, in conclusion that, the managers of white supremacy are Black people. In the 21st Century, whiteness needs a bit of melanin. A little bit of melanin to reproduce itself. So in South Africa in 1994 you have Nelson Mandela. In the United States of America today you have Obama, right? Has the Obama’s presidency changed the condition of Black people who remain in the death rows? If you go to the death rows of America, the people being killed are Black people.If you go to the jails of America, the majority of people there are Black people. Obama has not touched that system. He has given it respectability. George Bush was good because he was clear, and he was also stupid about it: “We are going to bomb the world in their interests of white capital”. Obama is bombing the world with a smile. Allowing our people to be killed with a smile. Now in South Africa it’s the same thing; the ANC are the managers of the white supremacist system and we vote for them year in and year out. I’m going to be cruel and say, in the same way, if you look at Wits, the Vice Chancellor is a Black man, one of us. However, if you look at the culture and the interests of this institution, it remains white. The fact that he is sitting at the top of this institution, does not change the truth of Wits. (Applause) It is true also that, it is not just Wits. UCT was given to Mamphele Ramphela to run for a few years, she made sure that the institution did not change….she could not change it, in fact. This is the important thing. They would not allow her to change it. Before Professor Nongxa (the current Wits Vice Chancellor), there was another Black professor, Makgoba, who is now a professor at the university of Kwa-Zulu natal. I was on campus at the time. Makgoba arrived here with very very strange ideas of wanting to Africanise Wits. Very very quickly that man was out of this university (Laughter). One of the most celebrated, and I don’t always agree with Mahmood Mamdani, but one of the celebrated social scientists who come from the African continent, contemporarily, is Mahmood Mamdani from Uganda. He went to UCT because he was becoming a celebrity intellectual, an academician, if you like, and when he arrived there he wanted to change the curriculum and to Africanise it. You can find this Mamdani controversy online, I think, and you can see what they did to him. The man did not stay there for two years, he had to be kicked out because he started saying, “You know, there are African scholars and thinkers that we can prescribe to these students”.

So I’m saying you have to think very hard about how white supremacy reproduces itself. In fact, to conclude that part of my talk, I must just say that it’s not possible to have Obama as a Black president if you don’t have two other Black people before him – and that is Condolezza Rice and Collin Powel. It is important that when Collin Powel and Condolezza Rice were appointed by the Republicans, the most conservative but you see, they could see that these [Black ] people could serve the system…and very well. And so, Obama must be given a chance. More so because he is such a smart man, and he speaks so well and apparently he is handsome too. (Laughter)

I think I must stop there and maybe end by saying that the constitutional dispensation we have in South Africa is anti-Black itself and de Klerk…F.W. de Klerk, when he recalled…20 years after releasing Mandela, he said…and it’s available online as well…he said, “actually when we negotiated with the ANC, to tell you the truth, we won in those negotiations”. He said it. He said it with arrogance. He said it, I think earlier this year when 20 years of Mandela’s release was being celebrated. And then somebody asked him how he could say that and he said, “You see, what we have done is…we knew that there was going to be a majority in parliament, we made sure that they couldn’t make just ANY law that they wanted to make. So we guaranteed this by making a Constitutional court, which is informed by constitutional principles, which will make sure that these guys, even when they are in parliament and they make laws, those laws must become part of a constitutional review.” For instance, if the ANC tomorrow wanted to say that let’s have a law that will return the land to Black people without paying compensation, the constitutional court would strike that down as unconstitutional. You see? But I must also say that the ANC is not interested in testing even that (Laughter) because it has not tried to do that. It has not made any radical laws to return our land, to return our mineral resources and I would be very worried to give my mineral resources to the ANC under the current regime. Imagine what they will do when they can get access to these minerals. I mean, look at what they have done with Eskom, look at what they’ve done with everything else that we have given them to manage. All I’m saying is that even if they tried, the constitutional dispensation that they negotiated for and have accepted and are not testing, is anti-Black and let me stop there and let’s have a conversation amongst ourselves. (Applause)

At this point, questions were taken from the audience by the facilitator.

Question 1:
You talk about Black s not being racist, but we can also be…what is it…tribalistic? How does that venture into [the whole idea that] Black s can’t be racist because if I’m racist to my fellow brother, eventually it means that I can be racist towards white people.

Question 2:
I heard you speaking on SAfm, I wanted to know…what do you think we should do with the continued threat of organisations like AgriSA that…{inaudible} and what do you think about the entitlement amongst some of us who are Black .

Question 3:
I’m interested in the fact that…do they (the ANC) have any other option to make the Constitution other than to incorporate the National Party coz you say the constitution is written to protect white interests, you say it’s anti-Black . Did we have any other option or were we not going to go into some kind of civil war, if we did not go according to the route that we used, during the time that the [constitution was formulated].

Question 4:
I just want to engage you on the definition of racism…trying to understand the concept of conceptual fidelity. If racism is the subjugation of one group by another, why do we focus on one form of subjugation? Can’t the subjugation be attitudinal? If I have an attitude but lack the power to subjugate, why can’t I qualify as a racist? The only thing I seem to lack is the power, but if I had power then I would subjugate them. So I think conceptually that is something unhygienic. (Audience applauds)

Andile Mngxitama:
You see, the first brother spoke about tribalism. For me that’s what it is. The sort of intra-Black difficulties…that’s tribalism. We know what it is. It’s not racism. Even if it is a form of discrimination. You will not call tribalism patriarchy because that describes another form of [oppression]. You will not call anti-Semitism xenophobia. It seems to me a very straightforward question. Otherwise we don’t know what we’re talking about. Then…the black board is racist. It comes back to the issue of attitudes. I can have an attitude of…I don’t like tall people. So what? I see tall people and I don’t like them, but so what? But racism has material consequences. It comes back to your question about attitudes. It’s not about, “I don’t like weaves or I don’t like dreadlocks”. So what? Racism makes sure that there is Alexandra and there is Sandton. And in Alexandra there are Black people and in Sandton there are White people. The creation of Sandton is directly linked to the creation of Alexandra. Do you understand that logic? (Andile is addressing the fourth questioner directly).

Questioner: Shakes his head.

Andile Mngxitama: No? I can’t help you. I can’t help you. White wealth is created out of the subjugation of Black people, historically. You must tell me if I’m wrong there…that there were not laws, systematic laws that made sure that Black people and White people benefited. You must tell me that, “No, this is not true, historically this is not the trajectory we have followed”. It seems to me that this is true so of course to lack attitude and lack power…my brother, if you lack the power to do this stuff that you imagine then we must stop the debate right there. I have the desire to kill you but I do not have the power to kill you. So what? You’re fine…you continue with your life and I continue with my desire to kill you which has no material benefits. (Applause) And I do think that Black people have desires to kill white people (Laughter) But you see, when we talk about xenophobia, we killed those people. And I mean, I don’t call it xenophobia, it is afrophobia. Because xenophobia means that you’re killing foreigners. White people are visitors, investors, tourists and so on. (Laughter) So even if we wanted to [kill white people] we don’t have the power. In this essay (Black s can’t be Racist), there is a very interesting passage where James Baldwin talks to this white woman….she was in Guinea at the time, and she says, “there were 200 wild wild Black men and I was the only white woman sometimes in that plantation but they knew that if they touched me, maybe 20 or more of them would be killed”. She says, “It was only white supremacy that ensured that I could control these very violent [Black ] fighters as a white woman…as a lone white woman in the jungle”. If you don’t believe me then you must ask Mugabe what white people and white supremacy can do to you if you touch them. You can ask him. Or you can ask another brother…who’s that brother who killed his white wife in the US? (Audience responds: OJ Simpson). Do you know where OJ Simpson is now? That man is in jail, hey? Serving 30 years or so for what? For taking his own stuff which was taken by some people and he went to take it back. They took him and they remembered…by the way, we must still sort this man out. Don’t play around with White people, my friend. (Laughter)

The other brother asked about the threat of white farmers and you know, this one white farmer cried on radio. She said, “These people, these [Black ] farm workers…we love them, how can you say that there are human rights abuses against them”? And she cried…on radio. And they say if we give farm workers any more rights, [White farmers] are going to go away and we’re going to die coz there are going to be food security problems so we must leave the situation as is and I don’t want to tell you what’s going on in farms. My brother, the point is a simple one: we must make a decision about whether we want to continue in this slavery path or we want to take our country back and maybe suffer some consequences but be like Zimbabwe. Give them another five years, and you’ll see that country is going to…Let me tell you right now, South Africa is 350 years behind Zimbabwe. You will never touch the Zimbabweans on their capacity to take back their land, their economy and being an independent country. You will not. (Applause) You can check online a study done by Professor Ben Cousin on Masvingo, where people have taken land. Check it, it’s there online. And I had stopped talking to Ben Cousin because he hated the Zimbabwean land reform process and I as supporting it at the time. He went there for three years to study, he came back and he said, he is shocked by the results. Those people who did occupy land live slightly better than those who didn’t. That’s number one. But even more, those White people who stayed behind…there are some people White people who stayed behind…their relationship with Black people in Zimbabwe has dramatically improved. You see? If you take away the power to be racist, White people become nice people. (Laughter)
Then the question about whether in 1994, if we did not negotiate our rights away, was there another possibility that we had. You see, even if I accept that there was no other option, we have already had three [general] elections. You have the ANC with a two-thirds majority with the possibility of changing those conditions. There is no threat of a civil war, right now. The ANC controls the army, it controls…and I’m sure amongst us there are some people from intelligence. (Laughter) The question is: Soyika ntoni? What are we so scared of? What stops us from changing our country? I don’t think there’s any particular reason.

Question 5: I just wanted to ask: what’s your point? You know, people are always complaining, but what are you going to do about it? At this point in time, what constructive things can you do about it coz there’s no point in saying that we’re not supposed to be at varsity coz that’s what the white man wanted us to do. What do you want?

Question 6: In terms of land distribution, how do you trace the land? Do you trace it from say, the 1990s or the 1980s?

Andile Mngxitama: The sister says that we must stop complaining. I accept that point, that we must stop complaining but if we accept that this is a democratic plantation, if we accept that democracy does not serve us, I don’t know whether we can legitimately claim that people must stop complaining. What we CAN say is that we need to say the next thing, which is organizing. But you see, it is also true that, we have a problem. Most of us Black people do not believe that we own this country. And so, first we need to work on our minds and this is part of that of process of working our minds. And I know that I am pushing the boundaries because I want you to be uncomfortable and start thinking about these questions because we don’t think about these questions. We don’t think about these questions. You know, I always make this example about trains. You must see, our people are packed in those trains like sardines, hanging outside the trains and we have accepted it as normal. That’s what we call institutional violence. The fact that people go to bed without food in a country that exports most of its food, is something that should not be tolerated. But we’re tolerating it, right? So all I’m saying is that we need to complain and we are very open to come to your residence or anywhere else to continue this discussion because there’s a lot of discussion we need to have amongst ourselves.

I’m not saying we should not be at university…I was at university myself, and from time to time I try to register to do my PhD. The point is that: are you aware that you are getting the kind of education that wants to make you into a cat? You can take some of this education and use it to serve the Black cause. (Applause) I think we can turn these things around. The problem is when we accept them as natural, as a natural progression and then you stop thinking about the Black larger agenda.

The question about how we trace our land. The thing is I don’t care if you are from Rwanda or whether I arrived here in the 2nd Century, it doesn’t matter. The point is that this is an African continent. And the argument is a simple one, even the white people who are here; we are not saying they must go away. We are simply saying, can’t we just share, equally…all of us? This is the only thing we are saying. But these other guys don’t want to share. This is the problem. (Laughter) They don’t want to share the thing they took from us. That’s what makes things even worse. All we want is an equal share of the wealth, the land and all other profits. In fact, in Black wash we say that we want Black socialism and it’s different from these people talking about scientific socialism and workers. Workers will be liberated by us. Workers only want a salary, they will not go very far. We say Black socialism…Black socialism says that everyone of us sitting here should be a shareholder in the company that is called South Africa. All the wealth that is in this country…me and you at the end of the financial year should be able to say, it’s 10% that we are going to get of the trillions that (South Africa) is going to make. Some they’ll take to education, health, roads and then they will say okay, we will declare dividends. So me and you will have R2mil in our pockets. Why must Tokyo Sexwale and the Oppenheimers take all the billions and me and you not benefit from gold and the diamonds of this country? That is what we call Black socialism.

Andile Mngxitama is the publisher of New Frank Talk of which Black s can’t be Racist, is one of many volumes. To order copies of New Frank Talk send an email to:
You can also book Andile for a talk in your community, university etc. Send an email to the address above.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Many Victims of Racism Get Deceived in MLM "Pyramid" Schemes

I myself have been victimized  and a witness to many other Victims of Racism (non-white people) being victimized by Multilevel Marketing (M.L.M.) Schemes. I suspect that most M.L.M.'s are created these days by Racists who take advantage of the lack of business knowledge and the fear of poverty that huge numbers of Victims of Racism have, by promising us outrageous profits.

Groups like "Quickstar (Amway)", "Pre-paid Legal","Primemerica", "Ameriplan", "Access", etc. Such groups may have a real service or product to offer, but the deception is in getting you to be a "business owner" and build your "bottom line". Most of these organizations make millions of of their "business owners", from the seminars, tapes, or CD's, web pages, and books that teach you "how to be a business owner" for your "investment" dollars.

When these schemes first start out they probably enlist a few other Racist suspects to be at the top and then, go out and get huge numbers of "non-white" people to join in to keep the "investments" flowing. I've witnessed "non-white" people miss out on paying their rent to go on a trip to Las Vegas to attend a two day seminar and come back with books and tapes produced by the MLM, with the promise that if they stay persistent with increasing their "bottom-line", that one day they too will be millionaires.

I think that MLM schemes originally started out as a way for "white" people to take advantage of other "white" people, (not that they were doing "non-white" people a favor), more like they just weren't thinking about us. But what generally happens is that under the system of Racism (White Supremacy), "white" people collectively generally have access to and learn more constructive information about things before we do. I suspect that these days so many "white" people know that most MLM's are scams that, its hard for the founders of such schemes to gain any income from selling these ideas to other "white" people, so these days, they focus on "non-white" people.

Here is some constructive information to follow when you are propositioned to become a "business owner" for one of these schemes:

Multilevel or “network” marketing plans are ways to sell goods or services through distributors. Typically, these plans promise that if you sign up as a distributor, you’ll get commissions not only from the sales you make, but also from the sales of the people you recruit to become distributors. These recruits sometimes are called your “downline.”

Not all multilevel marketing plans are legitimate. Some are pyramid schemes. It’s best not to get involved in plans where the money you make is based primarily on the number of distributors you recruit and your sales to them, rather than on your sales to people outside the plan who intend to use the products.

Joining a pyramid is risky because the vast majority of participants lose money to pay for the rewards of a few people at the top.

How can you tell the difference between a bona fide multilevel marketing plan and a pyramid scheme? According to the Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, it takes research, some business sense and a healthy share of skepticism.
Evaluating a Plan

What’s involved in doing research? Asking your sponsor and other distributors tough questions, and digging for details. Don’t consider it nosy or intrusive: you are on a mission to check out a potential opportunity that will require your money and your time.

1. Find — and study — the company’s track record. Look for newspaper or magazine articles about the company. Do an internet search. Look through several pages of search results to get a good idea of the information available about the company.

* How long has the company been in business? Does it have a positive reputation for customer satisfaction?
* What can you find out about the product and the service?
* What’s the buzz about the company and the product on blogs and websites?
* Has anyone sued the company for deceptive business practices? Checking with your local Better Business Bureau, Chamber of Commerce and state Attorney General for complaints about any company you’re considering investing in is a prudent thing to do. But remember that a lack of complaints doesn’t guarantee a company’s legitimacy.

2. Learn about the product. What will you be selling? Are similar products on the market? Is the product priced competitively? Is it safe? Can your sponsor — the distributor who is recruiting you — support claims about the product’s performance?

3. Ask questions. Ask your sponsor for the terms and conditions of the plan: the compensation structure, your potential expenses, support for claims about how much money you can make and the name and contact information of someone at the company who has details about the terms and conditions and can tell you how much the average distributor makes before and after expenses. Get this information in writing. Avoid any plan where the reward for recruiting new distributors is more than it is for selling products to the public. That’s a time tested tip-off to a pyramid scheme.

Multilevel marketing plans usually base at least part of your monthly income and bonuses on the sales of the distributors you recruit. Keep in mind that if you solicit new distributors, you are responsible for the claims you make about how much money they can earn. Be honest, and avoid making unrealistic promises. If the promises fall through, you could be held liable, even if you are simply repeating claims you read in a company brochure or advertising flyer, or heard from another distributor.

If you don’t understand something, ask for more information until it is absolutely clear to you. Your sponsor and other distributors should be willing to answer your questions. Be skeptical and carefully evaluate the information you get. Remember that your sponsor and other distributors above you likely will make money if you join the program. So take your time, and don’t yield to pressure to join.

4. Understand any restrictions. Get the company’s refund policy in writing. Make sure it includes the process for returns as well as restrictions on — or penalties for — returning unused products if you choose to leave the plan. It may seem like you’re minimizing your risk if you can return products for a reimbursement, but policies vary on getting full refunds — and how long it could take. Many plans require you to buy training or marketing materials or pay for seminars if you want to get product discounts or create your own network of distributors. Find out how much time and money other distributors spent on training, marketing materials and seminars when they joined the plan, and whether the plan requires you to participate in periodic training. What happens if you opt out of the training?

5. Talk to other distributors. Ask your sponsor for the names and contact information for distributors at all levels of the plan. Get in touch with them to ask the same questions you asked your sponsor. In most plans, “upline” distributors stand to benefit when you buy into the system, so they should be willing to answer your questions with specifics. If you get vague answers or guesses, ask follow-up questions until you hear — and understand — the information you need to make your decision. Be aware that there may be shills — “decoy” references paid by the company or distributor to pretend they had success earning money through the plan.

6. Consider using a friend or adviser as a neutral sounding board or for a gut check. You may want to consult with an accountant, a lawyer or another person you trust who is not affiliated with the plan to review the terms of compensation, determine whether the plan can back up any claims about the amount of money you can make, and analyze the information you’ve gathered and the answers to your questions.

7. Take your time. Don’t pay or sign any contracts in an “opportunity meeting.” Take your time to think over your decision. Your investment requires real money, so talk to the distributors in settings that make you comfortable and when there’s the opportunity to take your time.

8. Think about whether this plan suits your talents and goals. Ask yourself whether you would enjoy selling products to the public. Find out how many hours a week your sponsor and other distributors spent on the business when they joined the plan and how much time they spend now. Remember that no matter how good a product and how solid a multilevel marketing plan may be, you’ll need to invest sweat equity and money for your investment to pay off. Consider the other demands of the business — for example, training, recruiting new distributors, managing paperwork, inventory and shipping — and factor how much time it could take to achieve the amount of money you anticipate.

Asking Questions

Here are some important questions to ask your sponsor and distributors at different levels of the organization. Their responses can help you detect false claims about the amount of money you may make and whether the business is a pyramid scheme.

1. What are your annual sales of the product? How much product did you sell to distributors? What percentage of your sales were made to distributors?

One sign of a pyramid scheme is if distributors sell more product to other distributors than they do to the public.

2. What were your expenses last year, including money you spent on training and purchasing products? How much money did you make last year — that is, your income and bonuses minus your expenses? How much time did you spend last year on the business? How long have you been in the business? How many people are in your downline?

It’s important to get a complete picture of how the plan works: not just how much money distributors make, but also how much time and money they spend on the plan, how long it takes to make money and how big a downline is needed to make money.

3. What percentage of the money you made — income and bonuses minus your expenses — came from recruiting other distributors and selling them inventory or other items to get started?

Another sign of a pyramid scheme is if the money you make depends more on recruiting — getting new distributors to pay for the right to participate in the plan — than on sales to the public.

When you find yourself being mistreated directly or indirectly by the Racists (White Supremacists), I think that its correct to get other "white" people involved in helping you to fight your battles.

The FTC works to prevent fraudulent, deceptive and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop and avoid them. To file a complaint or get free information on consumer issues, visit or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. Watch a new video, How to File a Complaint, at to learn more. The FTC enters consumer complaints into the Consumer Sentinel Network, a secure online database and investigative tool used by hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.