Counter Racism Now! Campaigns

Saturday, July 24, 2010

I'm Tired of Hearing :"Thousands of years ago our ancestor's ruled this planet"

There are many "non-white" and "white" people today, who are greatly entertained, when they hear a "non-white" person talking about how the "Black man is God", and the "White man is the Devil".

"Thousands of years ago our ancestor's ruled this planet."

"Black people are the original people of the planet and all knowledge came from us."

"We built the pyramids and the 'white' man still doesn't know how they were built."

"We were Kings and Queens and when they were walking on all fours and living in caves!"

"Jesus was Black!"

"All of the prophets in the Bible were Black!"

"Black people invented the light bulb."

These words boost the ego and get one very excited about having dark skin. All of those words sound good and some of them according to the evidence are true. But, we are still being DOMINATED and SUBJUGATED under a system that has been here since the 16th century (at the least).

What can "non-white" people do to stop being mistreated on the basis of color TODAY?

Right now, if a person came here from another planet, not knowing anything about "white people being savages when we created civilization", or that "we built the pyramids", or that "we used to rule this planet". Would that person believe (based on their observation of the current situation) that "non-white" people are here to serve "white" people?

The video below explains it best.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

For Anyone Who Questions My Credentials

For anyone who questions my credentials, here is the doctorate degree that I earned for my 42 years of being a long time Victim of and Servant to Racism (White Supremacy).

Saturday, July 17, 2010

The Concept of "Race"

The Oxford American Dictionary states that "Race" means " of the great divisions of mankind with certain physical chacteristics in common (such as color of skin and hair, shape of eyes and nose). 2. a number of people related by common descent" there's more, but I don't need it for what I am stating.

O.k. I believe that the concept of "race" is a social construct. I think that it's a word invented by the Racists, in order to to help promote Race-ism. Now, I do not have any proof of the Racists actually creating the word, but if one would study ancient (babylon, mesopitamia, egypt, etc.) history, one would find no evidence of people classifying themselves as "races". These days racism has been confused with prejudice and discrimination, also name calling. People have been called racist because they don't like someone's religion, or because they don't like a so-called homosexual. This isn't racism. It could be discrimination. It might be prejudice, but, it's not racism. Racism is strictly based on the color of a persons skin.

I suspect that it wasn't until early "European" world exploration, that the concept of "race" came about. I say this because I've seen evidence that it was during this same time that Racists began to establish the system of white supremacy.

It's as though "Race" is like a type of class that we all use to determine how we treat one another. Under the system of white supremacy "white" is the top class, "black" is the bottom class, and "brown", "red" and "yellow" are in the middle somewhere. In reality people aren't "white", "black", "red" or "yellow". They are either pale or many shades of brown.
These five color "race" classifications were developed by this guy to your top left corner, "Johann Friedrich Blumenbach came up with the five color distribution of human races: White, Black, Yellow, Red, and Brown."
I suspect that this theory ( that's right. THEORY) that we are divided up into 3 species of Negroid, Mongaloid, and Caucasiod or Caucasian, came from him also. It's interesting that after he saw an attarctive non-white female, he changed his whole theory, but that never seemed to catch on like his earlier one. Hmmm... I wonder why?
THEORY-a set of ideas formulated to explain something. A person is supposed to back their theories up with facts and many don't. Some people will change the facts to back their theories. That is deception- a characteristic of a racist.

The whole planet was overun by the Racists during the 13th and 14th centuries. They were the smartest and most powerful "white" people amongst "white" people. The Racists from England, Spain, France, Portugal, The Netherlands, and a few others, openly dominated this world for centuries. They dominated all other areas in this world where the people looked different from them. During that period they (not any of the racists that exist today, of course.) instilled in our ancestors and their (the racist's) own descendents, through the area of education, this concept of "race"or what I call a class based on skin color. As it states here : "The first known racial classification system was created in the 17th century when a French doctor named Francois Bernier divided up humanity based on facial appearance and body type."
All non-white populated areas were under so-called European control during the 17th century. So we had no one to refute what was said. Non-white people during this time in most cases were forbidden to read and write. They also depended on everything that the racists told them at this time.

If you really think about it, there is no reason for dividing people up into groups unless you are classifying them for some purpose. What is the purpose of us being different "races"? We still follow the rules for classifying, but the purpose of the classifying hasn't been passed along with the rules. Attempting to fit people into "races" only serves one purpose. To judge them based on the color of their skin. states"These ideas originated in the fifteenth century when the ability to support such ideas using sound scientific methods was not possible. Now, scientists from many disciplines (e.g., genetics, anthropology, sociology, biology) agree that there are no distinct human races as was previously claimed."
Take a look at what this PBS link says on "race". It will probably explain it a lot better than I can. At least I tried.

The following video was added on 11/2/12:


Friday, July 09, 2010

Learn Something About Everything

I learned something new about Google in relation to collecting information. It will be up to you to determine if it is constructive or not. If you go to the Google start page. Before you start your search take a look at the links at the top of the start page.

"Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Mail more

You've probably exhausted the "Web", tabs looking for websites like, the, the C.O.W.S. Radio show, and any of the other sources of  Counter Racist Information that are popping up on the Web. You may have used the "Images" tab attempting to find Racist Propaganda to point out how us Victims of Racism are being indoctrinated into cooperating with Racism (White Supremacy), you may even use the "Video" tab, searching for "Another lesson in Counter Racism Science". You've probably gotten plenty of use out of the "Maps" tab to get directions. And the "News" tab? well I just don't know if you are using this one at all, unless you are searching for the most current Racist action that the media CHOOSES to make us aware of. But, I can tell you if you do use it, you will get many sources of information on whatever current story you are looking for, Google even allows you to personalize it so that the page only shows you the type of stories your are interested in. Surely, you've used the "Shopping" tab to collect the latest items to show off what the Racists have allowed you to have, or to buy the tools to be used for a constructive purpose. You probably get a lot of use out of the "Mail" tab for............whatever.

But what about the "More" tab? Have you ever clicked on the "More" tab? There is whole new learning experience behind the "More" tab. There is even an "Even More" tab. You've got to check this stuff out.

Anyway, back to the "More" tab for now. If you click on the "Books" tab that shows up after you hit the "More" tab, the information that you have access to will blow your mind. I've been online for the past two days and nights reading magazines dated back to the 40's. Very interesting pieces of information on different subjects. I found these gems of information:

in a Sept 1974 issue of Ebony: The "Conspiracy" to Make Black Males Inferior by Dr.Francis Cress-Welsing

in a June 1979 issue of Ebony The Battle Between the Sexes: Is It Manufactured Or Real

There are plenty more sources of information that are listed. I found a 1948 issue of Life magazine. Not that the issue was constructive, I am just demonstrating how far back it went.


Replace White Supremacy With Justice.

Sunday, July 04, 2010

My Experiences with "White" females Part Two

The Blond Bombshell

I can still remember my last encounter with a "white" woman. I was working as an Extra on a T.V. commercial in San Francisco. All of the other Extras were aspiring actors. Mostly "white" people and some sprinkles of "non-white" people. Everyone was friendly. It was like we were all at an amusement park or a night club, minus the music and the booze. Laughing, joking, talking, flirting, dancing, performing, with each other for about 28 days of filming. It felt like a family reunion, in fact most of the Extras that were there, were regulars that saw each other, every time there was a movie or commercial filmed in the bay area. I was one of the new ones and so was the "white" woman whom I had a sexual attraction to. There were many females both "white" and "non-white" working on this project, who were attractive (they all looked like models, for Victoria Secret or something). When I say "attractive" I mean any person that people classified as "white" and "non-white" would both want to have sexual intercourse or sexual play with. I was looking to be with anyone of them that appeared to be attracted to me. I was three years out of an attempted marriage, and taking care (with help from others) of my one female offspring. It had also been a year since I had any affection or sexual contact.

Based on many years experience of being rejected by "white" woman, I had learned that for me, if anything was going to lead to sexual intercourse (let me interject that I've never reserved myself exclusively for "white" women ) with one, it had to be them that initiated it.

Anyway, this particular "white" woman was not more or less attractive than any of the other fine females, that were there. She just was. She had long blond hair, blue eyes, and what appeared to be tanned skin. She didn't need any face make up to help with her attractiveness. Most of the females there didn't. She was what I have heard "white" men refer to as a "Blond Bomb Shell".

In the beginning of the project, I met, Patrick. Patrick told me that he did not like to say that he was "white", but would rather say that he was "Irish". He talked (though, I had learned about this already) to me about how the "Irish" are "non-white" people, in the "UK", but that when they come to the "United States", they are treated as though they are "white" people. If I had been codified back then, I would have had a bucket load of questions to ask him.

Okay okay to the point. Me, Pat, and a couple of the other guys, that were "street minded" so to speak, all started hanging out together everyday. We exchanged stories about fights, being in gangs, and small crimes that we committed and how we had a major event that made us change our ways. For me it was getting stabbed, but, that's another story. Anyway, the "white" woman, liked to hear our stories, and started hanging out with us too. By the 20th day, the crew had dwindled down to me, Pat, and her. Someone started referring to us as the Mod Squad. Letting us know about her "Irish" ancestry and because they were (in my mind at the time of the same "race") I assumed that she wanted to be with Pat, until one night she invited me (not Pat) to have drinks with her and some of the "white" men that worked on the project, at a brew house. While we're all sitting together, the "white" men started to compete for her attention with their stories.

I sat quietly beside her and listened to all of them talk. The beer she's drinking has a very interesting appearance, that I had never seen in a beer before. In the middle of all of their talking I say "What kind of beer is that?"

She turns to me and says  "Honey, it's called Hefenweisen, here drink some."

With raised eye brows and a scrunched fore head, I'm thinking "wait a minute, did she just call me honey?"

Within a half a second of me realizing that she called me Honey, in front of these "white" men, her beer is in front of my lips. With all eyes on me, I take a sip. At that moment all of the "white" men started making up excuses for why they had to leave and left. I remember one of them saying "Well, that did it for me, I'm calling it a night."

By this point in my existence, I had gotten so many mixed signals from my dealings with females (especially "white" women), that I couldn't tell if what had just transpired was because she really was attracted to me, or a deceptive ploy on her part to show the "white" men sitting with us that she wasn't interested in any of them.

After, they all left, she tells me that she resides in Santa Cruz and is house sitting at a house in San Francisco, with a pool and a hot tub. She says that she does not want to be alone, and wants me to keep her company, promising me that we will have a lot of fun. I thanked her for the invite, but declined, because I had to get back to Oakland, in order to pick up my "daughter". She gave me a ride to the B.A.R.T. (the Bay Area's commuter train) station. I remember her begging me to go with her. There were a lot of emotions that I felt that night. I could not think logically about what was going on at all. The system had trained me to take chances (the phrase "Just do it" comes to my mind), I had learned by this point in my existence, that if I can't think clearly about something, I had better not act on it. There were too many unknowns involved. But, I couldn't help but, wonder ( before the code) what it would have been like, if I had excepted the offer. I know now that it would have only increased my confusion and thus delayed me from focusing on eliminating the system of Racism (White Supremacy).
Update 1/10/13- I realized today that I also had a deep fear that she might accuse me of rape or something. It didn't reveal itself all of the time (because, I have had sexual intercourse with "White" women), but, I know that this fear was put in me as a child by my father-less, because of Racist Actions against Emmett Till, Willie McGee, and thousands of others, who've had (or were accused of) "sexual play" and / or sexual intercourse with a "White" female and / or "White" woman.
So the next day we were on the set, she avoided hanging out with me and Pat, all day, until 5pm, which was the end of our work schedule that day. She invites me, Pat, and a "white" man (that was hanging out with another group of guys on the set.) to a bar at pier 39, that was holding a celebration for the World Cup. Pat said "Hey, man this is where I draw the line, going in there, will take me back to a terrible time." That is when I realized that he was combating a drinking problem. He knew better and warned me to do the same, because it could always get rowdy in these types of places, especially during the World Cup. I went in anyway, trying to follow her, with my confused self.

Me, her, and the "white" man, are sitting there on the patio of this bar having drinks. She bought drinks for everyone. About four or five Kamakazi's later I am watching the world cup on the t.v., when I catch her looking at me, with puckered up lips, prepared to receive a kiss. So I gave her a little peck. Then, I hear this "black" male say "Ahhhhh man, he kissed her like she was his sister." Laughter broke out all around me. It was if the whole club was waiting to see if I was going to get with this "white" woman.

NOW, I am determined to get with her. She gets up and goes off to the restroom. The "white" man that was sitting with us, talks with me for about ten minutes, and then gets up and leaves too.

Fifteen minutes goes by and the "black" male who made the comment says "Man, that fine white girl likes YOU, but the white dude, is trying to get with her too. You should go get her, man"

So now I am thinking that when she gets back to the table, I'm going to kiss her passionately in front of everybody (show-offism) and get my "respect back". I glance in the dance area and see the two of them dancing together. So I go cut in and she dances with me. He comes back in, grabs her hand, takes her out the door into the front of the place. I go out in front and tell her to choose him or me. She chooses me. My mind is really blown away (double confusion sets in) now, because she choose me over this "white" dude. He acts upset and then walks off. Her and I walk to a burger joint across the street.

He comes into the burger joint and says "Khalif, can we talk?"  I say "what's up?" he says "Hey man, I think that you are cool and everything, but the three of us ain't vibing, dude."

I said "Hey, man she chose me. So get on some where"

He left again.

We leave the place and walk to her car. When we get to the corner about five feet from her car, he walks up again grabbing one of her arms, now we are doing a tug of war with her. She snatches her arms away, lays down on the ground and yells "Why don't you both just f--- me right here on the f---ing corner !"

The "white" man tells me that I should go, so that he can be alone with her. Now, I go into this let me save her from this guy mode. I say "Man, didn't she say that she didn't want you? Get out of here or its going to be some problems." He says "Okay!" and walks off.

Her and I get into her car, and I start to say how I feel about her (You know, cuz I am like "honored" that this fine "white" woman chose me, right?). I was headed for the ultimate confusion, and probably would have never came back. I wanted to feel accepted by this "white" queen (most powerful piece on the chess board) and she did that by choosing me over the "white" man, once again on a separate occasion. Anyway, I was about to ask her why, when he drives up along side of her car and yells for her to get in his car (I suspected that she was really liking all of this attention).

She says "No, I'm not getting in unless, Khalif can go with me."  He tells her that is not an option. So she refuses to get in. He says "Okay, come on lets all go to another club." She gets in the front seat, instead of the back with me. We get in the club and have some more drinks at the bar. She goes out on the dance floor and starts dancing by herself, while him and I are at the bar. I remember him saying "Khalif, man, let me drop you off at the BART station, man." Everything gets blurry, because the alcohol starts to set in, and the next thing I know, I see them getting into the car. I rush out and get in too. Now he's being persistent about taking me to the BART, and she isn't saying anything. I'm still saying no. He just starts driving around San Francisco.

It seemed like we drove around for hours, with the music playing, I heard some faints moans coming from up front. I looked up there and saw that he was rubbing between her legs. He looks at me and says "Khalif, let me take you to the BART, man." I was like dumbfounded. Mouth on the floor of his car. I was still dragging it out of the car, when he dropped me off at the BART station, which had closed at 12 am. It was like 2 am.

So, not having any place to go in S.F. and the fact that it was really cold that night, I thought maybe I'd sleep in her car if it was unlocked. I walked back to her car and slept in it, thinking that I would see her when she comes back. I didn't. I woke up at about 9am and walked to the BART and caught a train back to Oakland.

Counter Racist Compensatory Logic tells me that as long as I am a Victim of Racism in a system of Racism (White Supremacy) that my existence means nothing unless I am either of some use to "white" people or I am attempting to replace this system of White Supremacy with Justice.

Anytime that I am not aware of the how or why behind the feelings that I have, when I have them, I suspect that I am being indirectly controlled by Racist thought, speech, and /or action.


My Experiences with "White" females part one

          Webster’s New World Dictionary (1968 Edition) defines Propaganda as any organization or movement working for the propagation of particular ideas, doctrines, practices etc. It further defines it as any systematic, widespread, deliberate indoctrination or plan for such indoctrination.

I love you
Because you're white,
Not because you're charming
Or bright,
Your whiteness
Is a silky thread
Snaking through my thoughts,
In redhot patterns
Of lust and desire.

I hate you
Because you're white.
Your white meat
Is nightmare food.
White is
The skin of Evil.
You're my Moby Dick,
White Witch,
Symbol of the rope and hanging tree,
Of the burning cross.
 Loving you thus
And hating you so,
My heart is torn in two.
                                                                    - Eldridge Cleaver

On Sun 6/20/10, I was a guest on the C.O.W.S. Radio show. I was asked to talk about, what was referred to as a "Tragic Arrangement". I was told that a Tragic Arrangement is when a "non-white" person and a "white" person associate with each other for the purpose of having sexual intercourse. Under a system of Racism (White Supremacy), this kind of relationship is a Tragic Arrangement. Let me explain. My memory takes me back to when I was 5 years old, and even to 3 years (in some instances). I saw a lot of  programming (television and films). Every program that I saw presented images of "white" people showing affection for each other. I saw images of "white" females behaving in a manner that made them appear as though they were perfect.

The first "white" person on t.v. that I was attracted to, was Shirley Temple. I didn't think that I was "black". I knew that my skin was brown, but, it had not clicked to me that the color of my skin made a significant difference between us (in fact it only makes a difference because of Racism / White Supremacy). Thinking that she was the same age or close to my age, I imagined that she would be my girlfriend someday. Then one day my mother told me that Shirley Temple was already an adult by the time that she (my mom) was 8 years old and had started watching her in the movies. I was devastated. It was also at this time that both of my folks told me about the roles that Black people were limited to playing in her movies because of Racism (White Supremacy). I still wanted to be with her regardless...

New edition added on 5/1/11 :

Anyway, I remember seeing her with Mr. Bojangles and thinking "wow, she likes Black people" and at the same time disliking him for being an "Uncle Tom" and / or "Sell-out":
There was this feeling as though the "White" woman would provide me with nourishment or something ( I could hear the cow bells ringing as though I were on Gus' show, right now).

Throw in Jody Foster, Tatum O'Neal, Linda Blair, and Kristy McNichol, as the other little ones that I that were my age. Then adult "white" women like Brooke Shields, Kate Jackson, Jaclyn Smith, Cheryl Ladd, Lindsey Wagner, Angie Dickenson, Raquel Welch, the list goes on. They were on shows with titles like "Charlie's Angels", "Police Woman", "Wonder Woman", "Bionic Woman", etc. "White" was right. There were very few "non-white" females on t.v. back then. Any that were on t.v. were perceived as "unattractive". Although, there was Denise Nichols.

At this stage in my existence, there were three "white" girls within my habitat,one stayed next door, another stayed across the street, and then there was Heidi at my daycare. Heidi was the most interesting (at that time) of the three because we ( I think that she showed me how) "played house" and "doctor" a lot. I wanted to do the same with the other two, but they had dolls to act out with. BARBIE DOLLS! The first dolls I ever saw Barbie and Ken. I always used the Ken doll. Barbie had a house, car, clothes, and lots and lots of shoes. Ken had a lot of things too. Anyway, I liked playing with the Ken doll. My attempted parents noticed that I liked dolls, and started buying G.I. Joe, Star Trek, Planet of the Apes, Superman, Batman, Capt. Kirk, the Six-Million Dollar Man, and some other dolls that I had. Many times I'd forget the dolls and just pretend to be them. All of them considered to be "white" men. And most of the time the "white" kids didn't hesitate to let me know that I was only pretending to be them. Sometimes they'd tell me that I can't be any of these characters because I was "black". All of the leading "white" men in what ever program that I watched, I wanted to be like. Those men where usually tasked to save the "white / innocent / pure / angelic / princess / damsel in distress". I suspect that many "non-white" females wanted to be like the "white" women in such programs as well. Anyway, I always found a need to please the "white" girls that I was around, with the hopes that they would choose me to be their mate. Man, it's amazing how much of my memory is coming back as I write this post. I was attracted to a lot of "white" females in film, television, and in person. I still find myself attracted to lighter skinned (presumably classified as "white") females. I can remember feeling a deep need to "save" them, not realizing that in comparison to myself, I was the one who needed the most help. I am sure that everyone will agree that "white" women have no problem getting any help from anyone, when they need it.

For me, I thought (subconsciously) that as long as any attractive "white" women or any attractive "non-white" females (with skin lighter than my own) thought that I was attractive, it was enough to make me feel like I was an attractive "non-white" male. It meant that I was accepted. It's still a feeling that I wrestle with today. I still have this tremendous urge to not let my skin color determine how I function in this system. The truth is that my skin is no more important than any other part of my body. The deception is that under the system of Racism (White Supremacy) it is the number one cause for all of my problems. My skin always gets in the way, but, now most people want to pretend as though they are not thinking about it, while they are still thinking about it. For me as an individual it's also my eyes (that's another story).

4/13/12- Okay, I am back here adding to this post, because I can see that my experiences with "white" females part one, appears to get a lot of views, and thus must be constructive in some kind of way. Since this is part one, I've decided that this post will be where I come to update you on my earliest memories of any sexual experiences that I've had with "White" females. Today, what comes to mind is the "white" women that I witnessed my father-less (see Parent on page 281 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide) having "sexual play" with. I suspect I was between the ages of three and six. He brought me along with him. I think because he assumed that I was too young to know what was going on, but, I did know. I think that I learned about it from the TV. Seeing "White" people show affection for each other on TV (they didn't show affectionate "Black" people on TV in those days. In fact they didn't show "Black" people much at all.) at an early age, helped me to pick up on what I saw in his interaction with "White" women. Though he served as a Belly warmer (see page 239 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Textbook / Workbook) for "White" women, my father-less was in an attempted marriage (see Marriage on page 218 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide) with my mother-less (see Parent on page 281 of the U.I.C.C.S.C. Word Guide).

Like most so-called marriages between "non-white" people it was full of conflict. Some of which I am sure had to do with "cheating". Anyway, the era that we are speaking of was in the early 70's. "White" liberals were promoting the idea of openly having sex with anyone, anything, at anytime, and anywhere, for no other reason than pleasure . They called it the "sexual revolution".

 Most of this kind of thinking started in the city of Berkeley, which is where I was going to school at the time. This is the era when terms and names like "Hippie", "Black Militant", "Lesbian", "Gay", "Vietnam Vet", "Huey Newton", "Patty Hearst", "Jim Jones", " The Zebra Killers", "The Zodiac", "Ronald Reagen", "Charles Manson", "George Jackson", "Richard Nixon", "Angela Davis" "J. Edger Hoover", were all in prominent use. Berkeley was one big "White" Liberal experiment. It was in the 70's that the "status quo" in this city attempted to make "Black" people comfortable with the affects of White Supremacy, by making both Malcolm X's and M.L.K.'s birthdays local holidays. This was 20 years before M.L.K.'s birthday was a national one. Okay, I think that you get the picture. It was while I attended these schools that my father-less, met most of these "White" women. He was a "Vietnam Vet" who wasn't laboring in exchange for money on a regular basis. See the so-called U.S.A. lost the "Vietnam War". Most "White" people in positions of power were upset about the whole thing, and thus weren't offing work to "Vietnam Vets", let alone a "Black" one. My father-less used his time and energy towards increasing the educational standards of "Non-white" children within the Berkeley school system. You see "White" women were made to appear to be thrown into the bunch of other so-called "Minorities".


Monday, February 08, 2010

Enforcement Officials Abuse Asset Forfeiture

On November 18, 2009, Shukree Simmons, a "black" male, and his business partner were driving from Macon, Georgia, back to Atlanta after selling his truck for $3,700. While traveling though Lamar County, Mr. Simmons was pulled over by two Enforcement Officials who did not give a reason for the stop. Mr. Simmons and his business partner, went through the usual questioning that so many "non-white" people go through when encountering Enforcement Officials. The Enforcement Officials searched both of them and the car. The search even included using a sniffing dog, but no evidence for the type of behavior that could lead to Greater Confinement was found.

Not accepting Mr. Simmons’ explanation that he acquired his money from the sale of his truck, the Enforcement Officials decided to confiscate the $3,700 on the suspicion that the cash was acquired from criminal actions committed by Mr. Simmons. They have this authority under the "Georgia" Civil Asset Forfeiture Code. They then allowed their victims to leave.

As soon as he was able to do so, Mr. Simmons mailed to the Enforcement Officials, the evidence (bill of sale and title for the truck)that proves how he got the money.  Mr. Simmons was informed that he had to file a "legal claim" to get his money back.

Now, consider this position that the system of Racism (White Supremacy) puts its victims in. Here is a situation where a "non-white" person has to PROVE that their money is rightfully theirs and that it was acquired through legitimate business practices, after it had been taken from that "non-white" person WITHOUT PROOF that it was not their money or that it had been earned illegitimately. I suspect that for most "non-white" people, it would have stopped there. Seeing that so many of us have a general lack in our behavior for meeting deadlines, researching, filling out paperwork, etc. Can you imagine how many "non-white" people placed in this same position, would give up on this?  Considering, all of the general things that one needs to say and do when dealing with this law?

Check it:

[b][i]"(n) If the estimated value of personal property seized is $25,000.00 or less, the district attorney may elect to proceed under the provisions of this subsection in the following manner:

(1) Notice of the seizure of such property shall be posted in a prominent location in the courthouse of the county in which the property was seized. Such notice shall include a description of the property, the date and place of seizure, the conduct giving rise to forfeiture, a statement that the owner of such property has 30 days within which a claim must be filed, and the violation of law alleged;

(2) A copy of the notice, which shall include a statement that the owner of such property has 30 days within which a claim must be filed, shall be served upon an owner, interest holder, or person in possession of the property at the time of seizure as provided in subsection (i) of this Code section and shall be published for at least three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the seizure was made;

(3) The owner or interest holder may file a claim within 30 days after the second publication of the notice of forfeiture by sending the claim to the seizing law enforcement agency and to the district attorney by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested;

(4) The claim must be signed by the owner or interest holder under penalty of perjury and must set forth:

(A) The caption of the proceedings as set forth on the notice of pending forfeiture and the name of the claimant;

(B) The address at which the claimant will accept mail;

(C) The nature and extent of the claimant́s interest in the property;

(D) The date, identity of the transferor, and circumstances of the claimant́s acquisition of the interest in the property;

(E) The specific provision of this Code section relied on in asserting that the property is not subject to forfeiture;

(F) All essential facts supporting each assertion; and

(G) The precise relief sought;

(5) If a claim is filed, the district attorney shall file a complaint for forfeiture as provided in subsection (o) or (p) of this Code section within 30 days of the actual receipt of the claim. A person who files a claim shall be joined as a party; and

(6) If no claim is filed within 30 days after the second publication of the notice of forfeiture, all right, title, and interest in the property is forfeited to the state and the district attorney shall dispose of the property as provided in subsection (u) of this Code section."

I listed the specific part of this law, that says what a person has to do in order to get their money back. You can view the whole law at the link listed above. It was easy for me to find it on the computer. How many "non-white" people don't have a computer? How many don't know what to do with a computer in order to find it? How many can't afford internet access? How many would know where to find this law without a computer? How many would think to check a law library? or the regular library for that matter. Most would probably think that they would have to get a lawyer, and then the next thought would probably be that they can't afford a lawyer. In Georgia, a basic retainer fee (the down payment to get the lawyer started on your case) is $5,000.

Do most VsOR have access to this kind of money? In the case of Mr.Simmons', he'd have to spend more money to get the attorney, then the amount of money that he is attempting to get back.

Regardless of this fact, Mr. Simmons, spoke to a lawyer anyway. That lawyer gave him some constructive information telling him that he should contact the ACLU.

According to the ACLU, which took Simmons' case in December 2009, they "sent a letter to Lamar County Sheriff Larry Waller asserting Mr. Simmons’s right to the money and seeking its return. Waller responded that he agreed that the state had no right to the funds, but directed Mr. Simmons to initiate a claim. The ACLU pushed back, and in early January the Sheriff returned the money to Mr. Simmons."

These "Asset forfeiture laws" have created an opportunity for Enforcement Officials to acquire huge profits, I suspect most of which came from Victims of Racism. The total amount acquired by use of these "Asset forfeiture laws" in 2003, was $38,330,861.00 in "Georgia" alone. Imagine whats going on in the other "states". The ACLU says in  its article that "Georgia’s law permits one-third of seizure proceeds to return to local law enforcement, which can be used for any law enforcement purpose except for the payment of salaries or rewards. The rest of the money goes into the local general fund, and must be used for programs such as drug treatment and witness protection. However, in Georgia and most other states, if police want access to more of the money for their budgets, they may turn over a drug-related seizure to the D.E.A., thereby federalizing the seizure. The DEA 'does the paperwork', handles any claims to the money by individuals (who must sue in federal court), and returns 80 percent of the money to the police, with no state law strings attached. Police may then use the funds for any law enforcement purpose, including payment of salaries. This process, known as equitable sharing, permits local law enforcement to do an end run around state civil asset forfeiture laws."

The ACLU also said in their article that "Reports from other asset forfeiture cases in the media and in lawsuits indicate that police do not seize assets from all equally. Instead, they target those persons they associate with criminal behavior and drug trafficking. The result is a regime of racial profiling of black and Latino drivers on the highways, who are stopped and stripped of their money based on minimal or non-existent evidence.

Mr. Simmons' case demonstrates the extent to which civil asset forfeiture laws, formed to assist officers in fighting drug crimes, are misused against people of color in cases in which there is no evidence of criminal activity. Mr. Simmons was never arrested and never charged. Instead, the Sheriff's department took his money, admitted that it has no right to keep the money, and told Mr. Simmons that he must make a legal claim to get it back. The ACLU seeks to challenge this and other civil asset forfeiture law abuses. The era of easy money for police departments by wrongfully taking cash from vulnerable drivers must end."

In my opinion one reason that has probably made it easy for Enforcement Officials to seize people's money when there was no correct reason to seize it, was because the individuals involved my have consented to having their vehicles searched. They probably were thinking, "I don't have anything to hide", and let the Enforcement Officials conduct a search. I used to do it all of the time, until it downed on me that these searches take a lot of time, are embarrassing, and can be humiliating as well. Sometimes they unscrew the seats! Many of my days have been ruined because of these kind of stops. Sticking with the constitution , you can say no to the Enforcement Officials searching your vehicle. As long as you do not have any felonies. In most states if you have a felony, many of the constitutional laws don't apply to you. I suspect that this one of the reasons why many "non-white" people, are persuaded (through Racist Propaganda) to practice the type of behavior that leads them to acquire felonies. Anyway, if your money is in your glove box, or in a brief case, or even an envelope inside your car, and you say no to a search, you should be in the clear of keeping your money. I ain't no lawyer, just a Victim of Racism, making a suggestion.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Current Situation in Haiti

"...Hayti (is) the glory of the blacks and terror of tyrants...I hope that she may be united, keeping a strict look-out for tyrants, for if they get the least chance to injure her, they will avail themselves of it...But one thing which gives me joy is, that they (the Haitians) are men (and women) who would be cut off to a man before they would yield to the combined forces of the whole world-----in fact, if the whole world was combined against them it could not do anything with them..." ---David Walker

from: David Walker’s Appeal, 1829

There is some kind of  Racist interest in "Haiti". Some years ago the Racists (White Supremacists) removed Jean-Claude Aristide who was literally selected by the Racist Liberals to be "President of Haiti" in 1991. Back then for some reason the Racist Conservatives were against it.

Anyway, the "Haitian" military did not go for it and in-acted a coup in September 1991, taking Aristide out as "President of Haiti". However, the Racist Liberals used the threat of violence against the "Haitian" military, and Aristide became "President of Haiti" again from 1994 to 1996 and then from 2001 to 2004. In February 2004, the Racist Conservatives, used the threat of violence to remove him, by literally kidnapping him from his residence and dropping him off in "Africa".

It appeared to me that like Saddam Hussein, Manual Noriega, Idi Amin, Robert Mugabe, Muammar Quadafi, and many other Victims (of what I call Racist {White Supremacist} Ventriloquism), who have been removed, killed, or sanctioned, Aristide no longer wanted to be a their puppet. He attempted to cut the strings and forgot who made him president.

Usually, when this type of activity is observed, it means that the area is either of strategic importance or their is a particular resource that the Racists must maintain control over. "Haiti" has a few reasons:

The first is that it was the first so-called "Black Republic" or "Nation" on this planet. According to His-Story, it achieved victory over its oppressors while the rest of the "non-white" people were enslaved on the rest of the planet. It's rebellion inspired other slaves to rebel and caused the ruling class "white" people (leaders of "Britain", "France", "Spain", etc.) to stop fighting each other and unify their efforts against "Haiti". I suspect that from that day on "Haiti" had to appear to the rest of the world as an example of "how niggers can mess up a country".

The second is that geographically and militarily, it is very close to the habitat of the most powerful Racists (White Supremacists) in what they call the "North Western Hemisphere". Which means that it holds value as a place that cannot have effective numbers of people working against them.

The third which just came to me as I sit here looking at George Bush's involvement in this, must be resources. If he gets involved, its got to be connected to Oil. Yep. Sure enough.

Rene Preval and "W"
"Haiti" has a huge Oil Reserve that has remained untapped for a decades.

Racist Economic interests in "Haiti" (very informative source on "Haiti")

The CIA World Fact book ranks "Haiti" as 163 on the list of areas that has a "stock of proved reserves of crude oil in barrels (bbl). Proved reserves are those quantities of petroleum which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions."

The current "President of Haiti", Rene Preval, is a member of the "National Institute for Mineral Resources". He is who the Racists (White Supremacists) have replaced Aristide with.

I predict that "Haiti" is about to under go

Racial Show Casing -Preval and his "wife" Elizabeth) will be very popular after this event is over. Thousands of "non-white" people will almost over night appear to be successful all over "Haiti" in the months that will follow.

Racial Population Tailoring- This is what is happening in "Haiti" right now. Will it be millions of people found dead? or hundreds of thousands found dead?  I don't know. But, it will be enough to allow the Racists to have instant control of the areas where "non-white" people had spent a lot of time and energy.

I suspect that the Racists (White Supremacists) have caused this earthquake.

"Earthquakes induced by human activity have been documented in a few locations in the United States, Japan, and Canada. The cause was injection of fluids into deep wells for waste disposal and secondary recovery of oil, and the use of reservoirs for water supplies. Most of these earthquakes were minor. The largest and most widely known resulted from fluid injection at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver, Colorado. In 1967, an earthquake of magnitude 5.5 followed a series of smaller earthquakes. Injection had been discontinued at the site in the previous year once the link between the fluid injection and the earlier series of earthquakes was established. (Nicholson, Craig and Wesson, R.L., 1990, Earthquake Hazard Associated with Deep Well Injection--A Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1951, 74 p.)"-  USGS

"Scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) say that oil production can cause earthquakes," - source

"Here's how it works: With high-tech equipment, oil companies pinpoint oil-rich areas and use large drills to puncture the surface below the sea, sometimes as deep as 10,000 feet. As this pricey fluid gets sucked from the sediment pores, the surrounding rocks shift positions to fill in the newly vacated spaces. At a large scale, for example the volume displaced when millions of barrels of oil are produced, the land movement can actually cause a mini-seismic earthquake, according to Robert Morton, a USGS coastal geologist." - source  

Five ways to cause man made earthquakes

Racial Dislocation Many of the "Haitian" people have already been dislocated, and will be relocated to the "Dominican Republic". There they will be placed in tents and trailers and most of them will remain there.

"Haiti" is about to under go a huge face lift right now. Hundreds of Millions of dollars are about to be invested into rebuilding its infrastructure. Big corporate contracts in whatever industries that benefited from the War in Iraq and in Katrina. Possibly the same companies that were involved in the rebuilding of those areas.

I could see a Racist Suspect responding to this, by saying that "its a new day", and that "SynQ is paranoid". Well whatever, time and time again, when the Racists get involved in "helping" huge numbers of "non-white" people history has revealed that it usually involved some kind of deception on the part of the Racists.

So kiss SynQ's butt today

The Harry Reid Controversy

Let's face it, Harry Reid made the correct observation, about Obama. The truth is that everyone knows that Obama's lighter skin and use of words did help in his Presidential SELECTION. Under a system of Racism (White Supremacy), lighter skin is made to appear as though it is better than darker skin.  Though, all "non-white" people are mistreated, only the lighter skin "non-white" people, are allowed to access certain areas of the system.

The Racist Propaganda is too thick. Listen to the playback: "White is right, Yellow is mellow, Brown stick around, Red is dead, Black stay back."

Would "White" people have accepted the idea of a "non-white" person with the same skin color as Flava Flav as being the president?

Darker skinned "non-white" people are seen as "stupid", "lazy","ugly","emotional","savage","criminal", etc.  And this image is promoted at all times, in all places, and in all areas of people activity. Albeit Micheal Jackson knew the answer to that. Call him crazy, but he was doing exactly what the system trained him to do. Anyone who thinks that Micheal Jackson was popular all over the planet just because of his music, is not looking at the situation from all angles. For real.  "Non-white" people all over this planet spend billions in currency on skin lightening creams. Why?

Checkout Sammy Sousa. Hell, a lot  of "non-white" people would not like Obama, if he was darker skinned. Most of us don't even like our own skin. It may appear that I am defending Reid. I am not. I merely want to point out that his words reveal a truth, that could lead to an open dialog on the so-called "Race" problem. The Racists (White Supremacists) don't want that to happen, so making it appear that Reid's words are mistreating Obama, or any other Victim of Racism, on the basis of color is a Racist Propaganda Tactic  (I can see it, but have not yet found the precise words to describe it) designed to confuse huge numbers of "non-white" people, rendering and keeping them non-effective in countering Racism (White Supremacy). Why don't the Racists want a dialog on the "race" problem? Because  recognizing that a  "race" problem exists, would mean that a solution, would have to be found. Recognizing that  a solution would have to be found, would mean that a lot of questions have to be answered. Answering those questions in order to solve the "Race" problem, would lead to establishing Justice. Reid's words about Obama revealed a glitch in the matrix, and all of this hoopla, about it, is designed to get most "non-white" people to not see it as such.

Question: Who benefits most from the use of skin lightening AKA "skin whitening" cream, under a system of Racism (White Supremacy)?  A Victim of Racism ( "non-white" person)? or a Racist (White Supremacist)?

Friday, January 08, 2010


CONSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION: RACIST PROPAGANDA is based on excerpts from the out of print book, entitled "The Fine Art of Propaganda; A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches" by The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.

ATTENTION: This article is a supplement to THE UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE / SYSTEM / CONCEPT a textbook / workbook for thought, speech, and / or action for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy) written by Neely Fuller Jr. I recommend that you read it, in order to get a better understanding of this concept. From here on out I will refer to it as the U.I.C.C.S.C.
“The seeds of the destruction of Racism (White Supremacy) are implanted in the very existence of Racism itself.” – Neely Fuller Jr.

(continued from last post)

If we are in a system of Racism (White Supremacy) and we are dominated and subjugated, by Racism (White Supremacy) at all times, in all places, and in all areas of people activity, then all Propaganda must be Racist Propaganda, because no propaganda has eliminated the system of Racism (White Supremacy) and thus indirectly supports it. REPEAT: no matter what kind of propaganda it appears to be if it does not reveal truth, promote justice, and make sure that the person who needs help gets the most constructive help they need, it should be considered Racist Propaganda.

If it has any affect on motivating effective numbers of people to make an attempt at resisting Racism (White Supremacy), and / or if it reveals truth, promotes justice, and makes sure that the person who needs help gets the most constructive help that they need it should be recognized as Counter-Racist Propaganda.

The Racist Propagandist attempts to influence the minds of people into co-operating with Racism (White Supremacy). They do not want their victims to carefully scrutinize and be critical of the words and images that they use. Their ultimate objective is to move you to continue to behave (think, speak, and / or act) in a specific way that is not constructive in replacing Racism (White Supremacy) with Justice. It will be a challenge, but, I suspect that Racist Propaganda can be spotted if one follows the logic.

Right now we are bombarded with so much propaganda, coming at us from every direction, that we will not start to see more of it, until we start questioning everything. The television is the main source of it all. I heard Dr. Welsing say that every Victim of Racism should take a strip of paper with the words “THE SYSTEM OF RACISM (WHITE SUPREMACY)” on it and put it right over the screen so that we could constantly be reminded of what we are looking at. I totally agree with her. So start by questioning everything that you see on the television. In addition to that you should put that same kind of strip on your radio as well.

Let’s look at the methods of propaganda. Some of the terms that were developed to describe these methods were confusing to me, so I have changed them to make them reveal the truth of what they describe. Where the term is confusing to me, I will add my compensatory functional term, and give my reasons for making the change. I will list all of the methods here first and then write about each one separately.

Here are the methods of propaganda:
  1. Name Calling 
  2. Glittering Generality
  3. Transfer
  4. Testimonial
  5. Plain Folks
  6. Card Stacking
  7. Band Wagon

To be continued

Tuesday, December 22, 2009


CONSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION: RACIST PROPAGANDA is based on excerpts from the out of print book, entitled "The Fine Art of Propaganda; A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches" by The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.

ATTENTION: This article is a supplement to THE UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE / SYSTEM / CONCEPT a textbook / workbook for thought, speech, and / or action for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy) written by Neely Fuller Jr. I recommend that you read it, in order to get a better understanding of this concept. From here on out I will refer to it as the U.I.C.C.S.C.
“The seeds of the destruction of Racism (White Supremacy) are implanted in the very existence of Racism itself.” – Neely Fuller Jr.

(Continued from last post)

The Institute for Propaganda Analysis states that propaganda itself “has been used in a halting way for centuries, within the past few years [1937] we have seen it prepare the way for Hitler to seize the Saar, Austria, the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. It is called a new instrument of aggression because development has given it an effectiveness never before experienced in the history of the world.” It appears to me that propaganda has been used on “non-white” people for centuries and that in the “Hitler” period of history it was used against “white” people, which was the cause for The Institute for Propaganda Analysis, to form and produce materials warning “white” people of this method. It is my opinion that most constructive information is produced by “white” people for other “white” people. Most Victims of Racism usually stumble across the information and others, however, deliberately look for it. I have delegated Propaganda as a minor area of the major area of people activity called Politics (people relations). More Victims of Racism should study it. It's use can help us in getting effective numbers of people to start thinking, speaking, and acting in a manner that resists the system of Racism (White Supremacy).

My Compensatory Functional Term (see page 235, U.I.C.C.S.C. for explanation), for what I am looking at and attempting to describe here is RACIST PROPAGANDA and the Compensatory Functional Definition for this term is the expression of any thought, speech, and / or action by an individual Racist (White Supremacist) or groups of Racists (White Supremacists) that are deliberately designed to influence the thoughts, speech, and / or actions of an individual Victim of Racism and / or groups of Victims of Racism with reference to the predetermined end of indirectly cooperating with the system of Racism (White Supremacy).

RACIST PROPAGANDA is a tool of aggression, because it is deception and deception is indirect violence. It is what the Racists use to keep dominating and subjugating us. The direct violence comes when the victim no longer falls for the deception.

RACIST PROPAGANDA is “spread broadcast” by the Racists in all of the nine major areas of people activity through “political parties, labor unions, business associations, farm organizations, patriotic societies, churches, schools, other agencies, etc. And they are repeated in conversation by millions of individuals classified as “white” and “non-white.”

“If” [Victims of Racism] “are to have a clear understanding of” our terrible condition “and what to do about it, we must be able to recognize” RACIST PROPAGANDA when we see it, “to analyze it, and to appraise it.” We “must be able to discover whether it is” RACIST PROPAGANDA, which is of course “in line with their interests of promoting and maintaining Racism (White Supremacy). In other words we should learn how to determine if it is propaganda that may deceive us into co-operating with the system.

(to be continued)

Sunday, December 13, 2009


CONSTRUCTIVE INFORMATION: RACIST PROPAGANDA is based on excerpts from the out of print book, entitled "The Fine Art of Propaganda; A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches" by The Institute for Propaganda Analysis.

ATTENTION: This article is a supplement to THE UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE / SYSTEM / CONCEPT a textbook / workbook for thought, speech, and / or action for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy) written by Neely Fuller Jr. I recommend that you read it, in order to get a better understanding of this concept. From here on out I will refer to it as the U.I.C.C.S.C.

“The seeds of the destruction of Racism (White Supremacy) are implanted in the very existence of Racism itself.” – Neely Fuller Jr.

Webster’s New World Dictionary (1968 Edition) defines Propaganda as any organization or movement working for the propagation of particular ideas, doctrines, practices etc. It further defines it as any systematic, widespread, deliberate indoctrination or plan for such indoctrination.

"The Fine Art of Propaganda” states that “As generally understood, propaganda is opinion expressed for the purpose of influencing actions of individuals or groups. More formally, the Institute for Propaganda Analysis has defined propaganda as ‘expression of opinion or action by individuals or groups deliberately designed to influence opinions or actions of other individuals or groups with reference to predetermined ends.’”

I suspect the main reason for the continued existence of the system of Racism (White Supremacy) is because of a constant “confusion of conflicting propaganda, Babel of voices in many tongues shouting charges, counter-charges, assertions, and contradictions that assail us continually.” And the Racists (White Supremacists) are deliberately promoting “conflicting propaganda”, through their use of deception. So Deception is the cause, and our confusion is the affect.

Keeping in line with the idea that the two basic methods of practicing Racism (White Supremacy) are 1) Deception and 2) Violence and the fact that all of the Victims of Racism on the planet are not dead, and using the 80 / 20 Rule, I suspect that out of these two methods, Deception is used 80% of the time, and Violence takes the remaining 20%.

If we can learn to eliminate the confusion, we could then see the Deception and counter it. We have to follow the logic and make carefully calculated moves like on a chess board.

WHITE = Offense / Defense

BLACK (non-white) = Defense / Offense

The Racists attack with Deception, we defend and counter with Truth.
Learning the methods of Propaganda will help us “see” their moves.

(To be continued)

Monday, December 07, 2009

On Logic

The truth about logic is that it is nothing more than "practical reasoning" and "clear thinking" (which can change, depending on who you are talking to, if you are not paying close attention to their words). The Racists (White Supremacists) would rather have us believe that logic is something that they created or something that only they can do or teach, which is highly ILLOGICAL, when you use LOGIC to think about it. Thoughts, speech, and / or actions that are applied without emotion is essentially what logic is. Many "white" people attempt to make it appear to be more complicated, than it is, because their objective is deception. Logic truly did "come with the universe", as Fuller put it. You just have to trust yourself, with the observations that you make and the theories that you have drawn from those observations and be honest enough to admit to yourself and others that some of your theories are incorrect, once it has been [u]logically proven[/u] that your theories are incorrect. Logic does not mean that you are perfect. It means that you are striving to be perfect. It means that you are attempting to solve your problems in the most efficient manner. You observe the problem. Draw a conclusion about that problem. Attempt to solve that problem. Record the results of the attempt to solve that problem. These are all things that our brains can automatically do. What makes it really work is when you have more than one brain attempting to solve the problem. That is where the logic in Fullers work comes in. It's sole purpose is to get people to start focusing on solving the greatest problem that ever existed. The so-called "Race" problem. Where most "non-white" people get it incorrect is when we attach emotions to our thoughts, speech, and actions. And that is because we have been trained to get emotional when certain words and images are used, in our relationships with each other. It is my theory that we all have been conditioned to think, speak, and act emotionally with everything that we do. In other words it appears that there are more "white" people who think, logically (because it comes naturally) today, than "non-white" people because the smart and powerful Racists (White Supremacists) who existed centuries ago, trained our ancestors to behave emotionally first and then to either think reasonably second, or not at all. They niggerized our ancestors and the behavior of our ancestors was passed down to us, and so presently, we think that logic can only be obtained from "white" people. AND many "non-white" people don't want to attempt the theories presented by other "non-white" people, because they have not attempted to test them before they deny if they are true. This is where having REASONABLE arguments come in at. When the theories of niggers get challenged by other niggers, niggers want to lie, cheat, steal, and even kill to force other niggers to believe their theories. If a nigger finds that one of the theories of another nigger is incorrect then they will disagree with all of the other theories supposed by the nigger whose theory they disagreed with.

Sunday, December 06, 2009

I am a Victim Of Racism: First Recollection

My recollections will not necessarily be in order, but they will be posted as they come to my mind. I am a Victim of Racism, because when I was seven years old the "white" man that stayed across the street from me grabbed me by the neck of my shirt, slightly choking me, and kicked me in my behind. His name was Douglas Green, and he had two sons, Joshua and Aaron. They were the boys in my habitat (place where I spent most of my time and energy) at that time. I was over at their house one day and we were playing. Their mother gave me a scoop of Rocky Road ice cream on a cone, I told her that I would not like it, because it had marshmallows in it, but she had already made it and told me to just eat it anyway, saying to take them out. So I tried to eat it. Joshua, Aaron, Douglas, and myself were in their backyard. It was too many marshmallows. I ended up throwing the ice cream on the side of their garage. Douglas saw me. "What did you just throw back there?". I said "Just some rocks" and then I started picking up rocks and throwing them on the side of the garage. He got really mad at me and said that I was lying. He grabbed me by my shirt collar, saying that it was time for me to go home, and kicked me. I felt so humiliated and embarrassed, I ran over to another side of their house (still in the backyard), stood their for a few seconds trying to understand what had just happened to me. I claimed over their fence, instead of going out through their gate, so that I could avoid asking Douglas to open it for me. I walked slowly across the street to the house that my folks rented. My mother, who was on the phone, when I came in and sat down. "What's wrong, son?" "Nothing." "You don't look like nothing isn't wrong. what's wrong?" "Douglas, kicked me." "What! Douglas kicked you! Go in the backyard and tell your Daddy!" When I got back there my dad was raking leaves. I told him about my assault. Before I could explain everything else, he had already left me back there. I swear that he left so fast that the rake was left standing in the air. He went over there and beat the crap out of Douglas. Anyway, I had never seen Douglas hit his own children and from their own admission he'd never hit them. I used to here them cursing at their mom all of the time. "C'mon shit, Mom. why can't I do it?" They used to get away with a lot. Anyway, I suspect that Douglas did what he did to me because I was a "non-white" person and he thought that he could have got away with mistreating me. Actually he did.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

C'mon. Would this have happened if he were a "white" person?

By now you should have heard about the "White House state dinner party crashers." I suspect that the thought would not have even crossed her mind to enter the White House, when Clinton and Bush were presidents. But, many of you are going to say "SynQ, you're really reaching on this one." And as far as security goes? Whom ever was in charge of security that night and the agents who let them in , would have been fired by now, under dubya and his daddy. Look how close she got to him. Could you image a much darker skinned person ( whose not on the guest list) getting this close to Bush or Clinton? Think about it. She is shaking his hand!

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Jack Johnson: "Obscuring what happened along the way does him no justice."

"Jack Johnson's life was a constant fight against the attitudes of the day, and he won most of them by knockout. Obscuring what happened along the way does him no justice." - Glenn Hauman, Assistant Editor For The Original Johnson Comic Book Series. I can only imagine the chuckles that came from Mr. Hauman as he wrote those words, addressed to me about my critical view of his ghost written work. His last ten words, reveal a truth, that demonstrates that his team emphatically did Jack Johnson "no justice". Mr. Hauman either purposely obscured the truth or is totally unaware of what the truth is. I suspect the former because I can't see how someone with his writing skill could not have read the truth of what Jack Johnson wrote about his own experiences. Mr. Johnson's autobiography is a true inspiration and nothing close to the toilet paper that is referred to as the "Original Johnson Comic Book Series". My hunch was correct about the comic book being a deceptive work that "obscures" the truth. I read his autobiography from cover to cover looking for many of the situations that appear in the comic book series and I have to say that this comic book can serve no other constructive purpose than to serve as flooring for the bottom of a hamster's cage or I maybe I could crumple it up to make it real soft for wiping my ass with. I just don't know. It might not even be worth wiping my ass with. And here I will prove it. I will show you in the order that it was revealed to me. First, the truth mixed with falsehood: These are the pages in the toilet paper.....I mean.....the "Comic Book", that details Johnson's experience, as a "hobo", riding as a stowaway on the railroad to New York to find Steve Broadie. According to the comic book a "white" man attempted to sodomize Johnson on the train, but he was saved by a "black" male who kicks the "white" man off of the train just in the nick of time. Once again, as I pointed out in earlier posts on this crap, Johnson is pictured being sodomized by a "white" man. Whats interesting though is that these pages tell three lies about Johnson. One is that Johnson never road the rails to New York. Two is that he never was sodomized on the train and there is no evidence that he was ever sodomized for that matter. Three, the few times that he rode the rails, he does not mention meeting or riding with anyone, other than the railroad employees who kicked him off of the train. In Chapter Two pages 20 to 21, of Johnson's Autobiography, entitled "The Stowaway". Mr. Johnson reveals the truth: I have uploaded here what I call part one of the only page (page 21) that describes "travels" on the "rails" and it was brief. I made the page large enough for you to read with your own eyes, the very truth that smacks the falsehood outta toilet paper. And it appears that all of his "rail riding" never got him outside of Galveston, Texas. Read it. Notice how he mentions his "father"? If you read The Original Johnson #2, you will remember that it portrayed him as having an abusive "mother" and implied that he was an only child growing up in a single "parent" household. LIES! It was actually his sister who urged him on (with words and not violence) to go and fight, not a gang of "white" boys calling him a nigger, as implied in this snot rag called a "comic book", but one "non-white" male who was bigger than him. I am suspecting that this individual was a "non-white" male because, throughout the book, Johnson states when a person is a "white" person and because it was in the Jim Crow era, when it was not very common for "white" teenagers and "non-white" teenagers to interact with each other. Here's the other part of page 21. Notice how Johnson says that he stowed away on a boat that he believed was bound for New York? After a very interesting adventure as a sponge fisherman and battling a 23 foot long shark, he stowed away on another ship that was actually bound for New York. I suspect that Jack Johnson's "story" was purposely put in comic book form to deceive people, especially, Victims of Racism away from learning about the true Jack Johnson. I was amazed to know that he wrote his own biography. The system had me convinced that he was a big black dumb ass nigger who chased "white" women (his first "wife" was a "non-white" female), that did absolutely nothing constructive. That is far from the truth. He was a business owner (he owned numerous businesses), a traveler, an actor, a bullfighter, a race car driver, a writer, and there are other interesting things to learn about him. I had always thought that he died young, but he was 68 years old when he was killed in a car crash in Raleigh, N.C. If you have read the full comic book series, but have not read "Jack Johnson is a Dandy"(Jack Johnson in his own words), and then you go around speaking about Mr. Johnson as though what you read about him in these comic books were true, you will be in support of "Obscuring what happened along the way" Which is exactly what these comic books are doing.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Regarding Barack Obama

The following information was published in the LA Times on the day that Jack Johnson became the first "black" heavyweight champian, it was presented to me by another VOR, who has his own blog as well. and seems to fit yesterday's occasion. This is what many are thinking today but would only say behind closed doors. As one admitted Racist (White Suremacist) told me, every "non-white" person becomes a nigger as soon as they leave the room. "Message to White people" from the July 6, 1910 issue of the LA Times(revised by me a little bit) "The White man's mental supremacy is fully established, and for the present cannot be taken from him. He has arithmetic and algebra, chemistry and electricity; he has Moses, David, Homer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron and Burns; he has Herschel, Tyndall, Darwin and Edison, to fall back upon. His superiority does not rest on any huge bulk of muscle, but on brain development that has weighed worlds and charmed the most subtle secrets from the heart of nature. The members of the White race who are not a disgrace to it will bear no resentment toward the black [people] because of this single victory in the [presidency]. That would be to manifest lamentable weakness, not strength; stupid foolishness, not wisdom; a cowardly disposition not manliness. Let the White man who is worthy of the great inheritance won for him by his race and handed down to him by his ancestors "take his medicine" like a man. If he put his hope and the hope of his race in the White man who [ran for the 2008 presidential election], let him recognize his foolishness, and in his disappointed hope let him take up this new "White man's burden" and bear it like a man, not collapse under it like a weakling." "A Word To The Black Man" from the July 6, 1910 issue of the LA Times (with a little revision by me) "Do not point your nose too high. Do not swell your chest too much. Do not boast to loudly. Do not be puffed up. Let not your ambition be inordinate or take a wrong direction. Let no treasured resentment rise up and spill over. Remember, you have done nothing at all. You are just the same member of society you were last week. You will be treated on your personal merits. Your place in the world is just what it was. You are on no higher plane, deserve no new consideration and will get none. No man will think a bit higher of you because your complexion is the same as that of the [president]. Remember that if it did establish the fact that man for man all through the two [peoples], yours was capable of being wrought into the best pugilist (which is not the case,) even then there would be no room for becoming swollen with pride. That would not justify your jumping at the very illogical conclusion that you are "on top". You are no nearer that mark than you were before the [inaugaration] took place. You must depend on other influences to put your race on higher ground, and you must depend on personal achievement to put yourself on higher ground. Never forget that in human affairs brains count more than muscle. If you have ambition for yourself or your [people], you must try for something better in development than that of the [nigger]."

Interesting video added on 11/4/12:

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

I am not Surprised at the Murder of Oscar Grant.

Late breaking news from me about the murder of Oscar Grant III. Everyone's asking SynQ "what do you think about what happened?" Well, I think the same damn thing that I thought when Sean Bell, Gus Rugly, Amadou Diallo, and the thousands of other VORs who were killed by the Enforcement Officials of the system of Racism (White Supremacy) though out history. Which is that it will not stop until effective numbers of "non-white" people start thinking, speaking, and acting to counter Racism (White Supremacy) at all times, in all places, and in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex and War. We should no longer be surprised at this kind of mistreatment. We should expect it until we get Justice for all of us! The pressure is on. The marching and behind the scenes hell raising done by some "non-white" and "white" people who wanted justice for Oscar Grant, spoke to a smart and powerful "white" person named Jerry Brown (California's top enforcement official) , who in turn motivated another smart and powerful "white" person, Tom Orloff to get involved enough to arrest (for the first time that I know of) an enforcement official for the murder of a VOR! Now that is what surprised me! The San Francisco Chronicle states that "The conclusion by Oakland police, contained in a legal filing made public Wednesday, contributed to Alameda County prosecutors' decision to charge Mehserle, 27, with murdering 22-year-old Oscar Grant of Hayward. It was an extraordinary decision. Several legal experts said they could recall no instance of a police officer in California being charged with murder for an on-duty incident, and Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff said he had never brought such a case in his 14 years on the job." But, I am still skeptical, because when they put those Enforcement Officials on trial for what they did to Rodney King, I thought that King would get justice. But they were found not guilty. So we'll see.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

The "Original Johnson" Comic book review part three

Glenn Hauman, the "assistant editor" of "The Original Johnson" Comic book left this comment attached to part one of my review, which has now become an investigation: "There's no ghost writer. Trevor has been working on this project for years, writing and pencilling. We're just happy to, shall we say, expose The Original Johnson. That said, I didn't notice the coloring mistake rendering the stick transparent and suggestive in your second example. I'll make sure it gets fixed. Your third example-- you skip over that in the very next panel, a black man punches the potential rapist in the mouth and throws him off the train. I'm going to be very interested in how you react to Trevor's depiction of some of Johnson's later acts, including marrying white women at a time when that was illegal, and Johnson's prosecution under the White Slavery act of 1910. Jack Johnson's life was a constant fight against the attitudes of the day, and he won most of them by knockout. Obscuring what happened along the way does him no justice." Now, read what I wrote in my first post about this book. Did he deny most of what I said? Does his comment about "exposing the 'original Johnson" go with what I said about the mockery of Jack Johnson being compared to a penis? Instead of being the "Original Man" (as "black" people are sometimes referred to being.) Its the "Original Penis". It is one big inside joke. In my opinion. Anyway, I ordered Jack Johnson's biography and I am going to go through it with a "fine tooth" comb. I am not denying that some of what is said in this comic book is the truth, but there are too many details in this comic book, that to me would be impossible to know about 89 years after his death. I could be incorrect, but it doesn't appear that there are a lot of sources of accurate information about him. Anyway something is up if my blog got the attention of a Racist Suspect writer associated with this comic book. Can you imagine having your story being "edited" by a Racist Suspect? Glenn Hauman apparently is a sci-fi writer, and has written many books for the "Star Trek" series. I suspect this makes him qualified to be THE ghost writer for this comic book. To back up my point, I am listing sources that demonstrate Glenn Hauman writing ability: The other interesting thing is that I can't find one thing that has been written by Trevor Von Eeden (the VOR who they say is writing this comic book). (Here is some evidence that shows that I maybe incorrect about his writing ability, but notice that all of these books have been co-authored by him, which I suspect could mean that he did the art work.) The net has plenty of information on Mr.Von Eeden, but its all about his artwork. There are more links about him than the Racist Suspect named Glenn Hauman. So far none of the sites list a single work written by Trevor Von Eeden by himself. There are at least a hundred links so I could be incorrect. Now if you are running a comic book business, would you have the artist who has not written anything, start writing the content for your comic book? If you had someone who works for you who has written books and won awards for the books that they've written, wouldn't you want them to write your comic books? Weigh the scales. Artist with no writing skills or Award winning writer? Would a Racist Liberal(one who chooses to make Racism/White Supremacy more comfortable for its victims) know that their content may be called "Racist" if it were known to be written by a "white" person? Would that same Racist Liberal have a "black" person appear to be the writer? Could the content be called Racist against "black" people if ti was written by a "black" person? I shall return! Stay strong in the fight to eliminate Racism (White Supremacy).