Counter Racism Now! Campaigns

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Ku Klucker Gets Executed For Byrd Lynching

I find it to be ironic that a Victim of Racism, Troy Davis, and an admitted Racist White Supremacist, Lawrence Brewer Jr, have been executed at the same time.  Brewer received the death penalty for his role in the lynching of James Byrd. Another admitted White Supremacist, was executed in 1997, for lynching a Victim of Racism. Such retribution has been too few and far between. I am against the death penalty, however. I suspect that a person will suffer more still breathing, confined to a small cell, 23 hours a day, with one hour to get fresh air in a confined cage set away from the rest of the population, is better.

If it so happens that the person is innocent of murder, their still around to be free of crime that they were convicted of. This should be the case, especially under the system of White Supremacy, because we know this to be a system of injustice and that their exists a disproportionate number of  Victims of Racism in Greater Confinement and whom are on death row. We have seen cases where people were found to be guilty in court, because they were either forced to confess, or because others were forced to say they witnessed the person (s) commit the crime, when they really weren't, were released from Greater Confinement, because people recanted, or DNA evidence proved that the person was not at the seen.

The Scottsboro Boys , the central park five, Geronimo Pratt, Gary Dotson, and plenty of others, demonstrate the necessity for ending the death penalty. You can't bring an innocent person back from death, if new evidence proves their innocence. I read some where that some tribes in so-called Africa, used to make a murderer serve the family of their victims, until that family said their restitution had been paid, which in most cases, would be until death. Maybe something along those lines could be done. I don't know. But, I do know that until a system of justice is established, which means a system where no person is mistreated for any reason, people will continue to kill others.

Stay Strong in the struggle to Replace Injustice With Justice

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

White Supremacy Revealed?

The 9/1/11 episode of "The Ultimate Merger" that aired on TVONE, had a brief revelation of truth the other night. I usually don't watch these "reality" shows which are everything but reality, but, my attempted wife (see UICCSC Word Guide pages 426-427) who watches them daily, was watching this one particular show, when I happened to hear something about the "White" men on the show communicating in a silent code. You know that caught my attention.

The show is about 14 males (11 "non-white" and 3 "white") competing against each other for the affection of a "black" female named Toccara. The female version of "Flava flave"( only she looks way better).

Apparently, the "white" men on the show "developed" a "white" alliance in where they agreed not to compete against each other, until all of the "non-white" males were eliminated. Whenever it came time for one of them to spend "some alone time" with Toccara, they'd show three fingers up (W) and two fingers down (A) to each other as a reminder of their alliance to not "throw each other under the bus". I could be incorrect, but, it would not be Racist to have such an alliance, unless they are allied on throwing all of the "non-white" people under the bus. Racism / White Supremacy is mistreatment on the basis of skin color.

Anyway, one, or some of, the "black" males noticed the hand gestures and asked about them. The "white" men did not say anything. The show goes to break. After the commercial, some how the "black" males find out what it meant. Instead of approaching the matter logically, they get angry with the "white" men and get absolutely no where. No one learns anything. Everyone in the room is shouting and no one is listening.

Unfortunately for us, there appeared to be so much emotion (and not enough logic) and confusion in the room, that everyone involved missed out on the perfect opportunity to discuss out in the open, what huge numbers of people discuss behind closed doors. Racism (White Supremacy) is the elephant in the room that everyone (when I say everyone I mean "white" and "non-white" people) in the room, spend a great deal of time and energy, pretending is not there.

If it were a show that demonstrated an actual reality (like a major reality called Racism) going on, it would not have been a complete waste of time and energy. However, it was one, because they got no where constructive with it. We ("white" and "non-white" people) need to have a courteous open dialog, about White Supremacy, without being so-called politically correct and without emotion.

As it stands right now, on most occasions, when Racism is discussed in the same room, "white" people get angry and "non-white" people get embarrassed.

In my opinion the actual purpose for this episode of "The Ultimate Merger"as a "reality" show was to program its "non-white" viewers to react in the same manner as the "non-white" actors did in this episode, when they were confronted with Racist Action.

Okay, right now, the "race" issue has been indirectly touched upon, everyday, since the selection of Obama for president. This has been more so, than any other time in the history of the so-called USA. His selection has made the evidence of Racism White Supremacy more visible to its victims, and at the same time made many people take more actions toward ignoring that existence.

This includes influencing others to not have a constructive dialog about it. Because as long as no one discusses it logically, it continues to be that huge elephant.

What influences others to not have dialog? Emotions like anger, embarrassment, guilt, disappointment, can lead to conflict. In this case the "non-white" people appeared to get angry, and were discourteous, which in turn made the "white" people appear to feel embarrassed and shut their mouths about how they were practicing Racism White Supremacy.

Dialog is what was needed. An all out no holds barred courteous discussion on White Supremacy and how it affects people.

It's not shown in the below clip, because it was edited out, but in the full episode (which is always edited), one of the "white" males started his sentence "with it all started with a war that has been going on since 1870."

He was immediately interrupted by a "non-white" male , who said something like "Oh, no you're not about to give us a [implied "black"] history lesson!" I am paraphrasing him.

Anyone that wasn't paying close attention could have thought that the "white" person was speaking about slavery or the so-called "civil war" (what is civil, about war?). The minute someone mentions the 1800's, those are the first things that come to mind. Both ended in 1865. I suspect that the "white" male was talking about the period known as Reconstruction, because it is at that time that groups like the Ku Klux Klan came about. These groups used the tools (deception and violence) of White Supremacy to the fullest, and thus terrorized "non-white" people out of resources and political positions that would have evened the playing field. Such groups are often admired by the unsophisticated Racist suspects who what to bring back the "good ol' days".

I suspect that "Reality shows" are scripted, just like movies and other t.v. programs are. The producers do not allow us to see anything that they don't want us to see. The two "white" men are even dressed similar during the confrontation in front of Toccara. They are both wearing the stereotypical clothing (pendalton shirts and holey blue jeans) that would be seen on the kind of "white" people that the smart and powerful White Supremacists want us to think are the only kind of "white" people that can be Racists. You know the kind that drive pick-up trucks and chew tobacco? See below.

Bottom line is that the true Racist Action was not the "white alliance" that the "non-white" males "discovered" in this show. The true Racist Action was the indirect promotion (subliminally) of the idea that White Supremacy does not need to be discussed between "white" and "non-white" people, because if you do, you're going to get no where with it. Another more subtle idea was one related to the Racist Propaganda term known as "reverse racism", which implies that "white" people are being victimized by "Black" people on the basis of skin color. This is a term that has been picked up and used often amongst the less sophisticated Racist suspects. The kind who dress in an appearance similar to how the two "white" men were dressed in the above video. I suspect that they were instructed to dress this way in order to relate The message sent to them was "black people won't let white people have a white alliance, but it's okay that they have a show with mostly black people on it?, they have black unity, black nationalism, they have BET, they have TVONE, Obama is president, it's not fair! so keep your white alliances a secret because revealing the truth about it will get you know where." Stay strong in the struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Sunday, September 18, 2011

On Riots In The "UK"

Found an interesting video on Gus T Renegade's Blog it was made by a Youtuber usernamed "flawedelection".

I hope that it is constructive for you.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

From a Racist Suspect

Here is a comment that a Racist Suspect left on my page. First off, he posted his comment to a post that had nothing to do with it. That was confusing.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else? While I do not condone Don Imus's stupidity to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles I hate to imagine what would have happened had this event happened to a non white in a white neighborhood. In my case I was told by the Police it was my fault for being in THEIR part of town? So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"- Benjamin

The next confusing thing was that "Benjamin" put question marks at the end of his statements. The codified approach is not to respond to statements, and to answer questions. Did he use question marks, so I that I would attempt to answer them? If so, I'm taking the bait.  

"I find it curious that when a WHITE man says nappy headed ho's its racist, but listening to SOME rap it is OK for black singers to degenerate their own and everybody else?"-
I've never said that a "white" man saying "nappy headed hoes" is racist. Whoever said that, said what they said and you need to talk to them about that, not me. I do not think that it is okay for someone call anyone a name that they do not want to be called. If I were asked to comment on it, I would have said that "White" man was name calling. As for "black" singers degenerating their own and everybody else, that is the fault of the Racists (White Supremacists) who encourage those singers to believe that the degenerating style of noise that they call "music" is what sells. I suggest that you speak to the shareholders, board members, and the executive teams of Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and the other music companies that dominate the area of Entertainment. They tell the singers what to say and do in their noise, not me. Neeext!
"to say racism is only from WHITE to everybody else is quite simply to live in denial. While in Norfolk Virginia I made the mistake of walking down Church Street and almost got stoned, and beaten down by thrown bottles."-

If this did in fact happened to you, it was mistreatment, but it wasn't racism. It was a re-action to Racism (White Supremacy), and not actual Racism. I do not condone that type of re-action. I find it hard to believe that you were attacked for being "white" and the Enforcement Officials did nothing about it, let alone told you that you should not have been there. It just doesn't make sense. If you weren't injured and you could not identify anybody, then what you are saying may make some sense, because they need to have something to go by. I have seen Enforcement Officials go after a bunch of "black" people, when they had nothing else to go by other than they were told the person was "black". Most "black" people know automatically that messing with "white" people will get you in trouble. Also, I have seen plenty of "white" people walking around freely in areas of Richmond CA that some "non-white" people will not even allow other "non-white" people to go in, without having any problems from "non-white" people.

There was a rare situation when I saw a group of "black" males throwing bricks at cars driving through North Richmond, that had "white" people in them. It was in RE-ACTION ( I tried to convince them that such behavior was not constructive) to what happened to Yusef Hawkins and another youth whose name slips my mind . 10 to 15 Enforcement Officials came in and arrested every young "black" male, in the vicinity, except me and another person (because we had on suits). In response to that, the city mowed down some houses and a few other buildings. Then built a huge parkway that runs right through this area today.
The parkway has a 10 foot walls on both sides and cars move through at 60 miles an hour. The White Supremacists showed them who had the power. They basically said "Throw another brick at "White" people and see what happens to this area!" Hell,"Black" people been killing other "Black" with automatic weapons for decades in North Richmond, and can't even a get pot hole in the street filled. But, let some cars owned by "White" people get some bricks thrown at them and it's remodeling time? See the Racism lies in the fact that the "White" people who had the power to stop "Black" people from throwing bricks at "white" people, could to stop "Black" people from killing "Black" people, but they choose not to do so. They would rather say that "Black" people are to blame, and that they are responsible for stopping it. Never mind the fact that it is "White" people who profit from the weapons and ammunition that is used to do the killing.  

"So in the end when you address ALL racism by ALL to any I can support you, til then I can only say to you be your way and to me be mine, hopefully one day we can meet to pursue JUSTICE FOR ALL NOT SOME. Thank You"

Racism (White Supremacy) is injustice for everybody. It is a faulty system that promotes deception and violence, which is no constructive for anyone. The only Racism that I am worried about is the one that makes ME a Victim. It is what is uncommonly referred to as FUNCTIONAL RACISM. It's not just me getting the name calling, it's not just me getting the bottles, bricks, and sticks, thrown at me, it's not just me knowing not to be in certain places, because I could be lynched, its not just me getting deceived into and out of things, its not just me walking in fear of racist action, every day, its also my family members going five generations back. All of us have experienced this stuff because we are classified by "white" people as "non-white". Any other kind of what you are calling "Racism" are simple ideologies that are nothing more than the primitive attempts of some "non-white" people who've chosen to REACT to the FUNCTIONAL RACISM that they've experienced.

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

Are "White" people racially Oppressed?: HELL NO!

This is my response to a CNN article (rated #1 on their "most popular stories right now" list on 3/5/11 @9:01am) that asks the question "Are whites racially oppressed?"

I am baffled at the fact that some "White" people are saying that they are "racially oppressed" these days, because I've been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 42.5 years. My father-less (see page 120 of the U.I.C.C.S.C: Word Guide) was a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years, and my mother-less, currently has been a Victim of White Supremacy (racially oppressed) for 68 years. 

I have so much knowledge and experience in being a Victim of White Supremacy, that I earned a PH.D( ) in it. I thought for sure that by now I knew what it meant to be "Racially Oppressed", but, since these “White” people are saying that they are, maybe it’s true and I just don't know what I’m talking about.
So for purposes of getting to the bottom line let’s assume that it is true that “White” people are “Racially Oppressed”.

This means that I will offer these “Racially Oppressed White People” the benefit of the doubt and investigate their claim. Never mind the fact that on most occasions when I’ve stated that I am "Racially Oppressed", I barely get this same kind of consideration. No news broadcasters have called me to get my story.

Upon hearing my claim to be a Victim of Racism, most of the "White" people, that I have spoken to make comments like:

"Get a job nigger; you have too much time on your hands."

“Slavery was a long time ago, so get over it.”

 “You have Affirmative Action.”

“You have a black president now, so stop whining.”


“Are Whites Racially Oppressed?”

Many questions came to my mind when contemplating the answer to this grandest question of all questions

1. What does "Racially" mean? 

"Racially" is an adverb of the adjective "Racial", therefore,
The Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition states:

Racial- 1. of, relating to or based on a race.2. existing or occurring between races.

2. What does "oppressed" mean? 

"Oppressed" is the word "oppress" in its past tense, therefore,
 the Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language College Edition states:

Oppress- 1. To weigh heavily on the mind, spirits, or senses of; 2. to keep down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority; burden with harsh, rigorous impositions; tyrannize over. 3. a) To crush; trample down. b) To overpower; subdue.

Okay following the logic:

If “White” people are Racially Oppressed because they are classified as “White”,

Then they are kept “down by the cruel or unjust use of power or authority” from “non-white” people dominating and subjugating them in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity including Economics, Education, Entertainment, Labor, Law, Politics, Religion, Sex, and War.

Correct? (I know, I know, I’m shaking my head too, but let’s play along.)

Before we look at some of the evidence, 

We'll start with the main reason (I suspect) that these people ( not all "white" people) are saying that they are "oppressed".
Most Powerful Victim of Racism (White Supremacy) in the known universe
Was he selected by "White" people to be President?


Evidence marked exhibit #1 The President's Cabinet
Look at all of those "Racially Oppressed" "White" people.
If Obama is keeping "White" people down by being cruel and making unjust use of his power or authority, why is not his cabinet filled with "non-white" people?

If he had the kind of power that the smart and powerful Racists had, backing him, he could surround himself with "Wesley Snipes" complexioned people and there would not be a damn thing that anyone could do about it. Now, that would be cruelty.

I've admitted that I am confused about knowing how a "White" person looks. There are many times where I am incorrect about it. I've never seen anyone that was the color of a white piece of paper or a white crayon.

Maybe most of the people in the above pic are all classified as "non-white" people? I don't know. What do you think? I think I need a "White" person to tell me. But since I don't have one available, I'll presume that they are "White" people, because many of the people who've told me that they were "White" have the same skin tone as those they want us to presume are classified as "White". I could be incorrect.

Was the move against "Libya" about keeping "non-white" people from having something real to bring to the table?

Sunday, September 04, 2011

How to deal with "White" people. PART 1

The first thing that you want to do is admit the truth to yourself (if you are a "non-white" person), which is, that you are a Victim of Racism in system of Racism / White Supremacy and because of that fact, you are less than one percent as smart as you thought you were.

I know that this position is going to take some getting used to.

Many of you are saying "Oh hell naw, SynQ, if I say that, I'm saying that I am stupid, and I aint stupid."

"I'm too proud of who I am, and who we are, to say that we are victims, SynQ."

"Man, our people built the pyramids. SynQ, we come from kings and queens."

I estimate that for the last 50 or so years, we've been blasted with what has been called "positive thinking". I prefer to use the lesser used term, called the "see and be" technique, because it eliminates confusion.

See the catchy part in this term is the word positive. Because of that word this phrase took off like a wildfire. Especially, amongst "non-white" people. Within this period, a lot of "White" people were openly truthful about the existence of this system, and the ones (they called themselves "White liberals") who appeared to be helping us deal with it, were saying that this system, made us as individuals, have a "low self-esteem".

According to them, having a "low self-esteem", meant that we were too afraid and / or mentally weak to set any goals or pursue any goals if we had any.

I suspect that some of these "White liberals" ran with the idea that we needed to FEEL GOOD about ourselves, because of the accomplishments of others who had the same skin color.

They came up with these "firsts". You know the kind of thing, I'm talking about?

"Hank Aaron was the first black this........Joe Lewis was the first black that."

Their idea in my opinion was to make us more comfortable with the affects of the system. You and I are supposed to FEEL PROUD of ourselves, because of the works of another "black" person. Well, that's a slap in the face, as far as I am concerned.

The same can be said for our history. True, that knowing the history is important. Those who don't know the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them. That is all that you need to know history for.

Okay, I digressed BIG TIME. Well sort of.

The next thing that you want to do is see the "white" person as a Racist Suspect. This is because under the system of Racism (White Supremacy), we've been conditioned through White Supremacist Propaganda to see most "white" people as "innocent" and "trustworthy", merely because they are "White".  No? How many "White" people are there around you, whom you believe will steal from you?  It probably doesn't cross your mind because the propaganda has you thinking that most "white" people have too much money to steal from a "non-white" person. The same can be said for selling or using dope, pimping, killing, lying, etc. Sure there are "white" people doing these things, but is it the first image that comes to your mind when you imagine some one doing them? By no means am I saying that you should see all "white" people as Racists, because not all "white" people are Racists. The only way that you should see one as a Racist is if they admit that they are one, or if another "white" person says that another "white" person is one. Even then you should never call one a Racist (unless they give you permission to), because that would be name calling. It is counter productive to be discourteous to anyone. It is better to just avoid contact. The main point here is that many "white" people who are Racists will not tell you.

The third thing that you want to do is be prepared. That means that you should read up on and / or research whatever subject you intend to deal with them on.
CAUTION: This is not to show them how much you've learned or how much you know on the subject. This is so that your questions can be more precise in order to not give the "white" person any "wiggle room", with their answers. For example- if you are relying on a "white" person to sell you a car, you should learn as much as you can about the process of buying a car, before you go to the dealership. When I used to sell cars it was widely known amongst the employees of the dealership, that "black" people lacked knowledge in negotiation, finance, and about the cars that they were buying (especially if it is a used car). There were "white" car sales people who were known to not deal with anyone except "black" people, because they knew that they'd make a lot of money off of their lack of knowledge. The real deception was that their victims, thought that these sales people were dealing with them, because they cared about "black" people.

The fourth thing that you do, is ask the "white" person to speak slowly and use simple words as though they are speaking to (you like) a third grader. Some of you may find this insulting, however, in most cases we get victimized by White Supremacy, because we are lead to THINK that we are smart when we really aren't. The reason for talking like you are a third grader, is because listening to the ENGLISH language can get very complicated and confusing real quick. If you misunderstand the meaning of just one word in a sentence, you could be thrown off from the point that they were making. Once that happens confusion can set in at a time when you think you understand what is being said, and you wont even know that you are confused.

The fifth thing is to pay close attention to what is being said. In fact, it would be better if you had some kind of recording device. Many people talk extremely fast, even after you've asked them to speak slowly.

The sixth thing is to make no assumptions (during the conversation) about what is being said or done. Ask questions. Ask a whole lot of questions. This actually puts you in control of the situation, because you are learning about the thinking process of the person that you are asking the questions of. If you are paying close attention to what is being said then you can tell whether that person is telling you the truth or using deception. It is not a full proof way, because if a person knows in advance what kind of questions you're going to ask, they may be prepared to give you the answers that will make them sound like they're telling the truth. However, asking questions in most cases puts you in the "drivers seat". It's like your the prosecutor and they're on the stand or your the interviewer and they're the interviewee.

I hope that this is constructive.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Should a "White" person be viewed as a Racist Suspect?

Answer: Yes.

Counter Racist Compensatory Logic says that under the system of White Supremacy, a "non-white" person does not have the ability (Some "non-white" people will disagree with me on whether we possess such an ability or not. That's okay, but, we will not go into that topic here.) to determine who is and who is not a Racist, therefore any person classified as "White", should be viewed as a Racist Suspect.
Kevin Malone

However, it is up to the individual "non-white" person to decide if a "White" person should remain on the Racist suspect list or not. One "White" person could choose not to mistreat me on the basis of skin color, and on the other hand that same "White" person could mistreat you (another "non-white" person) on the basis of yours. And on the next day (hour, min, sec, etc.), I could be their target of mistreatment, instead of you.

I site today's article from as evidence to support the reason why as long as the system of White Supremacy exists, a "White" person should always be viewed as a Racist Suspect.

The 51 year old Racist Suspect (Kevin Malone) accused of mistreating a 14 year old "non-white" person, was viewed as a friend by Ms. Phylis Pearson (a "black" female). Learn more about this incident by clicking here.

A part of the article says-

"Village Trustee Phyllis Pearson, who had served on the Village Board with Malone’s wife, JoAnn, said she was disappointed in her friend.

Pearson said it would be in Malone’s best interest for him to resign.

“He stooped to the child’s level,” said Pearson, who is black.

Pearson said people previously told her Kevin Malone was racist but she hadn’t ever seen him display that type of behavior before."

The Racist Suspect is also a "Democrat", which from my observation has been a often used term that deceives many "Non-white" people into believing that the "White" person who claims this position will not practice White Supremacy.

At the age of 12 I had more friends that were classified as "White", than I had friends that were classified as "Non-white". Many of the "White" ones let me know at some point, that they didn't like niggers, but that I was okay, because I was "different". Oftentimes when I heard them use the word, it was at times that they were so engrossed in conversation with another "non-black" person, that they forgot I was present.

"Hey...Hey, why do they have to be called niggers?"

Two of them, who did not know each other and on separate occasions, gave me the same definition of what a nigger was, when I asked them what made me different?

"A nigger is a black asshole. You're not an asshole"

At that time, I was all too happy to hear that they didn't see me as a nigger. My emotions ( a mixture of anger, embarrassment, sadness and happiness) prevented me from asking more questions. It was as though I had fell victim to some kind of "Jedi Mind trick" (Wow, "White" people like me, but hate other "black" people? Yeh!).  Hey, these guys were telling me that I was better than other "black" people and that it was okay. You know that when you have the "White man's stamp of approval" it's all good. Those same two guys and a few other "White" people that I associated with back in those days, didn't hesitate to call me a nigger whenever I did something that upset them. It would be at those times that I'd get physical. My folks told me that if I get physical or even angry behind their use of the word, then I lose the battle. Oops, I digressed BIG TIME.

The point is that under the system of Racism (White Supremacy), a "Non-white" person can not determine who is a Racist and who is not a Racist, though that "Non-white" person can choose to remove a "White" person from the Racist Suspect list, it is not recommended.

It is up to the "White" person to make this determination, by making a conscious effort not to mistreat someone on the basis of skin color, in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity.

Stay Strong in the struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Got to Get Back to My Training

My long time friend and one of my Martial Arts Instructors Master Nzazi Malonga saw a picture of me the other day. "You are not allowed to have a belly." and before that at my dad's funeral he said "Never forget your training."

Then the other day I was showing my 6 year-old male offspring some martial arts moves.

I said "how do I look?"

"Not good."

I was like wow. I can remember a time when training was an everyday thing for me. Back in the day when I was roaming the streets with nothing constructive to do, I was a pretty good fighter.

I received training from some of the best Martial Artists in the Bay Area.

Master Nzazi Malonga, Master Julius Baker, Master Byong Yu, Master Luther Secrease, Sifu Bill Owens, Mfundishi Tayari Casel, Master Nsoah Chinasu, and my dad, who trained me to have the spirit of a warrior.

It's been sometime since I've had that "kill concrete" kind of spirit. 

I long for it now.........

I kept it simple....

Every morning, I'd start with a warm up. I'd do a chi gung exercise that would help me to generate energy.

Then a series of stretches to help me loosen up all of my muscles and joints, then

25 push-ups
25 sit-ups
25 chin ups
25 lunges

running in place for 1 minute

lift two 10 pound dumb bells 25 times

or I'd switch it up with crunches, duck-walks, squats, knee-bends, jumping jacks, and many other exercises.
Then, Practice, Practice, Practice, my moves.

I'm going to get it back. The above song is the perfect motivator for this.

Then, I'm going to say to my male offspring "How do I look?" (yeah, yeah, I know it's Show-Offism)

He's going to say "Wow!"

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Pretending Not To See Skin Color

I found a link to an interesting Huffington Post article on Racism today. While reading it, I realized that if I replaced the word race, with the two words skin and color, it was more constructive in eliminating the confusion, that it caused me by using the word race. Counter Racist Compensatory Logic suggests that use of the word race, promotes RACE-ism, and therefore it should not be used.

"Race" is a fabricated term, that can only be communicated through an idea. It is a social construction that is only real, because millions of smart and powerful "White" people believe that it is real. It can go away as soon as those people stop believing in it.

Skin Color, on the other hand, is an actual reality created by the Creator, and therefore is true, because it is not based on an idea.

For example the title of the article is "Pretending Not To See Race", I changed it to "Pretending Not To See Skin Color". Do this every time you see the word race (while reading the article), and it will help you see more clearly what is actually being said.

Read the Huffington Post article here

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

To Change "Public Policy".

I was listening to Dick Gregory on the C.O.W.S. radio show:

Listen to internet radio with The COWS on Blog Talk Radio
He mentioned that the reason,Victim of Racism, Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated was because he could influence public policy. That made me think about, Victim of Racism, Malcolm X announcing his plans to go to the so-called Human Rights (see page 162 of the U.I.C.C.S.C.-word guide for "Human Rights") Commission of the United Nations in an attempt to influence the public policy of the whole planet. Who is the public? The public is the people that matter. Who are the people that matter in a system of Racism (White Supremacy)? Let's spell it, altogether now W-H-I-T-E-P-E-O-P-L-E. But, don't blame them, it isn't their fault. It is the fault of the Racists who hang out amongst them. It has been said (and I agree) that the real reason that Malcolm X was assassinated was to keep him from making his speech to the United Nations. Somehow he found out about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This document is what the Racists (White Supremacists), use against their "puppets"(whenever the "puppets" realize they are "puppets" and / or no longer want to be), to promote Shadow Fighting (see page 361 of the Word Guide or page of the Textbook / Workbook). Research Victims of Racism, like Idi Amin, Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Laurent Gbagbo, etc. I suspect that Malcolm was going to use this document against the Racist Government (see page 263 of the Textbook/ Workbook and page 140 of the Word Guide). See what the new "puppets" get for Shadowfighting in "Cote d'Ivore"? Oops, I digressed. Back to this "Public Policy" thing. Wiki on "Public Policy"- "Public policy as government action is generally the principled guide to action taken by the administrative or executive branches of the state with regard to a class of issues in a manner consistent with law and institutional customs. In general, the foundation is the pertinent national and subnational constitutional law and implementing legislation such as the US Federal code. Further substrates include both judicial interpretations and regulations which are generally authorized by legislation. [1] Other scholars define it as a system of "courses of action, regulatory measures, laws, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by a governmental entity or its representatives."[2] Public policy is commonly embodied 'in constitutions, legislative acts, and judicial decisions.'[3]" It continues further on to say: "In the United States, this concept refers not only to the end result of policies, but more broadly to the decision-making and analysis of governmental decisions. As an academic discipline, public policy is studied by professors and students at public policy schools of major universities throughout the country. The U.S. professional association of public policy practitioners, researchers, scholars, and students is the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management." Wikipedia also says that "Shaping public policy is a complex and multifaceted process that involves the interplay of numerous individuals and interest groups competing and collaborating to influence policymakers to act in a particular way. These individuals and groups use a variety of tactics and tools to advance their aims, including advocating their positions publicly, attempting to educate supporters and opponents, and mobilizing allies on a particular issue.[4] In this context, advocacy can be defined as attempting to influence public policy through education, lobbying, or political pressure. Advocacy groups 'often attempt to educate the general public as well as public policy makers about the nature of problems, what legislation is needed to address problems, and the funding required to provide services or conduct research. Although advocacy is viewed as unseemly by some in the professional and research community, it is clear that public policy priorities are influenced by advocacy. Sound research data can be used to educate the public as well as policy makers, thereby improving the public policy process.'[4]" The current public policy is that injustice prevails. What shapes or has influence on public policy? Public Opinion Wiki says "Public opinion is the aggregate of individual attitudes or beliefs held by the adult population (view what the code says about the word "adult" on page two of the Word Guide and page 236 of the Textbook/Workbook). Public opinion can also be defined as the complex collection of opinions of many different people and the sum of all their views." Here's what I say about "Public Opinion"- The only "public" opinion that is valued in a system of Racism (White Supremacy), is the opinions of "white" people. They (collectively) are not concerned about what Victims of Racism, think, do or say, unless it affects them in a major way. The majority of 300 million "White" people, formed an opinion that shaped public policy into making the smart and powerful Racists select Barack Obama to be the next President, because they were tired of "White" people like Bush. Listen carefully (it's part of the same clip that Gus played at the end of the Dick Gregory program above) to what the "White" woman is saying to Mr. Fuller, in the below video. She was basically speaking for the way that huge numbers of "White" people were feeling after they realized they had been deceived by Bush and his crew. The clip is dated June of 2003. According to her "White" people thought "Black" people would be humble. They saw "Black" people as less arrogant. "White" people felt abused from the trauma of the world trade center and terrified by the taking of their "civil rights". Many of them felt "disenfranchised". They felt hey this is how "Black" people have felt all of their lives, now we can relate. The Racists saw what the public opinion was and shaped public policy so that a "non-white" person could be President. If they hadn't of listened, they would have had a rebellion, because huge numbers of "white" people felt mistreated by the actions of Bush. Putting a "Black" person in was supposed to help "White" people deal with the trauma of being mistreated. Huge numbers of them have now forgotten all about Bush, and are now blaming Obama for the results of Bush's actions. At present the public's opinion is easily influenced into blaming the "non-white" person. We all know about the various Racist Suspects whom have blamed crimes committed by either themselves or other "White" people on "Black" people for centuries. I suspect that the smart and powerful Racists knew this. Now, listen to the next part..... If you saw the Obama inauguration, they made sure that "White" people saw huge numbers of "White" women with "Black" males in the crowd. What is the "White" woman in this clip saying about "Black" males? Even though she is married to a "White" man? Okay, I digressed slightly. But, keep thinking about everything around us. In a system of Racism (White Supremacy), most everything around us was created for "White" people to use. Often times they had a thing for a long time before it came our way. Of course, I'm speaking of "White" people collectively. Anything, that you can think of that was created for them to conduct their day to day business, can become a disruption, if you apply your mind to it. "White" people paid attention to the so-called "Civil Rights" movement, only because huge numbers of "non-white" people started affecting the business of White Supremacy. It wasn't the singing and marching, unless that singing and marching was done somewhere it wasn't supposed to be done. Imagine standing in the middle of a store singing and marching about being a Victim of Racism? That's bad for business. Imagine speaking and acting to Counter Racism (White Supremacy) in all places, at all times, and in all areas of people activity? Out of 300 Million "White" people, how many of them are Racists? It should not matter to a "non-white" person, because as long as the system of Racism (White Supremacy) exists, they are all suspects. "White" people should decide amongst themselves who are and who are not the Racists, and then work on getting rid of them, or at the least, work on eliminating their power. See collectively they have the ability to eliminate Racism (White Supremacy) overnight, but, they don't have the will to do it, because it is not affecting their business. Racism is a business. This is why we need Effective Numbers of Victims of Racism to influence public opinion which in turn changes public policy. We need Effective Numbers of individual Victims of Racism, to "use a variety of tactics and tools to advance their aims, including advocating their positions publicly, attempting to educate supporters and opponents, and mobilizing allies on" promoting the idea that Racism (injustice) should be replaced with justice. The idea that justice should be the business of today. What is justice? according to compensatory logic, justice means to guarantee that no person is mistreated and guaranteeing that the person who needs the most help gets the most constructive help they need. How can a "White" person disagree with that? I see how a Racist would disagree, but, not a "White" person. Some "White" people have said that what I really mean by justice is "Black Supremacy". I don't mean that. How does "Black Supremacy" guarantee that no person is mistreated? How does "Black Supremacy" guarantee that the person who needs the most help get the most constructive help that they need? It's all about getting "White" people to have the will to Replace Racism (White Supremacy) With Justice. Individual Victims of Racism, have gotten their attention in the past. The evidence shows that those same individuals have also gotten the attention of the Racists as well. The Racists will say "Hey this person or that person is bad for business. They have to go." They'll try to use deception first, if that doesn't work, violence comes next. But there's more of an advantage in numbers. One million Victims of Racism going to Washington D.C. made a statement, didn't they? But, imagine if it were eight million of us making the same statements where ever we are. Each one saying "Replace White Supremacy With Justice!" in our own way. Eight million Victims of Racism, functioning in a United-Independent Compensatory codified manner-
  • using a variety of tactics and tools to advance their aims of Replacing White Supremacy With Justice,
  • advocating their positions to Replace White Supremacy With Justice publicly, 
  • attempting to educate supporters and opponents on the idea that Justice is better than Racism, and 
  • mobilizing allies to think, speak, and /or act in a manner that guarantees that no person is mistreated and guarantees that the person who needs the most help gets the most constructive help they need.
Can that go unnoticed? Stay Strong In The Struggle To Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Frederick Jermaine Carter's Death Ruled A Hanging And Not A Suicide

What else is news? We knew all along that it was not a suicide.

Click here for What Happened to Fredrick Jermaine Carter?

Click here for brief info on How To Deal With Lynchings

Listen to internet radio with The COWS on Blog Talk Radio

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

This website is back up and running. Very interesting website. Lots of constructive information. Please go there and practice the experiments, they are very revealing!

I've only tried a few, but the results were constructive in helping me to understand  a little bit more on how Racism (White Supremacy) works and what it is.

Warning: If you do not have the United Independent Compensatory Code Books written by Neely Fuller Jr. (the textbook / workbook and the word guide) many of the words and terms that are used, will confuse you.

Stay Strong in Your Struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Monday, February 28, 2011

I was on the C.O.W.S. Radio Show Again !

Listen to internet radio with Gus T Renegade on Blog Talk Radio
I could be incorrect, but I do not think that many of the people who participate in the discussions on the C.O.W.S. are "codified", meaning that I do not think that many of them have actually read or attempt to practice the UNITED INDEPENDENT COMPENSATORY CODE- Textbook / Workbook. They could have read it and whether they have or not does not matter to the extent of having Victims Guaranteed Qualifications. However, we have got to start moving in a direction that gets us further, than where we have gotten. This means that you should not voice whatever it is that you think the U.I.C.C./S./C. is until you have read it entirely. It would be correct to quote it, as long as you do not make it appear that it came from you, instead of Fuller. If there are parts of the code that you do not agree with and you offer something else instead, state clearly those parts, and make it clear that, whatever it is that you are offering is coming from you and not the code book, so that others will not be confused about it. Confusion cooperates with Racism (White Supremacy). The idea that all "White" people are Racists (White Supremacists) does not come from the U.I.C.C./S./C. The U.I.C.C./S./C. states on page 20 that there are three basic types of people in the known universe:
  1. "White" people
  2. "Non-white" people
  3. White Supremacists (Racists)
Simply say: "I do not agree with the code when it says that there are three basic types of people in the known universe, I only think that there are two basic types."- and then state your reasons why. But, this must be advertised constantly enough, so that people do not believe that it is from the code. I spoke with Mr. Fuller in detail this morning about this. He stated that he sometimes gets calls from people questioning him about ideas that have (either directly or indirectly) been made to appear like they came from the code book, when such ideas have not. In the last paragraph on page one of the U.I.C.C./S./C. it says: "This is not a book to be used to promote dislike or hatred for white people. This is not a book to be used to encourage animosity toward white people or to promote a dislike for white people because of their "whiteness", and / or because they appear to be "White" to the eye/mind of the onlooker." In my opinion, viewing all "White" people as Racists can encourage animosity toward "White" people. Somehow, I suspect that some people are under the impression that because I once viewed Shirley Temple and other "White" females as my objects of affection, that I am in "love" with "White" people. That was a long time ago. I do not "love" them, nor do I "hate" them. Because I suspect that I was extremely misunderstood when I was talking about Katie, I must reiterate that I suspected she was being guided by other "White" people both indirectly and directly to learn how to practice Racism (White Supremacy). I do not believe that at the age of 10, she was practicing Racism (White Supremacy) on her own and at will. Because I have observed that "White" people usually have Racism (White Supremacy) figured out by the time they are 15 years old. I could be incorrect. The point is that she knows that she is a "white" person. If one believes that all "white" people are Racists then one, will believe that she is a Racist, right now, and thus will be blinded to the point that I am attempting to make here. The idea is to force "white" people in the direction of Justice. A "white" person who practices Racism, has to be given a way to change the way that that they do business (and start producing Justice). If one sees all "white" people as Racists, and not Racist Suspects, then it becomes difficult to see what should be done to get Justice, in my opinion. I definitely do not believe that practicing Racism is "in their DNA!" Racism (White Supremacy) is a learned behavior, it is not genetic. When Victims of Racism keep believing in the concept of "Race", they indirectly promote Race-ism (White Supremacy), because Racism thrives off of the idea that all of the people on the planet think, speak, and act differently, because of their genetic make-up . We were taught by the White Supremacists (Racists) to think this way. This is part of our mistreatment, because it keeps us thinking inside the box called Racism (White Supremacy). I agree with the U.I.C.C./S./C. in what it says under the words "Some Questions and Answers Relative to 'Racial' Compensation" on page 12.- It's too long to type, so You'll have to read it for yourself. The only "gene" that makes "White" people and "Non-white" people differ is literally skin deep! It is that "gene" that makes my skin brown and theirs pale, some "White" people have named such a "gene","Melanin". Last night on Gus' show I heard a lot of emotional words and one term directed at "White" people as to the reason they commit Racism (White Supremacy). I even heard people translate what I said about "White" people into emotional words and terms, that I did not use. I heard: "We should not worry about how "White" people feel."
"That refined Racist's blood was boiling..........."
"'White' people [practice Racism], because they fear us." After a few minutes all I heard was: "They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us. They fear us." The point that I attempted to make about fear, is that for me, when I discover that I fear something, I work to eliminate that fear anyway that I can, because I know that fear is an obstacle in my path to completing my objective, and if I have something at my disposal to remove that fear I will use it without hesitation. Following the logic on this would lead me to believe that if the smart and powerful Racists feared "Black" people today, they would wipe us out with no hesitation. They've already experimented doing such things:
  1. in 1921 the Racists dropped a bomb on so-called "Tulsa, Oklahoma", killing 3,000 "non-white" people, who fought to defend themselves against the destruction of people and property.
  2. in 1945 the Racists dropped a nuclear bomb, killing 90,000–166,000 "non-white" people in so-called "Hiroshima" and  dropped another bomb, killing 60,000–80,000 "non-white" people in so-called "Nagasaki".
  3. in 1979 they convinced  close to 1,000 "non-white" people to kill themselves by drinking cyanide laced kool-aid, in so-called "Jonestown, Guyana".
If they "feared" us before these events (there's plenty more evidence), they sure as hell have some courage now. The way that the Cress-theory of color confrontation was implied last night, was not logical, but emotional. The theory itself may or may not have been true. I say that its major purpose is to boost the ego of the Victims who believe it. Dr.Welsing states in THE ISIS PAPERS on page 13 that having an understanding of her theory "will have profound effects on the developing egos and self-images of all non-white children, who suffer severe damage under white supremacy culture." (Best believe that my male offspring's ego and self-image will be boosted!, but then we'll have to move on to the logic.) She further states that it "allows non-whites to to gain psychological liberation from white ideological domination that negatively affects the total functioning of non-whites." She continues on to say that "white peoples of the world presumably also could benefit from such awareness of the motivation behind behaviors that often baffle them. If they are sincere in their attempts to stop the practices of white supremacy (racism), whites may be able to find methods to do so once the cause is understood." Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat!!!   Did she say in the second paragraph from the bottom of page 13-"white peoples of the world presumably also could benefit from such awareness of the motivation behind behaviors that often baffle them." ? - Does this mean that Dr. Welsing suspects that some "white" people are not aware as to what motivates them to practice Racism? If that is the case, can some "white" people practice Racism and not be aware that they are doing so? "Non-white" people bragging that "White" people fear us, is no different than the analogy that Fuller uses in the below video: Since when has the person that makes all of the guns and ammunition been afraid of the person that doesn't have the guns and ammunition? What is the purpose in being the maker of guns and ammunition? I kept saying last night: Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! Racism is a business! I agree that at one time (centuries ago), the smart and powerful Racists, amongst the "White" people collectively feared "Non-white" people. As stated in the below video. The Causes of Racism Though, I agree that the Cress Theory of "White" Genetic Survival or something similar was  the motivation behind the "Causes of Racism", such thinking has since left (Dr. Welsing, sites that the global system of white supremacy has been around for the last 2,000 years.) the minds of the Sophisticated Racists aka Smart and Powerful Racists, when they did the following: The Establishment of Racism White Supremacy Many of the Unsophisticated Racists openly profess their fears with what they call the fourteen words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children" But, what they (and huge numbers of "non-white" people) don't realize is that their existence as a "Race" has already been secured. "White" people collectively today are breathing air for much longer periods of time, than "Black" people. The book "Dying While Black" is filled with evidence to support this claim. All of this while the majority of us participate in non-constructive Entertainment. I contend that at the current time "White" people have nothing to worry about, and the smart and powerful ones know this with out a doubt. The smart and powerful Racists have set so many things in motion, that "Non-white" people are dying in huge numbers from illnesses and poverty. And in the so-called "United States" there are 300+ million "white" people compared to 40 million "Black" people. They aren't letting us "genetically annihilate" anyone, and they know it. These days Racism (White Supremacy) exists for no other purpose than to mistreat people on the basis of color. - I added more words below on 3/4/11---------------------------------------------------------------------- My point is that the smart and powerful Racists who are amongst the "White" collective are the ones who do not fear us. Sure, there are many unsophisticated Racists and Racist Suspects who fear us. But, not all "White" people fear us. This idea that they are is too general to be logical. Any Racist who practices Racism because of fearing "non-white" people is merely practicing one of the many methods of  practicing Racism (White Supremacy). If one views that all "white" people are Racists, then one cannot see the many other methods of Racism that exist. If one cannot see the many other methods of Racism (White Supremacy) that exist, then one cannot be precise in countering it, because they cannot see the details. Logic came with the universe, but, that does not mean that it is something that one makes up right on the spot.
My position on Katie stands with the opinion that Katie is not confused about being a "White" person, because she is in a system of Racism (White Supremacy). Logically speaking such a system cannot produce "White" people who are confused about being "White". At the same time because I do not agree that all "White" people are Racists, I can clearly see that some Racists are helping Katie learn how to practice Racism (White Supremacy).  For Example-The “White” woman  that approached Katie in the park, helped Katie to identify as a “White” person by deliberately going past Mr. Riding ( a "non-white" person and her so-called "parent") asking her direct questions without getting permission from Mr. Riding to speak to Katie, his adoptive child.  This "White" woman at that moment was mistreating Mr. Riding on the basis of color. I am pretty sure that Katie observed what happened. One day (when she is grown up) her turn could come where she could see another "White" child in the same situation that she was in, and at that moment decide to act the same way that the "White" woman acted (and be a Racist), or she could approach the "non-white" male, with courtesy, and ask him about the child, instead.
------------------------end of new words added on 3/4/11-------------------------------------------------- I could be incorrect, but, it appeared to me that many of the C.O.W.S. participants in last night's discussion, believe that "Non-white" people are made up into "Races" of people. "Non-white" people do not have the power to function as a "Race" in a system of RACE-ism (White Supremacy). A "Race" is like a club made up of people that have exclusive privileges that no one outside that "Race" is entitled to. There are two basic re-actions to Racism (White Supremacy):
  1. Cooperation with
  2. Resistance to
How does being apart of a "Race", resist against a system of RACE-ism? How does not being apart of a "Race", co-operate with a system of RACE-ism? All attempted "codified" (meaning the you have read the U.I.C.C./S./C.) persons should be finding out what thoughts, speech, and /or actions cooperate with Racism, eliminate them, and then start developing the kind that resist it. I always think that being on the C.O.W.S. show is constructive, because it offers the opportunity for "non-white" people to come together to exchange views on Racism (White Supremacy). However, I absolutely look forward to the day where by such an exchange is so codified and refined, that whether some of us believe that all "White" people are Racists, and some of us don't, that some of us believe that "White" people fear us, or that some of us don't, we move from the circular thought process (which works like a dog chasing his tale), to the linear thought process that Dr. Welsing mentions in Chapter 12 of  THE ISIS PAPERS, entitled "Black Fear and the Failure of Black Analytical (Ideological) Commitment" Stay Strong In The Struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Fuller's Word Guide is out!

The much anticipated Word Guide that Mr. Fuller has been working on for years, is finally completed and available. It goes by the same title as Fuller's first book, except it's subtitle is different. In other words both book titles begin with "The United Independent Compensatory Code / System / Concept", but differ in the fact that first book is subtitled "A textbook/workbook for thought, speech, and /or action, for Victims of Racism (White Supremacy)" and this new book is subtitled "A Counter Racist Compensatory Word Guide". To distinguish them (reduce the amount of typing), I will refer to the first book as the Textbook/Workbook and the second book as the Word Guide from this point on. At this time, The Word Guide can only be obtained exclusively from Mr.Fuller or his assistant. You can order a copy by printing out and mailing this order form. I was told by his assistant that Mr. Fuller will soon have a website up where you can obtain this new work, in addition to the Textbook/ Workbook. I've already ordered my copy. If it is of any interest to you, some of them are autographed (his assistant's idea) by Mr. Fuller. I'll just be glad to put the contents of the book to some constructive use! If there is one thing that you should learn about the code (I have heard Fuller say this himself) is that it isn't about Fuller. I could be incorrect, but, autographing an item is akin to the first Show-Offism listed in the "four basic Show-Off-isms" on page 41, of the U.I.C.C.S.C:Textbook /Workbook. Anyway, the Word Guide is a supplement to the Textbook/Workbook, and therefore useless without it, so I highly recommend that you purchase and read, the Textbook/Workbook first. Here is the synopsis for the Word Guide: "The 'word-tools' presented in this Work are specifically intended to assist the user in thinking, speaking, and/or acting in a manner that best helps the process of replacing The System of White Supremacy (Racism) with The System of Justice (balance between people). There is reason to believe that the 'best language' for any people to teach, learn, and use, is language that does the most to (1) guarantee that no person is mistreated; and (2) guarantee that the person who needs help the most, gets the most [constructive] help." Stay Strong in your struggle to Replace White Supremacy With Justice (R.W.S.W.J.)

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Dealing with Lynchings

"Of the many inhuman outrages of this present year, the only case where the proposed lynching did not occur, was where the men armed themselves in Jacksonville, Fla., and Paducah, Ky, and prevented it. The only times an Afro-American who was assaulted got away has been when he had a gun and used it in self-defense. The lesson this teaches and which every Afro-American should ponder well, is that a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give. When the white man who is always the aggressor knows he runs as great a risk of biting the dust every time his Afro-American victim does, he will have greater respect for Afro-American life. The more the Afro-American yields and cringes and begs, the more he has to do so, the more he is insulted, outraged and lynched."- Ida B. Wells 1892

This blog is in response to the most recent lynching of a "black" male. His name was Frederick Jermaine Carter. His death (like all of the other hangings of "black" males within the past 30 years was ruled a suicide).
Hanging victim Frederick Jermaine Carter

The last way that a "black" person would choose to commit suicide would be by hanging, in my opinion. We should no longer be surprised about these kinds of situations, especially in places like Mississippi.

Every "Black" person old enough to learn how to use a firearm, should own a firearm. I suspect that one of the reasons that many "black" males are lured into committing felonious acts is so that they cannot acquire a firearm. So stay away from anything that can get you a felony.

Find out what the firearms laws are in your state and proceed to follow them in the process of acquiring your firearms. That means acquiring a permit if need be. Attempt to get a concealed carry permit in your state. Become a card carrying member of the National Rifle Association. Then start or join a local gun club.

DO NOT BREAK ANY LAWS in your process, because you the "non-white" person can easily get caught up, and placed in Greater Confinement. By all means necessary stay out of areas where you are not wanted, unless you absolutely have to go there to do something constructive. It does appear that Mr. Carter was there to work and he wasn't alone, which is the other suggestion(to not be alone in such areas). But, he walked off. Never walk off! Stick close to your partner and maintain constant contact if you have to be alone (like a restroom break for instance), for a small time.